Creationism and evolution.

[Goonie]

See, here is the attack again.
So what? Do you mean we CAN NOT teach our kids about science with the information about Creationism? Who are you to say that?

Creationism is not a science. I would not expect a maths teacher to teach english lit to his maths class, nor a music teacher to teach his class the history of the french revolution, so why are you asking for science teachers to teach religion?

 

[juvenissun]

Just demonstrate it is scientific and toss it in with science class.

Too much to ask?

Still an attack.

 

[bhsmte]

Still an attack.

Attack? Asking you to demonstrate creationism is science?

 

[juvenissun]

Creationism is not a science. I would not expect a maths teacher to teach english lit to his maths class, nor a music teacher to teach his class the history of the french revolution, so why are you asking for science teachers to teach religion?

It is closely related to science.
This would be off the topic, but if you name one piece of info of Creationism (ANY one), I will argue strongly that it is VERY IMPORTANT to science.

 

[juvenissun]

Attack? Asking you to demonstrate creationism is science?

Yes. It is used to BAN Creationism. The motivation can not be more clear.

 

[bhsmte]

Yes. It is used to BAN Creationism. The motivation can not be more clear.

Does this mean you can not demonstrate that creationism is science?

 

[bhsmte]

Yes. It is used to BAN Creationism. The motivation can not be more clear.

Since when is creationism banned?

You are allowed to believe in creationism, correct?
You are allowed to teach your kids creationism, correct?
You church is allowed to teach creationism, correct?
No one stops Kenny Ham from preaching creationism, correct?

So, show me how creationism is banned.

 

[Goonie]

It is closely related to science.
This would be off the topic, but if you name one piece of info of Creationism (ANY one), I will argue strongly that it is VERY IMPORTANT to science.

As has been asked, please demonstrate that creationism is a science.

 

[juvenissun]

As has been asked, please demonstrate that creationism is a science.

I did not say it IS science. I said it is VERY IMPORTANT to science.

 

[bhsmte]

I did not say it IS science. I said it is VERY IMPORTANT to science.

Why is something that isn't science, important to science? Please demonstrate, why it is important to science.

 

[Goonie]

I did not say it IS science. I said it is VERY IMPORTANT to science.

Please explain, important to science?

 

[juvenissun]

Why is something that isn't science, important to science? Please demonstrate, why it is important to science.

No demonstration. If you have question, then ask.

 

[juvenissun]

Please explain, important to science?

Important to science means: it asks, or raises critical question to science.

 

[Goonie]

Important to science means: it asks, or raises critical question to science.

Please elaborate.

 

[bhsmte]

No demonstration. If you have question, then ask.

I asked the question.

 

[bhsmte]

Important to science means: it asks, or raises critical question to science.

Examples?

 

[juvenissun]

Please elaborate.

What to elaborate?

 

[juvenissun]

I asked the question.

What was it?

 

[juvenissun]

Examples?

Origin of Pluto?

 

[justlookinla]

Why can creationists say any derogatory thing they like about evolution but no one is allowed to say anything derogatory about creationism?
Why does creationism require so much protection but evolution require none?
Surely if something is true it will still be true no matter what anyone says about it, evolution is the prime example of that.

If Darwinism were true, there'd be no neo-Darwinism or neo-neo-Darwinism. Keep adding the 'neos' to the previous errors of science.