Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
"Behold, I am coming like a thief. Blessed is the one who stays awake and keeps his clothes, so that he will not walk about naked and men will not see his shame." [Revelation 16:15]If you see me naked, look the other way. If it offends you, think of what it is you do that might offend others. You talk of “rather than considering others, self indulgence....”, but aren’t you being rather judgmental about this?
You can't use "Judge not, lest ye be judged" to try and excuse your own sinfulness.Matthew 7 – “Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. “Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?”
Luke 6:37 – “Do not judge, and you will not be judged. Do not condemn, and you will not be condemned. Forgive, and you will be forgiven.”
Yep, that's exactly why I said "I'm not calling for violence. I'm saying Calvin and Knox would most likely have gotten pretty angry." in post #220 [found here].I bothers me when people endorse, such as you have done, the use of violence because we disagree. Live by the sword, die by the sword.
Speaking of pools, if your friends knew that you were a nudist and they said go ahead and swim nude we don't mind, would you do it or be too reserved to try it?
None of these cases bear semblance to the practice of nudists. Nudists walk around naked just because they "feel like it."Shame = feeling guilty for improper behavior.
That is what Adam and Eve had when they disobeyed.
When JESUS died on the cross and took our guilt and shame away have we forgotten?
Improper behavior is it when someone takes off his clothes to jump in the water to save a drowning victim?
Is it when working out in the fields where women and men take off there clothes to keep working to be more comfortable?
Is it improper behavior for em technicians at an accident scene to cut your clothes off to administer first aid?
Is it improper for a mother out in a public venue to strip off her child's clothing because the child had disturbed a nest of ground bees and are stinging her child?
All these scenes contain public nudity so for onlookers does this cause lust?
Revelations 16 starting at 14 Theses miracle-working demons conferred with all the rulers of the world to gather them for battle against the LORD on that great coming Judgment Day of GOD Almighty."Take note:I will come as unexpectedly as a thief ! Blessed are all who are awaiting me,who keep their robes in readiness and will not need to walk naked and ashamed. " [...] I myself will be naked and have my robe in readiness.
A very long post--longer than I would have time to write--that ignores the fact that Jesus died on a cross for our sins. We are washed clean.
Yet Christ does not impart cheap grace, the grace that allows us to keep on sinning freely because Christ died, but rather the costly grace that forces us to become His disciples and walk willingly in His ways and commands.
BTW, still waiting for any explanation as to why St. Peter fished nude.
Also if nudity is so evil why were baptisms in the early church performed in the nude?
Nothing wrong with going nude in public. I've been in nude beaches many times.
1] I never once said that nudity was evil, I said that it has a specific place, and that casually walking around naked in public outside of certain necessitous situations is not that place. Do you remember the rest of the verse about St. Peter fishing?
"Therefore that disciple whom Jesus loved said to Peter, "It is the Lord." So when Simon Peter heard that it was the Lord, he put his outer garment on (for he was stripped for work), and threw himself into the sea."
Why were baptisms in the early church performed in the nude? If you read any Church Fathers [which obviously you haven't], they remark that the idea of stripping nude in baptism was to mirror the shame of the stripped and crucified Christ:
"Having stripped yourselves, ye were naked; in this also imitating Christ, who was stripped naked on the Cross, and by His nakedness put off from Himself the principalities and powers, and openly triumphed over them on the tree. For since the adverse powers made their lair in your members, ye may no longer wear that old garment; I do not at all mean this visible one, but the old man, which waxeth corrupt in the lusts of deceit." [\QUOTE]
No need to throw insults here--"which obviously you haven't"--I have although probably not to the extent that you have. So nudity it acceptable for religious reasons. I don't recall you saying that before. So the nude churches that were spoken about earlier in this thread are fine.
The only Biblically acceptable times for going nude are [1] sex, [2] sleep, [3] work, and [4] at God's command.[\QUOTE]
So I was sinning during my recent visit to my female doctor. Right.
Walking around nude for fun and leisure is sinful, as you uncover your shame before others.
Nonsense. We have already been told that going nude would upset John Calvin. Frankly I think that would be a good thing since he was a murderer
Frankly I think that would be a good thing since he was a murderer.
And you've never backed up that point a single time.
I was never asked to back it up. We already agreed that he murdered Servetus. Isn't that enough?
No we didn't agree that he "murdered" Servetus. While Calvin argued for his death in his letter written to William Farel on August 20, 1553 [I should note that Luther and Melanchthon also called for his execution], it was ultimately the strongly anti-Calvinist Libertine party (who argued that Servetus should be burned at the stake rather than beheaded, as Calvin desired) under the guise of Geneva's Council of 25 that sentenced Servetus to death on October 24, 1553. John Calvin had no civil authority and was not a judge in Geneva, and thus, had no power of Servetus' execution, regardless of whether or not he desired it.
It was ultimately Ami Perrin [a Libertine and the chief opponent of Calvinism within the city of Geneva] who killed Servetus.
If we're going to blame John Calvin for his murder, we must also blame Luther and Melanchthon.