dawiyd said:And every point of modern science and me disagrees with you and this angel, in a scientific debate you can't call in angels to back up your position.
Why not??? Science only covers the present.
Upvote
0
dawiyd said:And every point of modern science and me disagrees with you and this angel, in a scientific debate you can't call in angels to back up your position.
time said:Why not???
dawiyd said:And every point of modern science and me disagrees with you and this angel, in a scientific debate you can't call in angels to back up your position.
When did I ever say you did, you actually have no evidence science is wrong.maleparent said:i said that science is not evil but wrong.
I doubt if any Jewish scientist was proven wrong they still wouldn't recognize Jesus as l-rd. Any again i'm asking you to show science is wrong instead of casting out baseless assertions.i belive that it will realise its mistake and that all scientists will come together to rejoice under the banner of our lord JESUS CHRIST.
Typical creationist rhetoric, actually provided some sources and stop spreading propaganda.I read about a mass conversion in a lab once. They got some results that they didn't know how to explain. one of the scientists was a christian though and did know how to explain it. He got out his BIBLE and preached for a while and everyone in the lab came to realise JESUS IS LORD.
Well I do pray, infact I pray three times a day and on the Sabbath four times a day.Sceince will come around. I pray that you will to.
time said:Why not??? Science only covers the present.
No problem, because it does not matter what was here before. Instead of calling it the GAP they should call it the DSM for Does Not Matter. It simply does not matter what happened or what you think may have happened before the Garden of Eden.madarab said:JohnR7 is going to have problems with that because the actual scientific evidence pretty clearly shows that snakes are over 100 million years old, rather than the 6000 years that his myth requires.
JohnR7 said:No problem, because it does not matter what was here before. Instead of calling it the GAP they should call it the DSM for Does Not Matter. It simply does not matter what happened or what you think may have happened before the Garden of Eden.
The challange is always the same. Prove that there was no one named Adam or Eve that lived in the cradle of civilization 6,000 years ago. Prove that there was no snake and prove that there was no garden. You can not falsify any of it. Esp. talking snakes, becaues I know to many people that think they talk to their dog and there is another story in the Bible about a talking donkey.
Then we should have no problem proving it eh?JohnR7 said:No one can falsify the Bible and a lot of the Bible has already been proven to be true.
They have been using archeology for the last 200 years to prove the Bible is true. Now we are getting more and more DNA evidence to show that the Bible is true. Then we have the study of langage that shows the Bible is true. So there is three witness there that are all the tools of science.dawiyd said:Then we should have no problem proving it eh?
JohnR7 said:They have been using archeology for the last 200 years to prove the Bible is true. Now we are getting more and more DNA evidence to show that the Bible is true. Then we have the study of langage that shows the Bible is true. So there is three witness there that are all the tools of science.
Archeology, DNA and linguistics show the Bible to be true.
Neither DNA nor linguistics show the Bible to be true. Linguistics, in particular, demonstrates that the biblical tale of Babel is false.JohnR7 said:They have been using archeology for the last 200 years to prove the Bible is true. Now we are getting more and more DNA evidence to show that the Bible is true. Then we have the study of langage that shows the Bible is true. So there is three witness there that are all the tools of science.
Archeology, DNA and linguistics show the Bible to be true.
Poe's law strikes again!dawiyd said:And every point of modern science and me disagrees with you and this angel, in a scientific debate you can't call in angels to back up your position.
But the key factor there, is that it won't agree with the bible, where the angel does. If the angel did not, it would be wrong.dawiyd said:Because I can do exactly the same thing, without any backing or evidence that such an event occurred, or you can't actually be sure that it was an angle, for all you know it may be the "devil" appearing to you in disguise.
Our facts are in the present, all else is not covered at all, save by inference.dawiyd said:No science covers facts.
I do not buy into the lies if that is what you mean. I have not been indoctrinated to follow the party line. I do not follow their programing. That does not mean I do not know anything about it. I know more about it than 95% of the people out there. Of course that is not saying very much.dawiyd said:you have very little knowledge about DNA,
Yes, it does mean you do not know anything about it. You constantly demonstrate this.JohnR7 said:I do not buy into the lies if that is what you mean. I have not been indoctrinated to follow the party line. I do not follow their programing. That does not mean I do not know anything about it. I know more about it than 95% of the people out there. Of course that is not saying very much.
So are you suggesting that everyone in the world today still speaks the same language?Electric Skeptic said:Linguistics, in particular, demonstrates that the biblical tale of Babel is false.
Since I nowhere suggested that...no.JohnR7 said:So are you suggesting that everyone in the world today still speaks the same language?
All of the rest is just rant. Linguistics proves that the biblical tale of Babel is false; it does not in any way support the bible.JohnR7 said:Do you have any history book at all that you can show is more accurate than the Bible is?
Josephus had a very nice life. Why? Because people wanted to have a good place in his history book. If he told the truth about people, they would have killed him.
Actually, they did kill Paul and Jesus and a few of the others, for telling the truth. Now after they gave their life for the truth, you want to call them a liar.