• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

CSA Flag varient to stay in Mississippi

dogs4thewin

dog lover
Christian Forums Staff
Red Team - Moderator
CF Ambassadors
Site Supporter
Apr 19, 2012
32,805
6,405
Georgia U.S. State
✟1,121,254.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Glad Mississippi didn't bow to political correctness. If the people want to keep the flag as is, then the politicians and activists shouldn't be able to force it to be changed.
Thank you. The people of Miss. seem to be OK with that flag so why should we not be. If a person does not like that there are 49 other states to choose from you do not have to reside within the state lines.
 
Upvote 0

Aryeh Jay

Replaced by a robot, just like Biden.
Site Supporter
Jul 19, 2012
17,646
16,283
MI - Michigan
✟670,851.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Getting back to the OP, I wish Mississippi would elect to have the Bonny Blue Flag as its state flag. It is very pretty and maybe everyone would calm down.

Until someone notices it is the current flag of Somalia. I’ll bet that will get some conversation going.
 
Upvote 0

grandvizier1006

I don't use this anymore, but I still follow Jesus
Site Supporter
Dec 2, 2014
5,976
2,599
30
MS
✟715,718.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
As an MS native I'm used to this sort of thing. The establishment politicians here have to pander to rednecks and whatnot. We HAD another flag with a much more fitting design, but if/when a voter initiative comes up to change it, the state legislature--a (white) Republican supermajority--will probably have a bunch of crappy-looking alternatives and not pick the Magnolia flag.
 
Upvote 0

grandvizier1006

I don't use this anymore, but I still follow Jesus
Site Supporter
Dec 2, 2014
5,976
2,599
30
MS
✟715,718.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
It is very sad that the Lost Cause movement of the South is still alive after so many years, I wish it would just die and everyone would know the causes of the war without resorting to tactics that say the CSA Flag doesn't represent racism and slavery wasn't actually a key factor for the war.

I wonder what is taught in Mississippi schools about the civil war. Hopefully.....pardon the pun, they don't "whitewash" the actual reasons why the southern states turned against the USA.
If I remembered what we were taught, then I'd tell you, but I'd say it was fairly objective.
 
Upvote 0

grandvizier1006

I don't use this anymore, but I still follow Jesus
Site Supporter
Dec 2, 2014
5,976
2,599
30
MS
✟715,718.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I think we've had this discussion before. Symbols have associated meaning, but it's important to remember that that's all it is. They don't have inherent meaning.

That said, much as I personally like the Confederate flag and admire the martial accomplishments of the South, and as much as I acknowledge that slavery wasn't the ONLY issue in the Rebellion, and that there were black Confederate soldiers, and yada yada yada... I still think any intellectually honest person can see why keeping the a Confederate emblem as part of a state and governments iconography is a bad idea and sends a racist message.
I didn't expect you to have a balanced view of the subject. Very nicely said. :thumbsup:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Armoured
Upvote 0

Aryeh Jay

Replaced by a robot, just like Biden.
Site Supporter
Jul 19, 2012
17,646
16,283
MI - Michigan
✟670,851.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
When I took Mississippi history in the 9th grade at Alexander Jr High School in Brookhaven, Mississippi, way back in 1986-87, it was very balanced about the Civil War and Reconstruction. Nothing was whitewashed. I don’t know about today’s text books.
 
Upvote 0

Aryeh Jay

Replaced by a robot, just like Biden.
Site Supporter
Jul 19, 2012
17,646
16,283
MI - Michigan
✟670,851.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Thank you. The people of Miss. seem to be OK with that flag so why should we not be. If a person does not like that there are 49 other states to choose from you do not have to reside within the state lines.
49 or 56? :eek:
 
Upvote 0

Tallguy88

We shall see the King when he comes!
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2009
32,478
7,728
Parts Unknown
✟263,106.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
When I took Mississippi history in the 9th grade at Alexander Jr High School in Brookhaven, Mississippi, way back in 1986-87, it was very balanced about the Civil War and Reconstruction. Nothing was whitewashed. I don’t know about today’s text books.
It was the same when I took US history in HS and University in Arkansas. Slavery was indeed the prime cause of secession. Yet the war itself wasn't fought over slavery, from either Northern or Southern perspective. If that had been the issue, too few people would have fought. The North fought to preserve the Union, but Linciln waited for the South to fire the first shot, which Gen. Beauregard did at Ft. Sumpter. The South fought to defend itself from the subsequent invading Northern Army. It's telling that four states (Virginia, Arkansas, North Carolina, and Tennessee) seceded only after Lincoln called for troops to invade the South. Prior to that, those states were ambivalent about secession.

Beauregard should have been hanged by the South for for starting the war.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Aryeh Jay

Replaced by a robot, just like Biden.
Site Supporter
Jul 19, 2012
17,646
16,283
MI - Michigan
✟670,851.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
It was the same when I took US history in HS and University in Arkansas. Slavery was indeed the prime cause of secession. Yet the war itself wasn't fought over slavery, from either Northern or Southern perspective. If that had been the issue, too few people would have fought. The North fought to preserve the Union, but Linciln waited for the South to fire the first shot, which Gen. Beauregard did at Ft. Sumpter. The South fought to defend itself from the subsequent invading Northern Army. It's telling that four states (Florida, Arkansas, North Carolina, and Tennessee) seceded only after Lincoln called for troops to invade the South. Prior to that, those states were ambivalent about secession.

Beauregard should have been hanged by the South for for starting the war.

Sorry, it was Virginia, not Florida. Florida was the third one to leave. :oops:


It is interesting to note that Arkansas voted to stay in the union several times, until Ft Sumter that is.
 
Upvote 0

HannahT

Newbie
Site Supporter
Apr 9, 2013
6,028
2,423
✟504,470.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Glad Mississippi didn't bow to political correctness. If the people want to keep the flag as is, then the politicians and activists shouldn't be able to force it to be changed.

And they shouldn't complain when people call them racists.

The above is why this discussion never goes anywhere. You have two sides that seem to feel being stubborn, and accusatory is the way to go in debating the subject.

I have absolutely no use for the flag myself. It can be seen as derogatory due to our countries history, and YES it can be seen as a sense of heritage that has nothing to do at all with racism. Yet, the new lines of war have been drawn because its the mature way of handing things. Sigh.

Today? Finding ways of dividing the country into more and more separate groups, and encourage fighting among those groups is suppose to be seen as the SANE way of doing business today.

I personally feel the whole thing is stupid, because all you hear is screaming...with no substance to help the circumstance at all. Gesh - acting like divas doesn't get anyone anywhere! Check history beyond bigotry and racism...and you will find that theme repeated constantly. Do human's not learn or what?!

I don't feel the confederate flag should be part of a state flag. That should be common sense, and should have drawed on people years ago. To me - its a respect thing. Deal with your heritage personally. You represent the entire state's population afterall. Yet, making manufacturing companies STOP making the flag...because we must DRAW them into the most current temper tantrum instead of negotiating is over the top too.

So, you have two sides that refuse to acknowledge the other's point of view. Yeah. That will solve things in a positive manner. So, when is this magic cure of behavior that can't debate going to erase the groups of PC people and racists?
 
Upvote 0

SummerMadness

Senior Veteran
Mar 8, 2006
18,204
11,834
✟340,966.00
Faith
Catholic
The above is why this discussion never goes anywhere. You have two sides that seem to feel being stubborn, and accusatory is the way to go in debating the subject.
You cannot separate the Confederacy from its racist past. The problem with people waving around the Confederate flag is they deny it has any connection to racism, that is patently absurd. Trying to turn this into a "both sides are wrong" argument is ridiculous as you are constructing a false equivalence. It's not about one side simply wanting heritage, it's about claiming heritage while ignoring the hate. The Confederacy had slavery at its cornerstone, it was in all the state constitutions, it was the topic with the heaviest modification in the CSA Constitution. It was referenced in speeches by politicians, it was referenced in letters by Confederate troops. Following the dissolution of the Confederacy, former Confederate soldiers formed the KKK and began a decades long campaign of terrorism against African Americans. The Confederacy was heavily referenced in response to desegregation efforts. This is the history, these are the facts. When people turn around and claim the flag has no connection to racism or oppression, it is a lie. It is no different than someone saying the Nazi flag has no connection to the Holocaust.

This is not a "two sides" argument, saying otherwise is being intellectually dishonest and is nothing more than false equivalence.

I have absolutely no use for the flag myself. It can be seen as derogatory due to our countries history, and YES it can be seen as a sense of heritage that has nothing to do at all with racism. Yet, the new lines of war have been drawn because its the mature way of handing things. Sigh.
How so? Southern heritage? How can they call it that when so many African Americans disagree? States' rights? But that's connected to institution of slavery. Simply to honor Southern soldiers? And what were they fighting for? The issue is not their pride, it's the denial and lying about history.

I don't feel the confederate flag should be part of a state flag. That should be common sense, and should have drawed on people years ago. To me - its a respect thing. Deal with your heritage personally. You represent the entire state's population afterall. Yet, making manufacturing companies STOP making the flag...because we must DRAW them into the most current temper tantrum instead of negotiating is over the top too.
You're making things up now, nowhere in this thread or the linked stories is there an effort "make" companies stop manufacturing the flag. That is a complete lie.

I have a friend who had family that fought for the Confederacy, he has familial pride, but he doesn't deny what the Confederacy fought for.

So, you have two sides that refuse to acknowledge the other's point of view. Yeah. That will solve things in a positive manner. So, when is this magic cure of behavior that can't debate going to erase the groups of PC people and racists?
The view that the Confederacy has nothing to do with racism is a lie, that is not political correctness. Denying history because it's inconvenient is dishonest and disrespectful to the many people hurt by those who used the flag as their standard bearer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Desk trauma
Upvote 0

South Bound

I stand with Israel.
Jan 3, 2014
4,443
1,034
✟46,159.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Good. And good for Mississippi for standing up to these idiots.

[QUOTE="HannahT]I don't feel the confederate flag should be part of a state flag. That should be common sense, and should have drawed on people years ago. To me - its a respect thing. Deal with your heritage personally. You represent the entire state's population afterall[/quote]

And some Mississippians aren't Southerners? Which Mississippians do you believe it doesn't represent?

So, you have two sides that refuse to acknowledge the other's point of view.

I acknowledge that they have a point of view. I just don't care. I don't believe their "point of view" supersedes my history or my right to celebrate our history and our culture.

To be honest with you, I'm really starting to get tired of the blacks' constant whining. They don't own the country, they don't own our history, and, last time I checked, they're still in the minority.
 
Upvote 0

Tallguy88

We shall see the King when he comes!
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2009
32,478
7,728
Parts Unknown
✟263,106.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
It is interesting to note that Arkansas voted to stay in the union several times, until Ft Sumter that is.
Yes, exactly. The last vote was to wait an see what happens, then come back and vote on whether or not to put a referendum on the ballot for all the voters to decide. But Lincoln calling for troops after Ft. Sumpter incensed people so much, they voted overwhelmingly (unanimously except for one delegate) to secede.
 
Upvote 0

Tallguy88

We shall see the King when he comes!
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2009
32,478
7,728
Parts Unknown
✟263,106.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
The above is why this discussion never goes anywhere. You have two sides that seem to feel being stubborn, and accusatory is the way to go in debating the subject.

I have absolutely no use for the flag myself. It can be seen as derogatory due to our countries history, and YES it can be seen as a sense of heritage that has nothing to do at all with racism. Yet, the new lines of war have been drawn because its the mature way of handing things. Sigh.

Today? Finding ways of dividing the country into more and more separate groups, and encourage fighting among those groups is suppose to be seen as the SANE way of doing business today.

I personally feel the whole thing is stupid, because all you hear is screaming...with no substance to help the circumstance at all. Gesh - acting like divas doesn't get anyone anywhere! Check history beyond bigotry and racism...and you will find that theme repeated constantly. Do human's not learn or what?!

I don't feel the confederate flag should be part of a state flag. That should be common sense, and should have drawed on people years ago. To me - its a respect thing. Deal with your heritage personally. You represent the entire state's population afterall. Yet, making manufacturing companies STOP making the flag...because we must DRAW them into the most current temper tantrum instead of negotiating is over the top too.

So, you have two sides that refuse to acknowledge the other's point of view. Yeah. That will solve things in a positive manner. So, when is this magic cure of behavior that can't debate going to erase the groups of PC people and racists?
All I'm for is for the people of the state to decide. If they decide to change it, that's fine by me. I just don't want the politicians to do it against the will of the people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zippy2
Upvote 0

Tallguy88

We shall see the King when he comes!
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2009
32,478
7,728
Parts Unknown
✟263,106.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
You cannot separate the Confederacy from its racist past. The problem with people waving around the Confederate flag is they deny it has any connection to racism, that is patently absurd. Trying to turn this into a "both sides are wrong" argument is ridiculous as you are constructing a false equivalence. It's not about one side simply wanting heritage, it's about claiming heritage while ignoring the hate. The Confederacy had slavery at its cornerstone, it was in all the state constitutions, it was the topic with the heaviest modification in the CSA Constitution. It was referenced in speeches by politicians, it was referenced in letters by Confederate troops. Following the dissolution of the Confederacy, former Confederate soldiers formed the KKK and began a decades long campaign of terrorism against African Americans. The Confederacy was heavily referenced in response to desegregation efforts. This is the history, these are the facts. When people turn around and claim the flag has no connection to racism or oppression, it is a lie. It is no different than someone saying the Nazi flag has no connection to the Holocaust.

This is not a "two sides" argument, saying otherwise is being intellectually dishonest and is nothing more than false equivalence.

How so? Southern heritage? How can they call it that when so many African Americans disagree? States' rights? But that's connected to institution of slavery. Simply to honor Southern soldiers? And what were they fighting for? The issue is not their pride, it's the denial and lying about history.

You're making things up now, nowhere in this thread or the linked stories is there an effort "make" companies stop manufacturing the flag. That is a complete lie.

I have a friend who had family that fought for the Confederacy, he has familial pride, but he doesn't deny what the Confederacy fought for.

The view that the Confederacy has nothing to do with racism is a lie, that is not political correctness. Denying history because it's inconvenient is dishonest and disrespectful to the many people hurt by those who used the flag as their standard bearer.
The First KKK lasted less than a decade and was dissolved by General Forrest after he saw how bad it had become. The Klan of the 20s, which is the Klan most people are familiar with, was a separate organization that formed and used the imagery of the First Klan. But it was not an organic continuation of the original Klan.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan
 
Upvote 0

Aryeh Jay

Replaced by a robot, just like Biden.
Site Supporter
Jul 19, 2012
17,646
16,283
MI - Michigan
✟670,851.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Judaism
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The First KKK lasted less than a decade and was dissolved by General Forrest after he saw how bad it had become. The Klan of the 20s, which is the Klan most people are familiar with, was a separate organization that formed and used the imagery of the First Klan. But it was not an organic continuation of the original Klan.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan
The first Klan, now was it just freed slaves or were there some anti-reconstruction and anti-carpetbagger in there somewhere too?
 
Upvote 0

Tallguy88

We shall see the King when he comes!
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2009
32,478
7,728
Parts Unknown
✟263,106.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
The first Klan, now was it just freed slaves or were there some anti-reconstruction and anti-carpetbagger in there somewhere too?
My understanding was that it primarily targeted Carpetbaggers (Republican Yankees who moved South) and the Blacks who allied with them. It got bad, so that is why Gen Forrest disbanded it.

The Second Klan was more targeted toward Catholics, Jews, and Blacks. Since it had a wider base of appeal than the first Klan, it grew to as many as 6 million members, in both the North and the South.

The modern Klan (sometimes called the Third Klan, though it's not a unified organization) has less than 10,000 members nationwide.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aryeh Jay
Upvote 0

SummerMadness

Senior Veteran
Mar 8, 2006
18,204
11,834
✟340,966.00
Faith
Catholic
My understanding was that it primarily targeted Carpetbaggers (Republican Yankees who moved South) and the Blacks who allied with them. It got bad, so that is why Gen Forrest disbanded it.

The Second Klan was more targeted toward Catholics, Jews, and Blacks. Since it had a wider base of appeal than the first Klan, it grew to as many as 6 million members, in both the North and the South.

The modern Klan (sometimes called the Third Klan, though it's not a unified organization) has less than 10,000 members nationwide.
That would be the revisionist history talking, the first Klan was disbanded because they were classified as a terrorist organization by the federal government and were soon prosecuted for their crimes. By the time they died out, they were a broken organization.
 
Upvote 0