• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Creation vs Evolution

Status
Not open for further replies.

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married

I said that a teacher should not, in the course of teaching students, include things that are not part of the curriculum, and you immediately go to, "Well, I guess they should replace all the teachers with robots so that doesn't happen." Seems like an overreaction to me.

I have no problem with a teacher engaging in friendly conversation with students. I have no problem with a teacher being a Christian, and I have no problem with a teacher being open about his religion with his students. I just have a problem with a teacher's religion influencing the way they teach the subject they were hired to teach, and I have a problem with a science teacher basing any part of their lesson on their religious faith.

Replacing the teachers with robots is not the most rational solution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

SelfSim

A non "-ist"
Jun 23, 2014
7,045
2,232
✟210,136.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
And if I was the teacher of that class I would refer the student to a biblical class as they don't have to believe or already know about everything. eg: The roses smell lovely this morning class today's lesson is all about botany. Which tex book is that in sir.
That would have been the end of that teacher in the high school I attended, (ie: if it was a male teacher). I mean smellin' lovely roses?? What sorta bloke does that nonsense?
Unlikely he would have survived the ensuing harassment for another year or so.
 
Upvote 0

Walk together

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2021
469
221
sydney
✟37,737.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Labor
I have a problem with a science teacher basing any part of their lesson on their religious faith.
I disagree eg: In a class of Astro physics if a student asked the teacher how did the universe begin would it be wrong for the teacher to say it all started with a singularity that may or may not be kicked off by God. As we all know the big bang has quite a bit of conjecture about it and can never be proven yet some teachers like to make a solid case for the big ban theory. I say let's include God in all topics until proven false not wait till proven true. After all, there are many lines of science that are discussed in a class that are not fully understood.
 
Upvote 0

Walk together

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2021
469
221
sydney
✟37,737.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Labor
That would have been the end of that teacher in the high school I attended
Some children need to learn a bit about humility they all cry like babies at the end of the day. A good man can smell the roses one minute and have good disciplinary skills the next.
 
Upvote 0

SelfSim

A non "-ist"
Jun 23, 2014
7,045
2,232
✟210,136.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Some children need to learn a bit about humility they all cry like babies at the end of the day. A good man can smell the roses one minute and have good disciplinary skills the next.
Ahh .. the need to physically dominate kids, eh?
Very weak .. (but considered as being a badge of honour at my old school).
Not allowed nowadays tho.
 
Upvote 0

Walk together

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2021
469
221
sydney
✟37,737.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Labor
the need to physically dominate
Disciplinary action doesn't need to be physical. Most kids that come to school with an attitude are usually suffering from abuse at home so we can blame mum or dad assuming the child has two parents.
 
Upvote 0

SelfSim

A non "-ist"
Jun 23, 2014
7,045
2,232
✟210,136.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
.. Most kids that come to school with an attitude are usually suffering from abuse at home so we can blame mum or dad assuming the child has two parents.
Just what kind of 'attitude' are you talking about? A kid who asks for proof, or a textbook reference, has a punishable 'attitude' which can be blamed on parental abuse in your book, eh? With zero evidence, or an investigation?

Here we see the end result of religious beliefs.

All I see is a kid with an inquiring mind.
 
Upvote 0

Bungle_Bear

Whoot!
Mar 6, 2011
9,084
3,513
✟262,040.00
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
I disagree eg: In a class of Astro physics if a student asked the teacher how did the universe begin would it be wrong for the teacher to say it all started with a singularity that may or may not be kicked off by God. As we all know the big bang has quite a bit of conjecture about it and can never be proven yet some teachers like to make a solid case for the big ban theory. I say let's include God in all topics until proven false not wait till proven true. After all, there are many lines of science that are discussed in a class that are not fully understood.
If we say "it may have been kicked off by God", shouldn't we also acknowledge that it may have been kicked off by Allah/Brahma/Black God/Ymir/<insert-every-other-creative-being-here>? If not, why not? What is wrong with keeping things simple and just saying "the universe started, we don't know why" and be done with it? It sure would save a lot of time.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I disagree eg: In a class of Astro physics if a student asked the teacher how did the universe begin would it be wrong for the teacher to say it all started with a singularity that may or may not be kicked off by God. As we all know the big bang has quite a bit of conjecture about it and can never be proven yet some teachers like to make a solid case for the big ban theory. I say let's include God in all topics until proven false not wait till proven true. After all, there are many lines of science that are discussed in a class that are not fully understood.

The problem is that the concept of God is unfalsifiable and thus has no place in a science class.

If your child came home and said their science teacher told them that the universe was created from the body of the giant Ymir, would you be accepting of that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

Kylie

Defeater of Illogic
Nov 23, 2013
15,069
5,309
✟327,545.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
If we say "it may have been kicked off by God", shouldn't we also acknowledge that it may have been kicked off by Allah/Brahma/Black God/Ymir/<insert-every-other-creative-being-here>? If not, why not? What is wrong with keeping things simple and just saying "the universe started, we don't know why" and be done with it? It sure would save a lot of time.

So cool that we both brought up Ymir completely independently.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Astrophile
Upvote 0

Walk together

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2021
469
221
sydney
✟37,737.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Labor
Just what kind of 'attitude' are you talking about?
I was responding to the teacher that was finished by the class that seems to think that smelling roses is out of order. This type of attitude is immature and requires some disciplinary action in the way of learning about having humility. Children go to school to learn how to become understanding and loving adults one day.
 
Upvote 0

Walk together

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2021
469
221
sydney
✟37,737.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Labor
If we say "it may have been kicked off by God", shouldn't we also acknowledge that it may have been kicked off by Allah/Brahma/Black God/Ymir/<insert-every-other-creative-being-here>? If not, why not? What is wrong with keeping things simple and just saying "the universe started, we don't know why" and be done with it? It sure would save a lot of time.
I think you are turning a simple statement into a complex issue and that is the reason in the first place for God being kicked out of the education system.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,855,605
52,510
Guam
✟5,128,168.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Note I said mention what would be wrong with a science teacher starting of his/her class by saying OK kids let me teach you all about the solar system another one of God's creations.
Indeed.

I once said this:

Every science student should be required to memorize this verse:

Ecclesiastes 3:11 He hath made every thing beautiful in his time: also he hath set the world in their heart, so that no man can find out the work that God maketh from the beginning to the end.

As well as:

Proverbs 25:2 It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.

Post 216
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Walk together
Upvote 0

Walk together

Well-Known Member
Jun 25, 2021
469
221
sydney
✟37,737.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
AU-Labor
If we say "it may have been kicked off by God", shouldn't we also acknowledge that it may have been kicked off by Allah/Brahma/Black God/Ymir/<insert-every-other-creative-being-here>? If not, why not? What is wrong with keeping things simple and just saying "the universe started, we don't know why" and be done with it? It sure would save a lot of time.
They are all gods to someone. So in stating God the student can adapt the reference to their own God or belief.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.