• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Decision Making

eleos1954

God is Love
Site Supporter
Nov 14, 2017
11,014
6,437
Utah
✟851,751.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Hello, I am curious how married couples deal with decision making in their marriage.

I know what the bible says about the husband being the leader and ultimately, at an impasse, the decision maker...but I'm curious what decisions does he decide? All of them, at every impasse, no matter how big or small the issue?

Or is it just the big ones, that affect the finances or the family as a whole?

The reason I ask is this, and let me know in your family, what you would do, please.

My niece is getting married @ New Years in another state. My whole family is going (my parents, my brother, etc). My 3 kids and I would love to go. But my husband is unable to get the time off work. My kids will be on school break and I have the time I can take off. My parents offered to pay for all expenses, except food, which we'd be paying for no matter where we were.

My husband does not want us to go. Of course, he hasn't given me his answer yet....and it's a touchy subject...but he somehow has a problem with us going. At first it was financial, until he found out my parents were covering costs. Then it became about church, because he's Catholic and didn't want the kids missing any Days of Obligation. But I explained we are traveling after and will be home before, any of those Days. And my nieces wedding is on Sunday in a Catholic church and I already called my husbands Priest and explained the situation and he told me since the wedding is in a Catholic church and will have a mass, the Sunday mass obligation is covered.

I see no logical reason why my husband would not be ok with us going on this trip. He knows it's a time for the kids and I to get out of the house and get to travel, something we normally couldn't afford to do. And since my husband doesn't travel well, and doesn't really groove well with my family, it would be a nice getaway and time apart.

If tables were turned, while I would not like being left behind, if I knew my husband and kids really wanted to go and his family was paying for all expenses, I wouldn't stop them from going and having a good time and I'd actually appreciate the "me time".

I feel like because he doesn't want me to go and because he isn't able to go (jealous?) that he wants to keep us from going, because of his own personal reasons. My kids keep telling me that he tells them, he's probalbly going to say no to the trip, which infuriates me, because it's like he holds it over our heads and the kids don't need to be involved in our discussion. Anytime there is any tension over any issue, and he throws in my face, "Oh great, I can't wait until we talk about the wedding trip"....I don't know what he's waiting for or mulling over, but in my honest opinion, it should be as simple as, Can we afford the costs for food? Do we have the time to take off? Is our schedule open to do this? Are you really wanting to go? Do I trust you? If the answer is yes to these, then I do not see why it is something to mull over for 6 days, let alone 6 months.

And quite honestly, I'm becoming resentful and a great animosity is growing against my husband because I feel like his "decision making" is more of a lordship over me, because of how he handles any decisions he makes. He makes it a big ordeal, thumping me (not literally) over the head with the Bible and how it says husband take the lead, and wives must submit, yadda yadda... And to add in, he's a very selfish person, and has been our entire 20 years together...so I don't believe his decisions are Godly, or selfless, at all, I truly think he makes these decisions for what HE wants, what HE needs and what HE desires, more than anything. And how do I prove that? How do I get around that, while still doing my duty as a submissive wife? Ugh...I'm frustrated. Any advice or thoughts would be appreciated.

Some people in marriage have the mind set that they have to do everything together. Used to be that way in our marriage. So, I just started stating, this or that is going on and I'd like to go .... do you want to go with me? Also, I encourage him to go do things he likes to do (by himself or with a friend/friends) that I don't like to do (like going to sports events) ... even so occasionally I will go to some here and there.

Over time, although he still has that "everything together" mindset to a certain degree, he is a lot lot better about it.

In marriage, yes you are a couple ... a couple of individuals that don't necessarily want to do the same things all the time ... and that's ok.

It can get chronic and then it is perceived from one or the other as being controlling, and that certainly is not a good thing.

In marriage, it's about keeping a balance.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lucky9
Upvote 0

CassieShannon

Active Member
May 3, 2018
25
10
37
southeast
✟24,926.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hello, I am curious how married couples deal with decision making in their marriage.

I know what the bible says about the husband being the leader and ultimately, at an impasse, the decision maker...but I'm curious what decisions does he decide? All of them, at every impasse, no matter how big or small the issue?

Or is it just the big ones, that affect the finances or the family as a whole?

The reason I ask is this, and let me know in your family, what you would do, please.

My niece is getting married @ New Years in another state. My whole family is going (my parents, my brother, etc). My 3 kids and I would love to go. But my husband is unable to get the time off work. My kids will be on school break and I have the time I can take off. My parents offered to pay for all expenses, except food, which we'd be paying for no matter where we were.

My husband does not want us to go. Of course, he hasn't given me his answer yet....and it's a touchy subject...but he somehow has a problem with us going. At first it was financial, until he found out my parents were covering costs. Then it became about church, because he's Catholic and didn't want the kids missing any Days of Obligation. But I explained we are traveling after and will be home before, any of those Days. And my nieces wedding is on Sunday in a Catholic church and I already called my husbands Priest and explained the situation and he told me since the wedding is in a Catholic church and will have a mass, the Sunday mass obligation is covered.

I see no logical reason why my husband would not be ok with us going on this trip. He knows it's a time for the kids and I to get out of the house and get to travel, something we normally couldn't afford to do. And since my husband doesn't travel well, and doesn't really groove well with my family, it would be a nice getaway and time apart.

If tables were turned, while I would not like being left behind, if I knew my husband and kids really wanted to go and his family was paying for all expenses, I wouldn't stop them from going and having a good time and I'd actually appreciate the "me time".

I feel like because he doesn't want me to go and because he isn't able to go (jealous?) that he wants to keep us from going, because of his own personal reasons. My kids keep telling me that he tells them, he's probalbly going to say no to the trip, which infuriates me, because it's like he holds it over our heads and the kids don't need to be involved in our discussion. Anytime there is any tension over any issue, and he throws in my face, "Oh great, I can't wait until we talk about the wedding trip"....I don't know what he's waiting for or mulling over, but in my honest opinion, it should be as simple as, Can we afford the costs for food? Do we have the time to take off? Is our schedule open to do this? Are you really wanting to go? Do I trust you? If the answer is yes to these, then I do not see why it is something to mull over for 6 days, let alone 6 months.

And quite honestly, I'm becoming resentful and a great animosity is growing against my husband because I feel like his "decision making" is more of a lordship over me, because of how he handles any decisions he makes. He makes it a big ordeal, thumping me (not literally) over the head with the Bible and how it says husband take the lead, and wives must submit, yadda yadda... And to add in, he's a very selfish person, and has been our entire 20 years together...so I don't believe his decisions are Godly, or selfless, at all, I truly think he makes these decisions for what HE wants, what HE needs and what HE desires, more than anything. And how do I prove that? How do I get around that, while still doing my duty as a submissive wife? Ugh...I'm frustrated. Any advice or thoughts would be appreciated.
Hello, I am curious how married couples deal with decision making in their marriage.

I know what the bible says about the husband being the leader and ultimately, at an impasse, the decision maker...but I'm curious what decisions does he decide? All of them, at every impasse, no matter how big or small the issue?

Or is it just the big ones, that affect the finances or the family as a whole?

The reason I ask is this, and let me know in your family, what you would do, please.

My niece is getting married @ New Years in another state. My whole family is going (my parents, my brother, etc). My 3 kids and I would love to go. But my husband is unable to get the time off work. My kids will be on school break and I have the time I can take off. My parents offered to pay for all expenses, except food, which we'd be paying for no matter where we were.

My husband does not want us to go. Of course, he hasn't given me his answer yet....and it's a touchy subject...but he somehow has a problem with us going. At first it was financial, until he found out my parents were covering costs. Then it became about church, because he's Catholic and didn't want the kids missing any Days of Obligation. But I explained we are traveling after and will be home before, any of those Days. And my nieces wedding is on Sunday in a Catholic church and I already called my husbands Priest and explained the situation and he told me since the wedding is in a Catholic church and will have a mass, the Sunday mass obligation is covered.

I see no logical reason why my husband would not be ok with us going on this trip. He knows it's a time for the kids and I to get out of the house and get to travel, something we normally couldn't afford to do. And since my husband doesn't travel well, and doesn't really groove well with my family, it would be a nice getaway and time apart.

If tables were turned, while I would not like being left behind, if I knew my husband and kids really wanted to go and his family was paying for all expenses, I wouldn't stop them from going and having a good time and I'd actually appreciate the "me time".

I feel like because he doesn't want me to go and because he isn't able to go (jealous?) that he wants to keep us from going, because of his own personal reasons. My kids keep telling me that he tells them, he's probalbly going to say no to the trip, which infuriates me, because it's like he holds it over our heads and the kids don't need to be involved in our discussion. Anytime there is any tension over any issue, and he throws in my face, "Oh great, I can't wait until we talk about the wedding trip"....I don't know what he's waiting for or mulling over, but in my honest opinion, it should be as simple as, Can we afford the costs for food? Do we have the time to take off? Is our schedule open to do this? Are you really wanting to go? Do I trust you? If the answer is yes to these, then I do not see why it is something to mull over for 6 days, let alone 6 months.

And quite honestly, I'm becoming resentful and a great animosity is growing against my husband because I feel like his "decision making" is more of a lordship over me, because of how he handles any decisions he makes. He makes it a big ordeal, thumping me (not literally) over the head with the Bible and how it says husband take the lead, and wives must submit, yadda yadda... And to add in, he's a very selfish person, and has been our entire 20 years together...so I don't believe his decisions are Godly, or selfless, at all, I truly think he makes these decisions for what HE wants, what HE needs and what HE desires, more than anything. And how do I prove that? How do I get around that, while still doing my duty as a submissive wife? Ugh...I'm frustrated. Any advice or thoughts would be appreciated.
Hello, I am curious how married couples deal with decision making in their marriage.

I know what the bible says about the husband being the leader and ultimately, at an impasse, the decision maker...but I'm curious what decisions does he decide? All of them, at every impasse, no matter how big or small the issue?

Or is it just the big ones, that affect the finances or the family as a whole?

The reason I ask is this, and let me know in your family, what you would do, please.

My niece is getting married @ New Years in another state. My whole family is going (my parents, my brother, etc). My 3 kids and I would love to go. But my husband is unable to get the time off work. My kids will be on school break and I have the time I can take off. My parents offered to pay for all expenses, except food, which we'd be paying for no matter where we were.

My husband does not want us to go. Of course, he hasn't given me his answer yet....and it's a touchy subject...but he somehow has a problem with us going. At first it was financial, until he found out my parents were covering costs. Then it became about church, because he's Catholic and didn't want the kids missing any Days of Obligation. But I explained we are traveling after and will be home before, any of those Days. And my nieces wedding is on Sunday in a Catholic church and I already called my husbands Priest and explained the situation and he told me since the wedding is in a Catholic church and will have a mass, the Sunday mass obligation is covered.

I see no logical reason why my husband would not be ok with us going on this trip. He knows it's a time for the kids and I to get out of the house and get to travel, something we normally couldn't afford to do. And since my husband doesn't travel well, and doesn't really groove well with my family, it would be a nice getaway and time apart.

If tables were turned, while I would not like being left behind, if I knew my husband and kids really wanted to go and his family was paying for all expenses, I wouldn't stop them from going and having a good time and I'd actually appreciate the "me time".

I feel like because he doesn't want me to go and because he isn't able to go (jealous?) that he wants to keep us from going, because of his own personal reasons. My kids keep telling me that he tells them, he's probalbly going to say no to the trip, which infuriates me, because it's like he holds it over our heads and the kids don't need to be involved in our discussion. Anytime there is any tension over any issue, and he throws in my face, "Oh great, I can't wait until we talk about the wedding trip"....I don't know what he's waiting for or mulling over, but in my honest opinion, it should be as simple as, Can we afford the costs for food? Do we have the time to take off? Is our schedule open to do this? Are you really wanting to go? Do I trust you? If the answer is yes to these, then I do not see why it is something to mull over for 6 days, let alone 6 months.

And quite honestly, I'm becoming resentful and a great animosity is growing against my husband because I feel like his "decision making" is more of a lordship over me, because of how he handles any decisions he makes. He makes it a big ordeal, thumping me (not literally) over the head with the Bible and how it says husband take the lead, and wives must submit, yadda yadda... And to add in, he's a very selfish person, and has been our entire 20 years together...so I don't believe his decisions are Godly, or selfless, at all, I truly think he makes these decisions for what HE wants, what HE needs and what HE desires, more than anything. And how do I prove that? How do I get around that, while still doing my duty as a submissive wife? Ugh...I'm frustrated. Any advice or thoughts would be appreciated.
 
Upvote 0

CassieShannon

Active Member
May 3, 2018
25
10
37
southeast
✟24,926.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Hello, I am curious how married couples deal with decision making in their marriage.

I know what the bible says about the husband being the leader and ultimately, at an impasse, the decision maker...but I'm curious what decisions does he decide? All of them, at every impasse, no matter how big or small the issue?

Or is it just the big ones, that affect the finances or the family as a whole?

The reason I ask is this, and let me know in your family, what you would do, please.

My niece is getting married @ New Years in another state. My whole family is going (my parents, my brother, etc). My 3 kids and I would love to go. But my husband is unable to get the time off work. My kids will be on school break and I have the time I can take off. My parents offered to pay for all expenses, except food, which we'd be paying for no matter where we were.

My husband does not want us to go. Of course, he hasn't given me his answer yet....and it's a touchy subject...but he somehow has a problem with us going. At first it was financial, until he found out my parents were covering costs. Then it became about church, because he's Catholic and didn't want the kids missing any Days of Obligation. But I explained we are traveling after and will be home before, any of those Days. And my nieces wedding is on Sunday in a Catholic church and I already called my husbands Priest and explained the situation and he told me since the wedding is in a Catholic church and will have a mass, the Sunday mass obligation is covered.

I see no logical reason why my husband would not be ok with us going on this trip. He knows it's a time for the kids and I to get out of the house and get to travel, something we normally couldn't afford to do. And since my husband doesn't travel well, and doesn't really groove well with my family, it would be a nice getaway and time apart.

If tables were turned, while I would not like being left behind, if I knew my husband and kids really wanted to go and his family was paying for all expenses, I wouldn't stop them from going and having a good time and I'd actually appreciate the "me time".

I feel like because he doesn't want me to go and because he isn't able to go (jealous?) that he wants to keep us from going, because of his own personal reasons. My kids keep telling me that he tells them, he's probalbly going to say no to the trip, which infuriates me, because it's like he holds it over our heads and the kids don't need to be involved in our discussion. Anytime there is any tension over any issue, and he throws in my face, "Oh great, I can't wait until we talk about the wedding trip"....I don't know what he's waiting for or mulling over, but in my honest opinion, it should be as simple as, Can we afford the costs for food? Do we have the time to take off? Is our schedule open to do this? Are you really wanting to go? Do I trust you? If the answer is yes to these, then I do not see why it is something to mull over for 6 days, let alone 6 months.

And quite honestly, I'm becoming resentful and a great animosity is growing against my husband because I feel like his "decision making" is more of a lordship over me, because of how he handles any decisions he makes. He makes it a big ordeal, thumping me (not literally) over the head with the Bible and how it says husband take the lead, and wives must submit, yadda yadda... And to add in, he's a very selfish person, and has been our entire 20 years together...so I don't believe his decisions are Godly, or selfless, at all, I truly think he makes these decisions for what HE wants, what HE needs and what HE desires, more than anything. And how do I prove that? How do I get around that, while still doing my duty as a submissive wife? Ugh...I'm frustrated. Any advice or thoughts would be appreciated.



This is a great opportunity to change directions as a family. I would respectfully tell my husband that I wanted to go and believed it would be a good memory for yourself and your children. Spending time with your parents and sharing in the wedding of your niece is not only an honorable
way to celebrate the growth of your extended family, but it also includes the church. If you choose to stay home the animosity between you and your husband will grow. If you go you stand the chance of your husband being angry at you for a time, but this should pass as you are not doing anything "evil". I would also like to recommend the book, Boundaries in Marriage. Both you and your husband need to read this book. It unwinds the sometimes twisted beliefs we have been taught about obedience to our spouses through Biblical clarity.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lucky9
Upvote 0

Lucky9

Active Member
Mar 29, 2017
56
21
Avondale, AZ
✟26,991.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
how did you solve this last year?
did you go to family reunion or not?
seems a similar situation


Husband and Wife Disagreement



if you went last year to reunion, you can say everything turned out fine and it will be fine now, also

We did not end up going last year, because as it turned out my brother nad his family didn't go and I didn't want to take that long trip with just my parents, who ended up shortening the trip anyway. But it was the same stupid argument then too.

Basically, his reasons have gone from financial, to religious to just basically not trusting my family being back in time for our two kids (who go to his Catholic church - which is another long story/decision HE made) to be back in time for the Day of Obligation. And obviously, there's an issue of him trusting me, otherwise, me saying we'll be back on this date, would be enough. These are the reasons he's given so far...we haven't talked about it in real depth, because it is a hot issue. And it infuriates me that it's even an issue, since I literally can't see any logical or rational reason why my kids and I couldn't go on this trip. We have the time off. We have the funds for our portion. My entire family will be there and want us to attend and are willing to pay for a good portion of the expenses for the trip, so that we can. It will not interfere with any of his religious activities. And because he keeps coming up with excuses, and has done so when this has come up before, I fully believe it's just him being controlling and insecure about being alone for 6 days. After all, if I'm totally honest, he has been the most selfish person I have ever met, in all my life and a good portion of our 20 year marriage, has been about "him first", his needs, his wants, his desires, his feelings...then we'll see if I get anything. So, to say this is a small portion of other problems we have, is an under statement.
 
Upvote 0

grasping the after wind

That's grasping after the wind
Jan 18, 2010
19,458
6,355
Clarence Center NY USA
✟245,147.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I don’t believe all of scripture is the word of god. The doctrine of male headship has caused untold abuse and suffering. Women right here on CF have reported abuse under a headship marriage and have been told to stay with the abuser and submit.


I think it is a mistake to decide that the biblical principle is invalid if there are cases where people use the biblical principle as an excuse to do bad things. The biblical principle of headship of the man in marriage requires the man to act fairly and lovingly. It does not give the man carte blanc to do whatever he pleases. There might be people that don't believe giving to the poor should be considered the word of God. They might say it was put there by lazy people looking for a handout and that the biblical principle ought to be disregarded. They might say that there are indeed lazy people that get free stuff because of this wrong teaching. How does their logic in deciding which parts of the Bible to consider valid and which not compare to your own?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lucky9
Upvote 0

mama2one

Well-Known Member
Apr 8, 2018
9,161
9,858
U.S.A.
✟265,203.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
My entire family will be there and want us to attend and are willing to pay for a good portion of the expenses for the trip, so that we can.

don't think he should keep you and the kids from seeing your family

husband is going away to a wedding
don't like him going as he travels so much for work
but wouldn't be right for me to keep him from family
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Lucky9
Upvote 0

Lucky9

Active Member
Mar 29, 2017
56
21
Avondale, AZ
✟26,991.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Lucky9, I had given you quite a bit of advice in your previous thread about this dynamic.

I would still point you back to that advice. Can you re-read my posts on your "Not sure how to resolve this..." thread and comment on it?
I read back thru the other thread and while I do appreciate your advice, the problem I have is that I believe that my husband is emotionally (and somewhat mentally) unstable. Just the mere discussion of separation, and he flipped his lid. Yelling, stomping around, slamming things, calling me names, cursing at me, etc. There's no way to have any kind of conversation with this man, in a rational, sane way, if he feels hurt or rejected in any way. I realize, it's another way of manipulating and coercing me to back down and relent, but I'm on the fence with this marriage and I feel like I am in a catch-22 situation.

Its so easy for those on the outside to say, just leave him. Or just lock him out. But it's not that simple. If I locked him out, as you've suggested, I have visions of how eratic he could be. Being locked out without any conversation before hand, without any notice, treating him with such disrespect, after 20 years of marriage, I imagine him going balistic and probably doing harm to a door or window to get in. He's never been physically violent, but he has thrown things and slammed things and he reacts terribly, whenever he feels the slightest hurt. In fact, that seems to be his go to emotion, whenever anything it out of his control....anger. He's never been taught and has never learned, how to handle it and control his temper. Do i think he'd ever hit me? No. But do I think he'll break some thing or do damage to some thing? Yes. His verbal tirade is enough to scare me. And sure I could call the cops and report him, yadda yadda, but the very idea of that chaos, is what is keeping me from pulling the lever. I'm sitting here wondering what's worse, his random abuse or the absolute chaos that would ensue, if I left him or locked him out?

Granted, I agree, abuse is not good, in any measure. And we have had discussions about it, and he has acknowledged his behaviors and treatment of me. And since I brought up "separation" the last time we had a heart to heart, even though he bristled at it, he has been trying harder to make changes and do better. But he still has control issues and what I feel to be "authoritative" issues, wherein he uses the Bible and scripture out of context, in order to push this "headship" he deems to have.

He won't go to therapy unless it's an SSPX Catholic priest doing the therapy (eye roll here). I feel that is unfair to me...since I question whether a Priest would truly understand the dynamics of "marriage" and the life issues spouses deal with, when they've never been married themselves. But even though I'm still willing to go to one, it doesn't matter, when there isn't anyone at his church who has availability to "counsel" us. And, he refuses to go to anyone at MY church, because..."heretics" and all. Nor will he agree to anyone outside his church, who happens to be Christian. Hence why I come here for advice and counsel, because I'm sitting here thinking, this is crazy. I've always believed marriage to be a team, a partnership, working together for the Glory of God...lifting each other up, serving each other, putting their happiness above ours, etc. And I try very hard to live that out...but meanwhile, I feel like he takes advantage of me and I feel he does more taking, than giving, in our marriage. And I wish I could get him to see the many things all of you have said on here about "headship" and "submission", without getting into an argument, because he always thinks HE is right and his church's interpretation is right...and us "protestants" are the ones who cherry pick scriptures.
 
Upvote 0

Lucky9

Active Member
Mar 29, 2017
56
21
Avondale, AZ
✟26,991.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So, let me ask this, to all those who agree I should just go, since my husband is currently in the mindset that he gets to decide if he's going to "let me" and the kids go, or not, and we have yet to discuss the pros and cons, etc to come to a final decision, how do I respectfully let him know that I'm going (with the kids), regardless of what he says/thinks? I have to admit, the whole "I'm letting you go or not" attitude, has me enraged.

Let me be clear, if I go, I go with our kids, not by myself. There's no way I want to leave my kids behind, when there is absolutlely no logical reason why they can't go with me. They are just as excited as I am, about this chance to get away, go on a trip and enjoy family time with my family.

But I fear talking to him and telling him straight out, "This is what I'm doing, and I know you don't like it, but I'm an adult and this is my family. And it means a lot to me and them, that the kids and I attend". Remember, the way he usually responds and reacts to things like this - being challenged, not getting hit sway, etc, he doesn't respond rationally, so I often feel no matter how rational I am, he just doesn't get it, because he disagrees and that's all he sees.

I have a feeling I'm going to get his counter argument, that they are his kids too, and he feels they shouldn't go. How do I counteract whatever argument he throws in here, because as their dad, he does have a right to decide what they do. So at what point am I able to say, tough, they are coming with me, deal with it, in a respectful yet stern way?
 
Upvote 0

Sparagmos

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2018
8,632
7,319
53
Portland, Oregon
✟285,562.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I think it is a mistake to decide that the biblical principle is invalid if there are cases where people use the biblical principle as an excuse to do bad things.
Its invalid because in every case it diminishes the value of women and limits their potential as human beings.
There might be people that don't believe giving to the poor should be considered the word of God. They might say it was put there by lazy people looking for a handout and that the biblical principle ought to be disregarded. They might say that there are indeed lazy people that get free stuff because of this wrong teaching. How does their logic in deciding which parts of the Bible to consider valid and which not compare to your own?
We all use subjective reasoning when evaluating the Bible. There’s nothing logical about accepting all of the Bible as somehow equal in value, since it was written by a multitude of different men with different philosophies at different times dealing with different issues. Wise words produce good fruit when put to the test.
 
Upvote 0

Sparagmos

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2018
8,632
7,319
53
Portland, Oregon
✟285,562.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
So, let me ask this, to all those who agree I should just go, since my husband is currently in the mindset that he gets to decide if he's going to "let me" and the kids go, or not, and we have yet to discuss the pros and cons, etc to come to a final decision, how do I respectfully let him know that I'm going (with the kids), regardless of what he says/thinks? I have to admit, the whole "I'm letting you go or not" attitude, has me enraged.

Let me be clear, if I go, I go with our kids, not by myself. There's no way I want to leave my kids behind, when there is absolutlely no logical reason why they can't go with me. They are just as excited as I am, about this chance to get away, go on a trip and enjoy family time with my family.

But I fear talking to him and telling him straight out, "This is what I'm doing, and I know you don't like it, but I'm an adult and this is my family. And it means a lot to me and them, that the kids and I attend". Remember, the way he usually responds and reacts to things like this - being challenged, not getting hit sway, etc, he doesn't respond rationally, so I often feel no matter how rational I am, he just doesn't get it, because he disagrees and that's all he sees.

I have a feeling I'm going to get his counter argument, that they are his kids too, and he feels they shouldn't go. How do I counteract whatever argument he throws in here, because as their dad, he does have a right to decide what they do. So at what point am I able to say, tough, they are coming with me, deal with it, in a respectful yet stern way?
Sounds like you are getting stronger in your resolve, good for you:). I don’t have kids but I know a bit about standing up to abusive authority and moving from a place of powerlessness to equality. I’m glad to hear you don’t think he will hit you. You are probably right. But it will need to get worse temporarily for it to get better. I would suggest giving him the news in a public place, and with a friend/ witness present. That way if he blows up you won’t feel trapped and you can walk away after you tell him, giving both of you time to cool off. Prepare yourself for the worst, and you will be able to weather it. It is very important when dealing with abusive authoritarians not to get into an argument or try to get them to be rational and “see your side” of things. They only respond to actions, force, and real threats of consequences. Just tell him what you intend to do, and if you want you can tell him what will happen if he does x, y, or z. Like, “if you try to harm me, I will call the police” or, “if you try to stop me and the kids from going, we’re moving out.” Ultimatums are necessary in these situations. I’d also make a worst case scenario plan so that if he goes nuts you know exactly where you are going and what your next step is.
 
Upvote 0

Endeavourer

Well-Known Member
Aug 30, 2017
1,712
1,469
Cloud 9
✟97,419.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Just the mere discussion of separation, and he flipped his lid. Yelling, stomping around, slamming things, calling me names, cursing at me, etc. There's no way to have any kind of conversation with this man, in a rational, sane way, if he feels hurt or rejected in any way.
I realize, it's another way of manipulating and coercing me to back down and relent

You got it. It's up to you whether you allow/enable these tactics or shut them down.

Its so easy for those on the outside to say, just leave him. Or just lock him out. But it's not that simple.

Sister, I KNOW this. I was in your shoes. Looking back, the BEST thing I could have done was draw a boundary and lock him out or leave him so he could understand his road of abuse had come to an end. Had I done that my marriage might have been saved. Instead, I was too paralyzed with fright to take this option, my xH was never motivated to change and ultimately our marriage had to end.

If I could go back to redo one thing in my life, it would have been to lock my husband out after one of his frightful tantrums, early on. If that happened after every tantrum he'd stop throwing them.

If I locked him out... treating him with such disrespect, after 20 years of marriage,

Well HE certainly doesn't worry about respecting you. He browbeats, abuses and dominates you under the pretext of godliness.

I imagine him going balistic and probably doing harm to a door or window to get in.

Call the cops if this happens.

he reacts terribly, whenever he feels the slightest hurt.

I call BS on this. He reacts terribly whenever he doesn't get his way. He pretends "hurt" but it's really just a temper tantrum.

has never learned, how to handle it and control his temper.

Unfortunate for him, but you don't have to be subject to this. He can act like a decent man or he can throw a temper tantrum by himself. Some Motel 6 therapy is just the thing he needs.

But do I think he'll break some thing or do damage to some thing? Yes. His verbal tirade is enough to scare me. And sure I could call the cops and report him, yadda yadda, but the very idea of that chaos, is what is keeping me from pulling the lever.

As you said: "I realize, it's another way of manipulating and coercing me to back down and relent"

wondering what's worse, his random abuse or the absolute chaos that would ensue, if I left him or locked him out?

The random, persistent and controlling abuse will last for the rest of your life. The absolute chaos would run itself out shortly. After having once chosen 25 years of abuse, if I could do it over again, I'd chose the chaos.

he has been trying harder to make changes and do better.
He says this ^^ but yet the statement below belies his change. It is just temporary until he senses he's out of the woods and can go back to being who he is.

wherein he uses the Bible and scripture out of context, in order to push this "headship" he deems to have.

You can say "Dear Husband, I cannot agree with your interpretation here. From now on, I need a marriage of mutual and extraordinary care of each other. If you don't want to give and receive this, that's up to you, but I will settle for nothing less."

He won't go to therapy unless it's an SSPX Catholic priest doing the therapy (eye roll here). I feel that is unfair to me...since I question whether a Priest would truly understand the dynamics of "marriage" and the life issues spouses deal with, when they've never been married themselves. But even though I'm still willing to go to one, it doesn't matter, when there isn't anyone at his church who has availability to "counsel" us. And, he refuses to go to anyone at MY church, because..."heretics" and all. Nor will he agree to anyone outside his church, who happens to be Christian.

Well, this may have saved you a lot of heartache. I'm sad to say but my experience is that much church based marital counseling protects the perpetrator at the expense of the victim. You know that cycle well. You, too, have protected the perpetrator at your expense. The perpetrators are bullies, and are often charismatic enough that they charm pastors into siding with them or the pastor will have a price to pay. SOME pastors are great, but so many are not that I've found as a whole, more harm has been done than good by referring someone to their pastor.

Hence why I come here for advice and counsel, because I'm sitting here thinking, this is crazy.

Yes, it is crazy. You can see that. You have been posting here for a long time without daring to effect any change. In fact, the situation seems to be deteriorating. Now you're being controlled into ceding all of the children to his faith when before at least they were allowed to participate with yours. Further, his labeling of you as a heretic is unconscionable. The definition of "heretic" is a divider, and he is being the divider.

I've always believed marriage to be a team, a partnership, working together for the Glory of God...lifting each other up, serving each other, putting their happiness above ours, etc.

Yes, this is possible. It would be a joy filled marriage. I have a marriage like that today.

And I try very hard to live that out...but meanwhile, I feel like he takes advantage of me and I feel he does more taking, than giving, in our marriage.

When one person's taker (perpetrator) coerces the other person's giver, the coerced person eventually falls out of love with the perpetrator.

The Giver & Taker (Marriage Builders®, Inc.)
The Policy of Joint Agreement (Marriage Builders®, Inc.)

And I wish I could get him to see the many things all of you have said on here about "headship" and "submission", without getting into an argument, because he always thinks HE is right and his church's interpretation is right...and us "protestants" are the ones who cherry pick scriptures.

Making a judgement on the other person's beliefs is disrespectful. It's a way to coerce them into giving the perpetrator his way. The anatomy of a temper tantrum is usually like this:

Normal behavior of an abuser:
--makes a selfish demand
--throws disrespectful judgements at the person who doesn't give in to the selfish demand
--anger outbursts follow when disrespect still didn't give the perpetrator his/her way

A progression that indicates HIGH likelihood of danger (not the "typical' abusers but in w very dangerous category of abusers)
--throwing things/violence to expand the anger outbursts
- puts his/her hands on the person to emphasize their demands
--hits the other person
--badly injures or kills the other person

IF your husband has progressed passed the normal categories, he is capable of going the full distance. Many women have lost their lives when their husband would "only" throw things and suddenly his next escalation was to kill her. If he's in this category, you need to be aware that taking action to stick up for yourself could get you killed, and plan carefully, accordingly.

I'd recommend you post for step by step assistance in the forums at marriagebuilders.com. Their methodology and assistance will be in support of the advice I gave you here. Generally you'll tell your husband of the changes you need from him and give him two weeks of "Plan A" behavior - being the best wife you know how to be while you await him to make these changes. At the end of two weeks, if he has shown he is not interested in stepping up to be a good husband, you lock him out (or leave him) with a note that says "I love you very much and want to be married to you for the rest of my life, but I can't continue to be treated like this ... etc etc etc." The note will lay out the conditions for his return.

I can't remember the specifics of whether he has laid hands on you, but if he has, it is usually best to skip the 2 weeks and go straight to the note and the locks.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Sparagmos
Upvote 0

Lucky9

Active Member
Mar 29, 2017
56
21
Avondale, AZ
✟26,991.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I can't remember the specifics of whether he has laid hands on you, but if he has, it is usually best to skip the 2 weeks and go straight to the note and the locks.

No, he's never laid hands on me. And it's been a good while since he's thrown anything or been physically intimidating. And to be honest, he hasn't yelled or raised his voice to me, for well over 6 months. It's his attitude and the way he talks to me, things he expects of me and his general twisting of our roles as husband/wife, that is the problem, more so than the "abuse".

But I hear what you are saying. It's just easier said, than done.
 
  • Friendly
Reactions: Endeavourer
Upvote 0

St_Worm2

Simul Justus et Peccator
Site Supporter
Jan 28, 2002
28,130
45,782
68
✟3,102,302.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
He won't go to therapy unless it's an SSPX Catholic priest doing the therapy (eye roll here). I feel that is unfair to me...since I question whether a Priest would truly understand the dynamics of "marriage" and the life issues spouses deal with, when they've never been married themselves. But even though I'm still willing to go to one, it doesn't matter, when there isn't anyone at his church who has availability to "counsel" us. And, he refuses to go to anyone at MY church, because..."heretics" and all. Nor will he agree to anyone outside his church, who happens to be Christian. Hence why I come here for advice and counsel, because I'm sitting here thinking, this is crazy.
Hi Lucky9, coming here to discuss things is an okay thing to do, of course, but my advice would be to seek out your pastor's counsel without your husband. Unlike us here at CF, he knows you (and he knows your husband too, yes?). So, go see him and be as transparent as you can with him about this and everything else that's been going on in your marriage, and see what he has to say. After all, it's your pastor who the Lord has tasked as His underservant to keep watch over your soul/your spiritual well-being on this side of Glory .. Hebrews 13:17.

You can also keep him updated so that he'll know the specific things that you'd like to have him praying about.

Continuing to pray for you (and for you all).

--David
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lapidarius
Upvote 0

grasping the after wind

That's grasping after the wind
Jan 18, 2010
19,458
6,355
Clarence Center NY USA
✟245,147.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Its invalid because in every case it diminishes the value of women and limits their potential as human beings.

You would have to show the evidence for this before I would accept it as a valid conclusion. I do not see it as anywhere near self evident that simply putting one's trust in one's spouse , when that spouse is sincerely attempting to do the right thing and take into consideration the wishes of his wife even above his own wishes as God requires of husbands in the biblical principle we are discussing, diminishes anyone's value or limits their potential in any way.

We all use subjective reasoning when evaluating the Bible. There’s nothing logical about accepting all of the Bible as somehow equal in value, since it was written by a multitude of different men with different philosophies at different times dealing with different issues. Wise words produce good fruit when put to the test.

Though you did not directly answer my question, can I take this as an admission that the logic concerning the validity of biblical principles used by both yourself and in my example are exactly the same? i.e. if you don't agree with it, it is invalid, if you do agree then, it is wise and will produce good fruit?
 
Upvote 0

Sparagmos

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2018
8,632
7,319
53
Portland, Oregon
✟285,562.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You would have to show the evidence for this before I would accept it as a valid conclusion. I do not see it as anywhere near self evident that simply putting one's trust in one's spouse , when that spouse is sincerely attempting to do the right thing and take into consideration the wishes of his wife even above his own wishes as God requires of husbands in the biblical principle we are discussing, diminishes anyone's value or limits their potential in any way.
What you describe is not headship as it is practiced. No one that I’m aware of teaches headship as a choice a woman makes to put her trust in her spouse, but only if he is “sincerely attempting to do the right thing and take into consideration the wishes of his wife above his own wishes....”. Her submission is not conditional on his selfless leadership. Not that it matters - inherent in the idea that men should make the decisions is the idea of male superiority, an ideology held by church leaders for centuries that is well documented. When the Bible was written, and well into the 20th century, women were considered less wise, less intelligent, more sinful, untrustworthy, and dirty. They were not allowed to hold property or vote. When they worked, they were required to give their husbands their wages, essentially making them slaves. They were considered property of the husband. They had no parental rights. They were not allowed to attend school and become educated. Marital rape was legal. They were basically forced to reproduce and before birth control was widely available many women lived in fear of the next pregnancy and dying in childbirth. The doctrine of headship came from this oppressive patriarchal view and the complementarian focus on husbands loving their wives is a recent phenomenon. As for evidence, history is full of it and if you’d like resources I can recommend some books or a women’s studies class.

Though you did not directly answer my question, can I take this as an admission that the logic concerning the validity of biblical principles used by both yourself and in my example are exactly the same? i.e. if you don't agree with it, it is invalid, if you do agree then, it is wise and will produce good fruit?

No, I don’t think we all apply the same logic to interpreting the Bible. I don’t think most people use logic at all. I can only speak for myself as far as how I evaluate any teaching or philosophy, but even then humans mostly use emotion, not logic, in spiritual and religious matters. I studied religion and philosophy for about 25 years (starting with my father’s theology books when I was 9), and with everything I look at the effect of that teaching, does it do good and alleviate suffering? Are the people who promote the teaching able to follow it for the most part? Are the people who follow that teaching known to be at least a bit happier and kinder than average? Any philosophy or religious system is only as valuable as it is effectively carried out. That is how I evaluate things but many christians, like my minister father, say if it’s in the Bible, it is true and good and the word of god, because it’s in the Bible. That is an “appeal to authority,” widely understood to be a logical fallacy. Many Christians have never studied church history and don’t know who wrote the books of the Bible or know about the political process by which the church selected which writings would be deemed the word of god.
 
Upvote 0

NothingIsImpossible

Well-Known Member
May 22, 2015
5,618
3,253
✟289,942.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Since he's good at throwing verses at you maybe you tell him about:

Ephesians 5:25 “For husbands, this means love your wives, just as Christ loved the church. He gave up his life for her."

Ephesians 5:21: “Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ."


Ephesians 4:32: “Be kind to each other, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, just as God through Christ has forgiven you."

Is he loving you like Christ loves the church? Is he submitting to you also? Is he being kind? Is he encouraging you? Doesn't sound like it. I find to often men get on a power trip about the husband being "in control". Yet they fail to realize the bible doesn't say your wife is a slave who must obey everything you say. Because if he is that way, then he is sinning but not loving you like Christ loves the church.

I was always raised with the husband more or less should lead the wife spiritually. For example I've been lacking in praying WITH my wife, reading WITH my wife...etc. So I am failing her on that end. Now in general neither of us controls the other. We do things together. We are equals. When one of us wants something we ask the other one and decide together.

Honestly I haven't really heard of a catholic believing in the "man rules the woman" thing. Usually I see that among some baptists.
 
Upvote 0

grasping the after wind

That's grasping after the wind
Jan 18, 2010
19,458
6,355
Clarence Center NY USA
✟245,147.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What you describe is not headship as it is practiced. No one that I’m aware of teaches headship as a choice a woman makes to put her trust in her spouse, but only if he is “sincerely attempting to do the right thing and take into consideration the wishes of his wife above his own wishes....”. Her submission is not conditional on his selfless leadership. Not that it matters - inherent in the idea that men should make the decisions is the idea of male superiority, an ideology held by church leaders for centuries that is well documented. When the Bible was written, and well into the 20th century, women were considered less wise, less intelligent, more sinful, untrustworthy, and dirty. They were not allowed to hold property or vote. When they worked, they were required to give their husbands their wages, essentially making them slaves. They were considered property of the husband. They had no parental rights. They were not allowed to attend school and become educated. Marital rape was legal. They were basically forced to reproduce and before birth control was widely available many women lived in fear of the next pregnancy and dying in childbirth. The doctrine of headship came from this oppressive patriarchal view and the complementarian focus on husbands loving their wives is a recent phenomenon. As for evidence, history is full of it and if you’d like resources I can recommend some books or a women’s studies class.

The Bible teaches what I described. If a person decided that 1 plus 1 equaled 4 would you contend that the principles of mathematics were invalid? If one does something other than what the principle is described as, I would contend that the person is not in line with the principle rather than that the principle is invalid. Neither history nor, of all things, a women's studies class would be able to provide evidence that a biblical principle was invalid. Don't confuse people's actions with a biblical principle that they fail to adhere to. The biblical principle is not about a woman's choice or requirement to submit herself to a man or be forced to submit to that man it is about making a family work in harmony with each other. In any situation there needs to be one person that has the ultimate responsibility for decision making. If everyone insists upon having things their own way then the family doesn't work. The biblical principle is that the man is given that ultimate responsibility in a Christian marriage with the requirement that the man must first love the woman and the children to the point of considering their welfare above his own. That is actually a common Christian theme throughout the New Testament that applies to every relationship no matter who is making decisions. We are instructed to love others as much as we love ourselves to even love our enemies. If we are married to someone, why would we then put our desires above our spouse
needs and wants? If a husband or wife is more concerned with who is making the final decision or what they might gain by being the one that makes the final decision they are violating God's biblical principle. If someone doesn't like the Christian biblical principle of putting one's spouse's welfare before one's own then they have a number of options. They have the options of not being married, not being a Christian, not following biblical principles at all, picking what ever biblical principles they prefer and ignoring the others or they could try to put God's desires above their own. AFAIK there are very few ways to determine God's desires . One would be direct revelation another would be to trust that there is some revelation that others have received that are considered to be authoritative. I highly doubt that cherry picking is a reliable way to determine what God wants.
 
Upvote 0

Sparagmos

Well-Known Member
Oct 19, 2018
8,632
7,319
53
Portland, Oregon
✟285,562.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
The Bible teaches what I described. If a person decided that 1 plus 1 equaled 4 would you contend that the principles of mathematics were invalid? If one does something other than what the principle is described as, I would contend that the person is not in line with the principle rather than that the principle is invalid. Neither history nor, of all things, a women's studies class would be able to provide evidence that a biblical principle was invalid. Don't confuse people's actions with a biblical principle that they fail to adhere to. The biblical principle is not about a woman's choice or requirement to submit herself to a man or be forced to submit to that man it is about making a family work in harmony with each other. In any situation there needs to be one person that has the ultimate responsibility for decision making. If everyone insists upon having things their own way then the family doesn't work. The biblical principle is that the man is given that ultimate responsibility in a Christian marriage with the requirement that the man must first love the woman and the children to the point of considering their welfare above his own. That is actually a common Christian theme throughout the New Testament that applies to every relationship no matter who is making decisions. We are instructed to love others as much as we love ourselves to even love our enemies. If we are married to someone, why would we then put our desires above our spouse
needs and wants? If a husband or wife is more concerned with who is making the final decision or what they might gain by being the one that makes the final decision they are violating God's biblical principle. If someone doesn't like the Christian biblical principle of putting one's spouse's welfare before one's own then they have a number of options. They have the options of not being married, not being a Christian, not following biblical principles at all, picking what ever biblical principles they prefer and ignoring the others or they could try to put God's desires above their own. AFAIK there are very few ways to determine God's desires . One would be direct revelation another would be to trust that there is some revelation that others have received that are considered to be authoritative. I highly doubt that cherry picking is a reliable way to determine what God wants.
Your response in no way addresses my challenges to your view of headship. You can talk all you want about what headship is supposed to be, but time and time again we see that the doctrine attracts men who don’t think women are equals and want to control them. The result is often suffering and abuse. A god who ordained such a thing would be evil, not good.
 
Upvote 0

Lucky9

Active Member
Mar 29, 2017
56
21
Avondale, AZ
✟26,991.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I realize the question has ultimately been asked and answered, but the dynamic I find myself in, is how do I counter argue my husbands line of reasoning (or as I feel, lack of therein), that because it's me wanting to travel with our kids, to two states away, that is a big enough reason he has for standing in my way of going.

Is that even a valid, rational argument, because I feel like I'm a grown adult woman, who is quite capable of driving two, three and even four states away, and I'm not incompetant or unable to take care of myself or my kids, not to mention I'm not traveling alone. So the whole "safety" defense, he's trying to build, as his reason for holding me back, doesn't hold water to me.

Sure, I can just pack up the kids and go. But I hate being disrespectful, no matter how disrespectful I feel he's being to me. Two wrongs don't make a right, kind of thing. So I'm trying to figure out how to counter his reasonings...because I just don't think they are totally valid here. I feel he's grasping at straws to bear his weight over this and he refuses to understand true biblical principals regarding the whole "final decision trump card" not being good for any marriage. He still thinks he has that right, when we can't agree on these "big" decisions. And I already know, his decision is going to be HIS way. He's already said as much, that he says no he doesn't want me going, unless I can give him a good valid reason to do so. I've alreadu said, it's my family, it's a wedding of my family member, I need this trip, the kids need this trip, it's paid for, we have the time off, what more reason does he need? He'll say he's listening to me and taking my counsel into advisement, but he is just giving me lip service, so he can say he did so. If he really cared about scripture, and Gods words, and being Christ-like, I feel that he would put my needs over his, IMHO, he'd shut up and give myself and our kids his blessings to go. I don't think me submitting to his wishes that none of us go, for the reasons he is stating, is truly honoring God, when I know he's just wanting his way - and to control.

And did I say, this is a man who is so insecure, that I know he thinks that my family is going to spend the whole time talking about him behind his back and making jokes at his expense. That won't happen, and hasn't happened when he hasn't been there, because my family is actually perfectly happy not to think about him at all. But he's such a narcissist that he thinks if he is there, that won't happen and he also thinks, when he can't be there, he'll keep us from going too, so then it won't happen.
 
Upvote 0