• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Creationists are told the flood is true and actually happened,

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,188
52,656
Guam
✟5,149,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Please show a peer-reviewed paper...

Please show a peer-reviewed paper...

Please show a peer-reviewed paper...
All a 'peer-reviewed paper' is, is a document declaring the winner of a knock-down, drag-out, convocation of whitecoats.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,143
Visit site
✟98,025.00
Faith
Agnostic
I give you clues, you go and search by keywords. I am not teaching kindergarten kids.

All serious literatures are very specified. If you really like to see a research article, be specific on what you want to see.

Only a kindergartner would be so coy. It's like asking a child what happened to the ice cream. All we get is stories.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,188
52,656
Guam
✟5,149,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That's a sad (and erroneous) view of the scientific process.
I believe peer-reviewing is just one segment of the 'scientific process'?

If I wanted to give a sad view of the 'scientific process', I'd QV this (for about the 10th time): 74 .
 
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
39
London
✟37,512.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I believe peer-reviewing is just one segment of the 'scientific process'?

If I wanted to give a sad view of the 'scientific process', I'd QV this (for about the 10th time): 74 .

And it's wrong. For at least the 10th time.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,188
52,656
Guam
✟5,149,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
That is a sad (and erroneous) view of a segment of the scientific process.

feel better now? doesn't make it any less sad.
You ever been to one?
 
Upvote 0

Wedjat

Spirited Apostate
Aug 8, 2009
2,673
145
Home sweet home
✟26,307.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
You do realize it's not an event.

"Hey Dr. Todd, you coming to the peer review cookout tomorrow?"
"Should I bring drinks?"
"What kind of question is that? Of course you should bring drinks. Oh and don't forget your bathing suit, Dr. Brink has a pool."
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,188
52,656
Guam
✟5,149,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
lol. av has tragically shot himself in the face, again.
Funny you should say that.

I was about to post this: 123.

Notice the avatar?

[Note: And yes, Thaumaturgy denies it.]
 
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
39
London
✟37,512.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
39
London
✟37,512.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
If it is, it's funny-looking fire.

It's fire.

And for the record, I'm not enjoying this conversation, guys.

Given the number of times you pulled a where-you-there? on us and yet are quite willing to spew innuendo about peer review, a process you've never taken part in, and what other posters have said about it, neither are many people here I expect - to say nothing of all the other times you derail threads.
 
Upvote 0

gaara4158

Gen Alpha Dad
Aug 18, 2007
6,441
2,688
United States
✟216,414.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Funny you should say that.

I was about to post this: 123.

Notice the avatar?

[Note: And yes, Thaumaturgy denies it.]

So if an alternative to the facts is even dreamed of and put somewhere on the internet, AV automatically gets a clever hunch that it's true. If it's denied, that's just evidence of the massive cover-up you suspect is going on. [incredulous scolding goes here]
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,188
52,656
Guam
✟5,149,957.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
So if an alternative to the facts is even dreamed of and put somewhere on the internet, AV automatically gets a clever hunch that it's true. If it's denied, that's just evidence of the massive cover-up you suspect is going on. [incredulous scolding goes here]
Well, I'm leaving this thread anyways, and I just might walk out on Physical & Life Sciences and Creation & Evolution for awhile, as well.
 
Upvote 0

Cabal

Well-Known Member
Jul 22, 2007
11,592
476
39
London
✟37,512.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Engaged
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Well, I'm leaving this thread anyways, and I just might walk out on Physical & Life Sciences and Creation & Evolution for awhile, as well.

Does this mean we're about to see the first instance of "/board"?
 
Upvote 0