Coccyx - tale of a creationist disinformation post

[dad]

I'm sorry - did you present evidence on how the genome looked right after creation? I missed it.

Neither did you. Yet who claims it is known!?

Odd - nothing that you omitted in your pathetic response even mentioned ERVs.

The issue seems to be how the 'viri' got around/transferred in the former times. Not how it now gets around. If you want to mention it in relation to earth's far past, then you need to show the nature then was as now.

The things we know about reality and nature contradict your sad devotion to ancient numerologist tales. You then concoct some dopey baseless fabrication about how things musta' been different in olden times.

Nothing is known about nature in the far past here actually. Only your religion and belief set regarding the belief that all things were as now contradicts the record we have of the time.

Kids...disbelieve your teachers on all origins claims!

 

[Skreeper]

Neither did you. Yet who claims it is known!?

The issue seems to be how the 'viri' got around/transferred in the former times. Not how it now gets around. If you want to mention it in relation to earth's far past, then you need to show the nature then was as now.


Nothing is known about nature in the far past here actually. Only your religion and belief set regarding the belief that all things were as now contradicts the record we have of the time.

Kids...disbelieve your teachers on all origins claims!

Are you still ranting about your imaginary different state past? I thought there is medication for this type of affliction...

 

[dad]

Are you still ranting about your imaginary different state past? I thought there is medication for this type of affliction...

No. I was looking at your imaginary state past. The one you use to fabricate godless models with. The one you dare not defend.

 

[Skreeper]

No. I was looking at your imaginary state past. The one you use to fabricate godless models with. The one you dare not defend.

Reality does not need defending. Especially not from crazy ideas like yours.

 

[dad]

Reality does not need defending. Especially not from crazy ideas like yours.

Nor does reality need speaking about by folks like y'all. Thought you had a monopoly on the word eh? Sorry, no.

 

[tas8831]

Let's look at your words in the OP and spot the errors then.

So your silly diversion was just your desperate way of admitting that you lack the requisite knowledge to tell when a creationist is talking out of you-know-where.

Got it.

What was ignored:

The creationist in question claimed about the coccyx:

...because the coccyx is known to be there to support a ganglia of nervous tissue covered in grey matter (like a little brain - coccygeal plexus) and not only is the connective source of the two coccygeal and also sciatic nerves, but assists (and is necessary to) the autonomic urogenital functions. In its parasympathetic stimulated phase it is essential to our sexuality, thus mating, thus perpetuation and survival of the species. It carries the sensation/information through the axons to the central nervous system and back through transmission across the dentrites.​

I spotted 7 errors in that one paragraph alone - only 1 of which is a spelling error.
Can you spot them? If not, then how can you tell when creationists spin yarns about the coccyx to claim it is not vestigial?
Discuss.​

Back on ignore you go.

 

[dad]

So your silly diversion was just your desperate way of admitting that you lack the requisite knowledge to tell when a creationist is talking out of you-know-where.

Got it.

What was ignored:

The creationist in question claimed about the coccyx:

...because the coccyx is known to be there to support a ganglia of nervous tissue covered in grey matter (like a little brain - coccygeal plexus) and not only is the connective source of the two coccygeal and also sciatic nerves, but assists (and is necessary to) the autonomic urogenital functions. In its parasympathetic stimulated phase it is essential to our sexuality, thus mating, thus perpetuation and survival of the species. It carries the sensation/information through the axons to the central nervous system and back through transmission across the dentrites.​

I spotted 7 errors in that one paragraph alone - only 1 of which is a spelling error.
Can you spot them? If not, then how can you tell when creationists spin yarns about the coccyx to claim it is not vestigial?
Discuss.​

Back on ignore you go.

And I spotted errors in your reply to it in the OP which I listed. Why would I consider one side that erred was better than the other side? Ignore it all you like.

 

[tas8831]

And I spotted errors in your reply to it in the OP which I listed. Why would I consider one side that erred was better than the other side? Ignore it all you like.

LOL!

Such hubris.

You could just admit that this thread was way over your head. I thought pride was a sin of some kind?

Bye bye. Not worth the effort - anyone else reading this sees you for what you are, no skin of my back.

 

[tas8831]

The issue seems to be how the 'viri' got around/transferred in the former times. Not how it now gets around. If you want to mention it in relation to earth's far past, then you need to show the nature then was as now.

I did not even mention ERVs - the dishonesty and ignorance runs DEEP in creationdom!

Kids...disbelieve your teachers on all origins claims!

Kids and anyone with intelligence - disbelieve anything said by people in church regarding origins!

 

[dad]

LOL!

Such hubris.

You could just admit that this thread was way over your head. I thought pride was a sin of some kind?

It is...so admit you made errors. I listed them. As for your misconceptions and beliefs being over my head...get a grip.

By the way, why keep replying when you claim you put me on ignore?? Be honest.

As you go I remind you...you were defeated.

 

[dad]

I did not even mention ERVs - the dishonesty and ignorance runs DEEP in creationdom!

Looking back I see you didn't. Lots of people do in relation to genetics and trying to claim man shares ancestors with animals.

So, take the first part of my response then.

" None of this addresses what genetics/DNA was like in the early days of creation. Looking at how ERVs get around now or are located is off topic to how they used to get around to locations! Not unless you have some evidence that the nature was the same, and you don't.

Yes, today we have a world and state or nature that does have things work a certain way, and if this nature always existed, you might have a point. You don't though. You simply desperately appeal to the present state and way things now work, and try to superimpose that for all time that earth existed."

You claimed we shared ancestors no? Deal with it..the basis for that claim is belief. (when we are talking about the far past)

Kids and anyone with intelligence - disbelieve anything said by people in church regarding origins!

Since most of them agree with science...sure. They may do well to exercise great caution there also. But I never said I went to any church, so you are guilty of what you claimed I was in the first part of the post!

 

[tas8831]

And he never did...

So, you were unable to address the coccyx in any way, and true to form, have dove into the gutter claiming Darwin was a racist. Classic!

Here is a passage from Henry Morris, PhD, YEC, minister:

"Often the Hamites, especially the Negroes, have become actual personal servants or even slaves to the others. Possessed of a genetic character concerned mainly with mundane matters, they have eventually been displaced by the intellectual and philosophical acumen of the Japhethites" -- Henry M. Morris, 1991

Now that we have established that creationism supports racism, please address the issue of creationists engaging in obfuscation, ignorance, and dishonesty re: the coccyx?

Apologies for the thread resurrection, but even a 3 year old thread is better than the latest version of "Can Darwinism turn a gnat into a camel if it tries hard enough?"...
On a positive note, the retired engineer YEC with all the answers and his own website "BibleResearchTools" never posted here again...