Ah, so what you are actually advocating is that the statement should be "it may, or may not, have been kicked off by a non-specific creative being"?
I don't see what value there is in that response. Could you explain?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Ah, so what you are actually advocating is that the statement should be "it may, or may not, have been kicked off by a non-specific creative being"?They are all gods to someone. So in stating God the student can adapt the reference to their own God or belief.
Fine to see that you provide yourself an example that refutes post n° 41 of yours.And they should be allowed to express their interest at work too. I worked in a hospital for a time and there were a few doctors that nealed in the corner of the room daily during their shift to pray no problem there.
The answer is in the fact that God should be included in all aspects of the education system if the world is to come to terms with the fundamental reality of creation and a God that can humble and contain the family unit.Do you have actual answer, or just a dance move?
If we speak of a science teacher teaching in a science class, then the above would be highly inappropriate as explained in this essay.Note I said mention what would be wrong with a science teacher starting of his/her class by saying OK kids let me teach you all about the solar system another one of God's creations.
In that case you will have to provide empirical evidence for god's existence. And that evidence will be inspected with the same rigor as let us say the theory of relativity or quantum mechanics. Do you think you want to go down that road?The answer is in the fact that God should be included in all aspects of the education system if the world is to come to terms with the fundamental reality of creation and a God that can humble and contain the family unit.
Got it. You want to ignore all other possibilities and impose your own, unevidenced belief. Why do you guys find it so hard to be honest about your reasoning? Why the continual dancing and pretence of balanced views when we all know that's a complete crock?The answer is in the fact that God should be included in all aspects of the education system if the world is to come to terms with the fundamental reality of creation and a God that can humble and contain the family unit.
Covalent bonds are very important. Every class, every working day should start with a review of covalent bonds, from kindergarten to retirement day.If it's a religious studies class I don't see a problem with it, but why would God need to be brought up in a science class? Isn't that starting off an art class with a discussion of how to warm up for exercises? or starting a woodworking class with a discussion about covalent bonds in atoms? It simply isn't relevant for the subject.
Yes, culture plays a big part in religion so we must respect the beliefs of all. There God may well be my God just by another name.I don't see what value there is in that response. Could you explain?
Hang on, you just said we need to ignore all other creative beings and push God. Now you say we don't push God, but acknowledge the possibility of other creative beings or no creative being at all.Yes, culture plays a big part in religion so we must respect the beliefs of all. There God may well be my God just by another name.
No, you just don't get it the fact that some arias of society are accepting of one's religion and others shy away like schools. Yes, we all start praying at the hospital bedside we all call out to God at a time of great need but don't bring it to work or school you may be ridiculed.Fine to see that you provide yourself an example that refutes post n° 41 of yours.
I wouldn't hang up my bible based on that nonsense.then the above would be highly inappropriate as explained in this essay.
I can't see where I stated that.you just said we need to ignore all other creative beings and push God.
I think you have misinterpreted one of my statements just like you would misinterpret the bible if you tried to read it.Please, just pick one argument and stick to it.
Be clear - are you advocating "it may have been kicked off by God" (capital G, with all the baggage that name comes with) because we need "to come to terms with the fundamental reality of creation and a God that can humble and contain the family unit." Or are you advocating "it may, or may not, have been kicked off by a non-specific creative being" allowing students to decide for themselves?I think you have misinterpreted one of my statements just like you would misinterpret the bible if you tried to read it.
1) Nobody asks you to hang up your bible.I wouldn't hang up my bible based on that nonsense.
I have always stated that God created all things as I am a Christian and I am a believer in the bible in a literal sense.Or are you advocating "it may, or may not, have been kicked off by a non-specific creative being" allowing students to decide for themselves?
You didn't answer my question. Please stop the dancing and avoidance.I have always stated that God created all things as I am a Christian and I am a believer in the bible in a literal sense.
If any creationist has misled or deviated from the truth then that shows how nobody is perfect. you see we are all born as evolutionists but we must learn to be believers in God and once we find God there is no turning back just like the truth can not be made into a lie. God had his words transcripted to paper so we can learn as he knew we would otherwise remain as the dirt. So I am very sorry that you have a story to tell that is contrary to the truth but there are bad apples on every apple tree.I wrote an essay, documented with examples of creationist's behaviour.
My apologies Yes at the end of the day every person must make up their own mind but they must first hear both sides of all things first. My belief can be believed or dismissed it's called free will.You didn't answer my question. Please stop the dancing and avoidance.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?