Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
And since the trinity view involves Jesus being God the Father, then it means that God lived on this Earth, just like man.
I missed that one. Thanks.Trinitarians have NEVER taught that the Father is the Son.
Thread is open.This thread would be reopened tomorrow morning Eastern Time.
Thank you.
Yes you guys do... Did you not just say that Christains believe that God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost are ONE in substance and essence?Trinitarians have NEVER taught that the Father is the Son.
Yes you guys do... Did you not just say that Christains believe that God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost are ONE in substance and essence?
That is the paradox of The Trinity understanding by modern Christians, and the reason Christian Theologians have given up trying to rectify the contradiction by declaring it a mystery.
Because if true, that means that if God the Son has an eternally incarnate body of flesh and bones... Then the Father "being ONE" in essence and substance must also possess the same Body of Flesh and Bones.
Just because you'll never admit that, does not solve your contradiction.
I gave the quote of your leader where he plainly states God Himself, prior to incarnation was a man like you and I.
We cannot accept this as Christian.
They would be moved probably tomorrow.What will happen to all the threads started by Jehovahs Witness and Mormons now that they cant reply or post here? Will they be closed or moved?
You might have a different understanding of the quote, however we need to go by what Joseph Smith and many other LDS leaders plainly stated.And I have explained that quote, in context. Of course, I have no control over how others choose to interpret our beliefs, but it still doesn't represent what we actually believe. Which means this action is not based on how we understand this quote, but on how you choose to apply it to us.
Not at all.Yes you guys do... Did you not just say that Christains believe that God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost are ONE in substance and essence?
That is the paradox of The Trinity understanding by modern Christians, and the reason Christian Theologians have given up trying to rectify the contradiction by declaring it a mystery.
...
Open.I need to close it up for few hours.
Thanks.
Yes you guys do... Did you not just say that Christains believe that God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Ghost are ONE in substance and essence?
That is the paradox of The Trinity understanding by modern Christians, and the reason Christian Theologians have given up trying to rectify the contradiction by declaring it a mystery.
Because if true, that means that if God the Son has an eternally incarnate body of flesh and bones... Then the Father "being ONE" in essence and substance must also possess the same Body of Flesh and Bones.
Just because you'll never admit that, does not solve your contradiction.
Yeah... Just like I said...Not at all.
Every creature represents a type of trinity. Body, spirit and mind.
Separate yet one. Trinity in nature is one of the most common designs of life.
I have no clue what you are attempting to explain.There is no contradiction--Christ, in Mary's womb, was no longer spirit as His Father, but flesh and bone, as us. And He keeps that humanity throughout eternity, though He is also still divine. He proved that when He asked to eat fishe Father
(Luk 24:39) Behold my hands and my feet, that it is I myself: handle me, and see; for a spirit hath not flesh and bones, as ye see me have.
I have no clue what you are attempting to explain.
Are you trying to say that only the Son has a body of flesh and bones, but not The Father??? Hardly sounds like they're one in substance does it?
So, Ed, the new owner is interested in making judgments regarding the hearts of the unorthodox Christians? I ask because this is a whole new way of structuring the board that we have never utilized in the past. In the past, while the unorthodox were relegated to Unorthodox Theology, their claimed relationship with Christ was never questioned. One could refer to themselves as Christian if they believed that they had a relationship with Christ. Now, the staff is saying that they can't call themselves Christian based on their theology rather than their heart condition. Isn't that a basic tenant of Christianity? That Christ doesn't save based on theology? After all, didn't Christ save us while we were yet sinners? It seems to me that the staff/owner is going someplace they shouldn't be going.
I'm wondering if forced icon changes are not far behind.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?