Chit Chat (15)

[St. Helens]

That group isn't searchable by me. I don't have enough of a following by the right kind of people to make something like that.

How can you run a group if you have disabled your Facebook account? I also have a page that I operate. The rules there are pretty stringent about behavior.

 

[davedajobauk]

I do not follow the paths of others
and I only rub shoulders
with those who are walking in the same direction as me
I have been joined by those that see and understand the same 'problems'
Years of posting and reading, have made their recognition possible [often EASY]

I practice those same 'methods' here
I simply IGNORE those whom > say one-thing, but in-practice, behave contrarily

dave

 

[davedajobauk]

How can you run a group if you have disabled your Facebook account? I also have a page that I operate. The rules there are pretty stringent about behavior.

I have reopened my pages at FB
But post, only to my Timeline and "The Umbrella City Cafe and Atelier"
My friends, ONLY, will see notifications of my posting-there
I have friends, that I HAVE NOT invited into that group
(for reason, they, have friends and/or family
that freely make gross and/or evil comments
and those friends do not make any kind of a stand
to deplore/change those communications...)

I can also BLOCK notifications of
posts those persons make to my friends
[ my blocked list is several pages in length HUNDREDS ]

All my pages are FRIENDS ONLY
and while friends of friends may see a post (of mine) to a friend's page
Interaction and Following is DENIED

We are a Church

dave


PS

I prefer to have a few VERY GOOD FRIENDS
than Drown in a sea of unwelcome depravity

 

[St. Helens]

I have a pretty lengthy block list too. I have removed friends that post stuff that is depraved. I will be taking a hiatus from Facebook. After that I will prune everything.

 

[davedajobauk]

What is your FB username ?
~pass it to me... ~create a "new conversation" ~with me as recipient
(Private Message... in another terminology)
and I will invite you into the group
so that you may 'sample' a really clean group
of Christian friends

Using the experience of your years...
helps you to make
'better-choices and fewer-mistakes'

 

[davedajobauk]

Update on the Grenfell Tower fire



Locals claim Grenfell Tower fire death toll 'in hundreds'


Please pray

 

[davedajobauk]

PM calls Grenfell Tower an 'unimaginable tragedy'

 

[davedajobauk]

I am sure they will be sorry for
for not-installing sprinklers
for not ensuring adequate emergency egression routes
for installing inflammable cladding to the building
The resignation of the local government official should be followed by a prosecution



Grenfell Tower fire: Theresa May apologises for Government failings

 

[davedajobauk]

Grenfell Tower dead murdered by political decisions, says John McDonnell

 

[davedajobauk]

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/apos-hundreds-fire-doors-apos...

 

[davedajobauk]

Do you have concerns, about your identity 'online' ?

 

[nChrist]

Do you have concerns, about your identity 'online' ?

Yes, so I limit the real information about myself that could be used for identity theft or other problems.

 

[davedajobauk]

Thank you Tom 'Brother'
for confirming
that 'members' do (in-fact) read Stickied Threads

I thought they had become INVISIBLE

LOL

dave

 

[davedajobauk]

The Grenfell inquiry will be a stitch-up. Here’s why | George Monbiot

 

[davedajobauk]

Are these, the sole survivors of the hundreds of occupants ?



Just 14 Grenfell Tower families have accepted rehousing offers

 

[davedajobauk]

I have in past days, decided to unwatch some threads in GE50+
for reason, that I see
that the 'rules' regarding the following of the OP Threads
are, no-longer being displayed
and so, returning members / visitors, have taken to posting 'whatever they wish'

Such disruption, is really beginning to 'twang my strings'
>

Golden Eagles 50+ Statement of Purpose

The Golden Eagles 50+ forum is a fellowship and discussion forum for members who are in their fifties or older.

To facilitate open discussion that is healthy and productive, consider the following guidelines:

• Address the content of the post, not the poster, so that flaming doesn't occur.
• If a post isn't clear, ask for clarity before making assumptions.
• Stick to the topic of the thread. If you find that the discussion diverges onto a new topic then please consider starting a new thread, but let the current thread stay on topic.
• When someone shares a personal experience, it's their experience, and not open for being right or wrong. It is what it is. Please be respectful of what their experience was, even if yours was different.
• Please post in a manner that is respectful of both Christ and other members.
• Remember, make sure any graphics and links that you post do not violate the CF rules, as you are responsible for what you post. Double check for vulgarity and profanity that other sites may not care about.

If this happens in all threads in-which I participate, I will have no forums to visit

davedajobauk

 

[nChrist]

Hello Brother Dave,

I'm confused. I don't think that you're talking about statement of purpose and rules posted for each individual thread, but I don't know. Would you give us an example please?

 

[davedajobauk]

Hi Tom Brother

I am not allowed-to discuss which member(s) are offending
('cause(s)', of my concerns)

To give "an example" would also be tantamount-to 'pointing fingers'
So, let it suffice to say, that such errors, are repeatedly made
in what appears to be 'a wanton manner' ... ?
(with-disregard for established protocol) ~no effort made 'to-redress / correct'
Another member, then (apparently 'politely') ~proceeds, from the errant reply

After POSTING, I located the 'statement of purpose'
but chose not to report.... report, report, report

We all (from time to time) make mistakes
eg: reply to a previous page (non-current) reply too-late [times, have moved-along]
We do also replace wrong replies, with '..' / 'ooops'

I am referring to 'the breaking, of a sequence/progression'
with a reply, one, that bears no-connection to the preceding-post
which is then followed
by an apparently 'polite and kindly member'
~making no-mention of it's being awry /having-caused an interruption
~not then responding, to the post, made PRIOR TO, the one in 'error'
ie: Ignoring the error but not responding to it

I won't suggest 'teamplay'
or 'mind-games' ~is their purpose (it may well, not be so)
I hope not...

I make mention, ONLY because, my unwatched-threads list, is 'growing'
If, I IGNORE those-members, I myself WILL NOT see their posts
but will then 'undoubtedly' be posting so many errant replies (out of sequence)

In short; I do not need this
I'm sorry

 

[Star Dancer]

Hi Dave
I am sorry about my oops post, didn't mean to offend or upset.

 

[davedajobauk]

Hi Dave
I am sorry about my oops post, didn't mean to offend or upset.

It wasn't you Sis'..... at least you 'picked up' your guilty-feeling and felt an apology was due
and such is so not-apparent, with those ~that 'leave their mess' behind them
'and go on' as if everything is just fine and dandy....
which of-course it-isn't [Not, if you were, brought-up 'decently' anyway]

When a friend (of mine) is in-error / mistaken, I would assuredly give them a 'heads-up'
(alt. put them wise, that they should not look foolish / continue in-error)
But, this has not been the case
and losing-track (as a result of that failure) can seem like just one too-many 'Senior-Moments'

I don't wish to sound like an 'old fuddy-duddy'
but, either someone is not paying enough attention to the OP's, or else THEY
ARE otherwise-distracted with chatting to each-other, to even stay inline with the Thread's OP

No! it certainly isn't you Star Dancer Sis' :No: