Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
18% in the US, according to these guys; http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0904509.html . Why?Are there available studies saying it's mainly teenagers having abortions?
that is so messed up on so many levels
What part of "opt out" did you not get?In order to make sure that women have control over their own bodies we must forcibly install implants in every girl.
What part of "opt out" did you not get?
Think of it like a vaccination program. Anyone can opt out at any time, including not getting one to start with. The idea is that if you actively go out of your way to give everyone a "fire and forget" contraceptive, rather than merely "making it available", more people would get it. It's not a problem for religious people, because contraception is only a problem if you're having sex, right? Well, presumably religious people wouldn't be having sex in situations likely to result in an unwanted pregnancy, so having an Implanon type implant isn't going to materially effect them. For everyone else, there are no cases of "oops, better have an abortion".I read the "until opt out" as meaning that it would be required to use the implant at age 16, but that they could opt out later.
But if you mean merely that the implant would be available upon request, how is this substantially different from any other program to distribute contraceptives?
Think of it like a vaccination program. Anyone can opt out at any time, including not getting one to start with. The idea is that if you actively go out of your way to give everyone a "fire and forget" contraceptive, rather than merely "making it available", more people would get it. It's not a problem for religious people, because contraception is only a problem if you're having sex, right? Well, presumably religious people wouldn't be having sex in situations likely to result in an unwanted pregnancy, so having an Implanon type implant isn't going to materially effect them. For everyone else, there are no cases of "oops, better have an abortion".
quote from Congressman Randy Forbes, 4th District, VA, from his newsletter today:
https://mail.aol.com/webmail-std/en-us/suite
"...This is not about politics..."
I didn't know Implanon was no longer on the market. But fine, whatever the current iteration is. If people have a medical reason not to get one, don't get one. No worries. That's hardly likely to be most people, though, is it?You really can't imagine why someone would object to using Implanon other than being a Christian who objects to both premarital sex and to contraceptives? You are aware that there are side effects to the use? You are aware that there are people who are allergic to it? You are aware that the long-term side effects of use are largely unknown? You are aware that Implanon in particular isn't even on the market anymore (though it has been replaced by similar drugs)? You are aware that some people mistrust designer drugs on principle (and so will also refuse vaccinations)?
And that's not even getting into funding issues.
You think you're going to be able to make abortion illegal without providing funding somewhere? Whatever the cost of an Implanon implant in every woman who wants one costs, I doubt it is more than the cost of caring for pregnancies and children if abortion ceases to be available.And that's not even getting into funding issues.
I didn't know Implanon was no longer on the market. But fine, whatever the current iteration is. If people have a medical reason not to get one, don't get one. No worries. That's hardly likely to be most people, though, is it?
I'[ve thought about the issue plenty. I never said "that contingent would be too small to matter". But let's worry about the majority of people, rather than throwing our hands up and saying "not 100% effective, therefore let's not do it".It your solution to the reasons that people might not want to have the implant is to put on rosy glasses and pretend like that contingent would be too small to matter, we might as well pretend like the number of teenagers who will engage in sexual intercourse generally will be too small to matter.
If you are going to chastise pro-lifers for not having all the answers, you should think about the issue for more than 30 seconds yourself.
That's dangerous considering girls at age 16 arent emotionally responsible enough to make such decisions.Think of it like a vaccination program. Anyone can opt out at any time, including not getting one to start with. The idea is that if you actively go out of your way to give everyone a "fire and forget" contraceptive, rather than merely "making it available", more people would get it. It's not a problem for religious people, because contraception is only a problem if you're having sex, right? Well, presumably religious people wouldn't be having sex in situations likely to result in an unwanted pregnancy, so having an Implanon type implant isn't going to materially effect them. For everyone else, there are no cases of "oops, better have an abortion".
Wow.Fetuses are not people, according to the Catholic church. http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/...catholic-hospital-says-in-court-case/1863013/