Clare73
Blood-bought
- Jun 12, 2012
- 25,096
- 6,100
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Republican
Contraire. . .it is the heart of the matter.An automobile is a real thing, that it isn't mentioned in the Bible is a non-issue. Which is what Mark's point was in his post.
The word "Sacrament" refers to real things, and refers to real biblical things. So its absence from explicit biblical terminology is, like automobile or Trinity, a non-issue.
The word "automobile" like the word "sacrament" is not only not found in the Bible, neither meaning is found in the Bible, while the words "Trinity" and "sovereignty" also not being found in the Bible, their meaning is clearly presented there.
Man has no authority to add new concepts, such as "sacrament," to the Bible,
nor does man have authority to label such notion with the Biblical word "mystery,"
the meaning of which is not "incomprehensible," but rather "never before revealed," as in 1 Co 15:51, Eph 1:9, Eph 3:3-7, Col 1:26-27, etc.
I'd say it is less red herring than it is heresy.Trying to stick to the "automobile" example which Mark gave, rather than what his actual point was in using it, is simply a red herring.
Last edited:
Upvote
0
Is Mt 28:19 not clear? Is Dan 4:35 (plus many more) not clear?