Creationists are told the flood is true and actually happened,

[gaara4158]

Most ironic thing is that is a thread on the Fibonacci Sequence numbers.... And he doesn't get it, he's just counting "310, 311, 312, 313, 314"

So he even derails number threads with his ignorance. Amazing!

 

[laconicstudent]

Do you have a problem with me, "brother"? I happen to be going back and resurrecting old numbering threads and running them up to 1000 posts, so admin can lock them ... since they have a 1000-post limit per thread now. Old threads from 2008 - 2003 with 15 posts in them (or less --- some have zero), 300 posts in them, even 950 posts --- whatever --- I'm running up to 1000. And it keeps me from having to start a new thread on my own every time I hit 1000 posts. If you'd like to help, instead of sit on the sidelines in a high-chair and psychoanalyze me like others do, you can go to the numbering threads, go to page 125, and grab anything with less than 1000 posts in it (that isn't locked), and have a ball. Don't worry --- you won't be questioned about your faith by those who think they know more than you do about it. You might have an atheist come along every once in awhile and attach tags to it, thinking he's being cute, but other than that, it's a ball.

Its not that, its just that we're flabbergasted as to why you'd care. Why do those threads need to be locked? Just let them slide off the front page and die.

 

[Jazmyn]

that is so your favourite smiley

 

[Thistlethorn]

that is so your favourite smiley

This is my favorite smiley:

 

[laconicstudent]

This is my favorite smiley:

Interesting little critter. Do you know the genus and species, by chance?

 

[Thistlethorn]

Interesting little critter. Do you know the genus and species, by chance?

Theridion grallator.

 

[laconicstudent]

Theridion grallator.

Fascinating, thanks.

 

[juvenissun]

So, Wiccan_Child, I say the ocean water on the earth is the best evidence of the Global Flood. What you say?

 

[Wiccan_Child]

So, Wiccan_Child, I say the ocean water on the earth is the best evidence of the Global Flood. What you say?

I say there is not nearly enough water to cover the Earth's surface, as we can clearly see.

 

[juvenissun]

I say there is not nearly enough water to cover the Earth's surface, as we can clearly see.

I say: you are completely correct. So, the Global Flood will not happen again.

 

[laconicstudent]

I say: you are completely correct. So, the Global Flood will not happen again.

And, by the same proof, never did happen.

 

[Wiccan_Child]

I say: you are completely correct. So, the Global Flood will not happen again.

Jolly good. But how do the oceans constitute evidence of a Global Flood? The water's all here, and it doesn't cover the Earth's surface.

 

[gipsy]

I say there is not nearly enough water to cover the Earth's surface, as we can clearly see.

If we disregard all tectonics and geology I think there should be enough water to cover all Earth's surface ... you just have to level the complete earth surface

 

[Wiccan_Child]

If we disregard all tectonics and geology I think there should be enough water to cover all Earth's surface ... you just have to level the complete earth surface

True, but, since we're talking about evidence, I can easily back up the claim that the Earth was never flat enough be globally flooded. Indeed, the Bible is quite clear that the water that covered the Earth came from a) rain, and b) the waters of the deep.

So, yeah .

 

[laconicstudent]

I'm rather curious as to how he'll twist the fact that there isn't enough water for a global flood into evidence that there was a global flood. Its not often that you get to see the truth undergo such contortions

 

[juvenissun]

Jolly good. But how do the oceans constitute evidence of a Global Flood? The water's all here, and it doesn't cover the Earth's surface.

You physicist is not used to think that the world before now is a different one. But in geology, it is a common sense.

The water in the ocean can easily flood the whole earth when the continents were thinner than they are now.

 

[juvenissun]

I'm rather curious as to how he'll twist the fact that there isn't enough water for a global flood into evidence that there was a global flood. Its not often that you get to see the truth undergo such contortions

Be humble. A lot of things that you do not know. Nobody is twisting anything.

 

[laconicstudent]

You physicist is not used to think that the world before now is a different one. But in geology, it is a common sense.

The water in the ocean can easily flood the whole earth when the continents were thinner than they are now.

And you of course have proof (peer-reviewed) that this actually was the case?

 

[juvenissun]

If we disregard all tectonics and geology I think there should be enough water to cover all Earth's surface ... you just have to level the complete earth surface

The thought is on the right track. But tectonics is a critical part of the whole thing. When the earth was very flat, there was not enough water either.

 

[juvenissun]

True, but, since we're talking about evidence, I can easily back up the claim that the Earth was never flat enough be globally flooded. Indeed, the Bible is quite clear that the water that covered the Earth came from a) rain, and b) the waters of the deep.

So, yeah .

Pay attention to what I said. It is not so much about how flat the earth was, but is about how thin the continents were.