ViaCrucis
Confessional Lutheran
- Oct 2, 2011
- 40,074
- 29,850
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Lutheran
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
- Politics
- US-Others
I think you said that 3 prosopa represent the Trinity. Then you said that 3 prosopa represent a Modalistic view.
Yes, because both are true.
Modalists taught that God was one ousia and one hypostasis with three prosopa. Here prosopon is used to speak of the mode, expression, or "face" which the hypostasis (God) puts on when relating to us.
In Trinitarianism the use of prosopon is used differently to correspond with hypostasis; thus the hypostasis of the Father and the prosopon of the Father refer to the same thing.
Hence in the Definition of Chalcedon we read that the two natures (physes) concur en prosopon kai mian hypostasin, "in one person and hypostasis".
Some confusion over the precise use of some of these terms is what played a role in the Christological debates of the 5th century. The formula drawn up at Chalcedon is one which sought to avoid the perils of Nestorianism which asserted such a dichotomy of the two natures in Christ that there were, in fact, two prosopa, the Divine Logos and the man Jesus. This, of course, was what St. Cyril of Alexandria took so much issue with, and was rejected at Ephesus. All of the terms we use in our Christological formulae are kind of messy, and the terminology has had to be defined largely by rejecting certain positions as errant.
It was originally the Modalists that used homoousios, that is why Arius got so zealous when St. Alexander used it; for Arius that term was tainted by Modalism. But, of course, how the Modalists used it is very different than what Alexander meant and what was defined and clarified at Nicea.
-CryptoLutheran
Upvote
0