[QUOTE="Bible Research Tools, post: 72793972, member: 409605" I don't recall claiming anyone is or is not a Christian. But I am pretty certain creation scientists take the brunt of attacks on their faith by evolutionists on this board, and not vice versa.
Creationist pseudoscience practioners ( I’m not calling them scientists) deserved the so called attacks as they are dead wrong to lie the way they do
I will agree that evolutionists lie.
"I [Phillip E. Johnson] had the honor to be the subject of a program at the American Association for the Advancement of Science annual meeting in Boston in February of 1993. Michael Ruse gave a lecture on me which was intended to be, from its abstract, an exercise in what we might call Johnson bashing.
Well deserved too as Johnson is a lawyer and has demonstrated repeatedly that he doesn’t understand science
Phillip Johnson knows more about science than you will ever know. He certainly understands the pseudoscience of evolution is not science.
Where is the conspiracy? It is a fact that evolutionists have a cronyistic relationship with government that prevents other theories from being recognized or funded. Are you denying that?
Yes!
Where do you live, Mongolia? The pseudoscience of evolutionism is the only religion allowed to be taught in public schools; and it is enforced by the power of the sword -- the government sword -- and it is funded out of the public treasuries.
Ignorance is bliss, I have heard. Only accurate thing you’ve ever stated.
You are welcome to point out any inaccuracies in my statements -- I encourage it! But please refrain from presenting evolutionism dogma as fact.
Dr. Wise presents the argument that fossilization occurs ONLY in anaerobic environments; so I am not sure what your point is. Baloney on the "eolian" fossils.
aeolian deposits are formed by wind like sand dunes. baloney on your pseudoscience based ignorance
Like I said, ignorance is bliss. There is no evidence any sand formation in the pre-modern geological column was formed by wind-blown sand. To the contrary, everything points to a watery environment: the angle of the cross-bedding; the preservation of the footprints; everything.
Either that or they lived in higher altitudes than, say, the dinos, and were covered by subsequent flood sediments.
yep, pines run faster than ferns
The plant fossil record points to marine-to-terrestrial flood depositions, exactly as predicted by a global flood.
That actually begins at the 29:09 mark. Stasis in the fossil record is obvious. Kurt Wise was a student of the late Dr. Stephen Jay Gould, Harvard, who coined the term; so I feel certain Dr. Wise understands it better than most.
Wise deliberately ignores evidence and real scientists don’t. Punk eek is due to rapid speciation followed by relative stasis . If you want to see this in real life- Timema cristinae evolving to eat another plant species . These timemids are background mimics.
LOL! I see you moved the goalposts. You evolutionists are too much!
Rapid speciation is unobservable nonsense; but it was the only way to rescue Darwin's imaginary gradualism from the dustbin of history, where it and rapid speciation truly belong.
How do you explain coal seams with flat tops and bottoms? How do you explain the presence of short mud layers (benches) between the seams?
Are you serious!?!?! Unbelievable!!!!!
I knew you could not explain them. Coal formations expose the foolishness of uniformitarianism, so it is best if you pretend they do not exist.
For the record, Dr. Steven Austin received his PhD from Penn State by defending his dissertation on coal formation based on a theory similar to the floating forest theory.
Austin is either an incompetent or a liar. Take your pick.
The academic community at Penn State, who accepted Austin's PhD defense, will be pleased to hear you have determined them to be incompetent. Of course, all they have to do is read a couple of your posts to realize you don't have a clue about this subject.
Carbon 14 dating of coal, alone, confirms the "300 million of years ago" date by evolutionist is silly. Additionally, the fact that coal seams are typically flat rules out any notion of a swamp origin.
C14 dating is only good for 50,000 years . I find it odd that you don’t know that . No layer over 50,000 years is able to be dated by C14. You’d rather keep repeating pseudoscience nonsense, though, wouldn’t you?
I have a reasonable grasp of the subject matter. I studied it in at least one of my Nuclear Engineering courses.
For the record, those C14 dates for coal samples were measured in secular labs. So were the K-Ar dates of 0.35 to 2.8 million years for the newly-formed rocks of Mount St. Helens.
Dan
