Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Then don’t do it if you wish to be modest. Your life, your choice.I don't. And when you became a Christian, it ceased to be your life. We as Christians are called to be modest. Please explain how public nudity is in any sense modest.
And you will have to answer to God for your choice. But if it is somehow modest, you can help enlighten us who don't believe it is modest by explaining why it is modest, and how it stands up to scrutiny. If you are right, this is your chance to help the church by doing this.Then don’t do it if you wish to be modest. Your life, your choice.
My life, my choice.
But if it is somehow modest, you can help enlighten us who don't believe it is modest by explaining why it is modest, and how it stands up to scrutiny. If you are right, this is your chance to help the church by doing this.
I'm not restricting modesty to a sexual thing here. You can wear very expensive clothing from neck to toe and be immodest. If you own a big, beautiful house, you can invite people over regularly, to show it off - that's immodest. To me, public nudism is in the same category as those things - showing off what you've got without a real need to do so. I understand that in all likelihood that it's not an arousing situation - I've taken life drawing classes in college, that was not arousing at all. I'm not uptight about nudity in a proper situation such as that. In that setting, adding clothing can take away from the purpose of the class, which is to learn to draw human anatomy. There's a need there. I don't see how public nudity on the other hand, fills any legitimate need. And where it is needless, that is where the pride can come in.I have half-joked earlier about having to be "modest" about my old, flabby body (can't be proud of it), but regarding modesty as decorum and not promoting sexual temptation, non-sexual nudity IS quite modest. By "non-sexual" I mean that people are going about their regular activities of life appropriate for the location (swimming, housecleaning, gardening, exercising, eating, talking with friends, etc.) as they usually do, but with little or no clothing.
Unless one has experienced and participated in non-sexual social nudity, this is very difficult for people (especially guys) to understand or believe, but it's true. When you walk through a group of nudists, you don't see aroused genitals, even on the teenage males. Why? Because it's not an arousing situation. Our society has us so conditioned to the "nudity is sexual" meme that, like Pavlov's dogs, we can't imagine a bell ringing without food being present.
Judging from your posts, you will never experience it, but you don't have to take my word for it. There are plenty of books, articles and blogs by nudists (including Christians) who will attest to the non-sexual nature of enjoying life without clothes, regardless of having both sexes present.
Of course, if people are doing sexual things with each other, the atmosphere will become "immodest" very quickly. Sex clubs and swinger clubs do exist, but such people are not true nudists. True nudists have no problem with sex, but it's not their focus, and not their reason for being nude.
Modesty - or the lack of it - is in the heart, not the clothes.
And you will have to answer to God for your choice.
To me, public nudism is in the same category as those things - showing off what you've got without a real need to do so.
I don't see how public nudity on the other hand, fills any legitimate need.
Garrison Keilor talked about a new church in town (Lake Wobegon) called "The Gospel Warehouse." It was a place where "You will pay less for your sins." He went on to say that it never really caught on and eventually had to close; because Minnesotans did not want to pay less for their sins, they wanted to pay MORE.We feel guilty because of what's the catch? We still think we need to pay a price for our forgiveness.We don't trust that JESUS took care of it once and for all.
I seriously doubt that. As a teen male I was aroused almost all the time.When you walk through a group of nudists, you don't see aroused genitals, even on the teenage males.
I seriously doubt that. As a teen male I was aroused almost all the time.
Meaning that the source of factual information can make it just as wrong as a lie.In the garden of Eden GOD asked a question of Adam " WHO TOLD YOU THAT YOU WERE NAKED ? "
I have seen men walking around nudist beaches with erections.
They certainly weren't wearing any clothesYou could be talking about those few perverts that nude beaches sometimes attract. I doubt that those are nudists.
They certainly weren't wearing any clothes![]()
OK - raging hard-on = gawker pervert; limp **** = normal nudist. Got it.Maybe so, but they sound like gawkers, not serious nudists.
I'm not restricting modesty to a sexual thing here. You can wear very expensive clothing from neck to toe and be immodest. If you own a big, beautiful house, you can invite people over regularly, to show it off - that's immodest. To me, public nudism is in the same category as those things - showing off what you've got without a real need to do so. I understand that in all likelihood that it's not an arousing situation - I've taken life drawing classes in college, that was not arousing at all. I'm not uptight about nudity in a proper situation such as that. In that setting, adding clothing can take away from the purpose of the class, which is to learn to draw human anatomy. There's a need there. I don't see how public nudity on the other hand, fills any legitimate need. And where it is needless, that is where the pride can come in.
Probably that we are born in sin.Why are we born nude? Maybe God's trying to tell us something...