- Jul 17, 2004
- 174,273
- 133,794
- Country
- New Zealand
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Perhaps this may be referring to a post by a member in a word game thread here in GE, after whom I posted. If so, then yes, I chose to continue on from the other member's post, even though I saw that their post was not in accordance with the OP criteria. The reason I did this, rather than quote the last post which was in accordance with the OP criteria, is because I thought that if that member came back to post again, they would see their mistake and know how to post from then on. To me, that is the kind and courteous way. If the member continued to post wrongly, I would then have dropped them a line privately about it.Hi Tom Brother
I am not allowed-to discuss which member(s) are offending
('cause(s)', of my concerns)
To give "an example" would also be tantamount-to 'pointing fingers'
So, let it suffice to say, that such errors, are repeatedly made
in what appears to be 'a wanton manner' ... ?
(with-disregard for established protocol) ~no effort made 'to-redress / correct'
Another member, then (apparently 'politely') ~proceeds, from the errant reply
After POSTING, I located the 'statement of purpose'
but chose not to report.... report, report, report
We all (from time to time) make mistakes
eg: reply to a previous page (non-current) reply too-late [times, have moved-along]
We do also replace wrong replies, with '..' / 'ooops'
I am referring to 'the breaking, of a sequence/progression'
with a reply, one, that bears no-connection to the preceding-post
which is then followed
by an apparently 'polite and kindly member'
~making no-mention of it's being awry /having-caused an interruption
~not then responding, to the post, made PRIOR TO, the one in 'error'
ie: Ignoring the error but not responding to it
I won't suggest 'teamplay'
or 'mind-games' ~is their purpose (it may well, not be so)
I hope not...
I make mention, ONLY because, my unwatched-threads list, is 'growing'
If, I IGNORE those-members, I myself WILL NOT see their posts
but will then 'undoubtedly' be posting so many errant replies (out of sequence)
In short; I do not need this
I'm sorry
If indeed I am one of those to whom this is referring, the 'apparently polite and kindly member' perhaps, then I wish all in GE to know that the 'non-suggestion' of teamplay and mind games is totally unfounded.
Last edited:
Upvote
0