I have no idea - is the internet interested in what Christians do?But let a group of Christians rig a vote though and it'll be all over the Internet, won't it?![]()
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I have no idea - is the internet interested in what Christians do?But let a group of Christians rig a vote though and it'll be all over the Internet, won't it?![]()
Another symptom is the creation of some incredibly ਗੂੰਗਾ threads.I get hives and writhe in pain all night long, often waking up in a sweat just in time to make it to the bathroom.
So you rake everyone here over the coals because Pluto is simply not called a planet anymore. As if that changes anything but saying "9 planets." But you get to ignore whatever a church does because you simply get to ignore it?This poster is not responsible for the actions of any church outside of his parking lot.
That's why the word "Independent" is in his belief system.
The difficulty was coming up with a clear definition that solved the problem. It's the same difficulty we always have trying to devise clear criteria for arbitrary categories in real-world continua. Like 'species', or 'adult' or 'fat'. It's another variation of the Sorites paradox.Indeed. Now, I do think the manner in which the vote was taken was a good example of the pettiness of interal organisation politics. I also think the new definition of planets is flawed - "clearing their orbital path" is a qualitative, not a quantitative distinction. But having thought "that's a bit off", with regard to the vote, and "that's a lousy example of a scientific definition", in respect of the that, I moved on to things that were actually important. Meanwhile, as you suggest, others seem to view incessant whining as more important.
Either that, or HOW it got demoted.So you rake everyone here over the coals because Pluto is simply not called a planet anymore.
Either that, or ALL born again people are saints.Phred said:See, if God told them to make the guy a saint in the first place how can they just unmake him a saint? It's almost as if your god doesn't exist at all...
You mean like this?If your god is real and if your churches and religions and all that falderall is real then at what point does your god actually bother to do anything?
I'm old enough to remember when the designation of two American territories were changed to that of state status with 2 stars being added to the flag. Nothing really changed that affected me. I do remember being taught why and how those stars on the flag were re-arranged to add those two new stars. The end result is that the designation of the 48 star flag changed to 50 stars. And the designation of those two territories also changed. Designation of things change, just like Pluto. Why your going on and on about this, I have no idea.And what if scientists rigged a vote to change the name of the state you live in?
Would you justify it by claiming "nothing's changed"?
Better yet, what if a shrewdness of scientists got together and demoted Rhode Island to the status of "dwarf state" by rigging a vote based on what they considered an inappropriate definition of "state" in the dictionary?
Would you take a star off of the American flag, then claim "nothing's changed"?
Did they rig a vote to do it, claiming that the definition of "state" in the dictionary wasn't adequate enough to account for some new discoveries?I'm old enough to remember when the designation of two American territories were changed to that of state status with 2 stars being added to the flag.
The Pluto IssueThey don't vote planets in or out. They come to a new agreement on a definition of what a planet is.
If they hadn't changed the definition, we'd have to add more planets to the list (Eris, Ceres, etc). They changed definition, which left Pluto out.
So another false claim by AV that he knows that he cannot justify. Is anyone surprised at all?Nice try.
Yup.But Pluto is still Pluto.
That map gave the wrong information for 76 years.
Or so some would like us to think.
If it was so blatantly wrong, they wouldn't have had to rig a vote to change that map.
Not allowing the planetary astronomers to vote, insured they would get what they were after.
Whoosh.Who cares? I never even heard of the IAU prior to Pluto's demotion.
I can see you as a [soon to be let go] detective:
BB: You say you saw the safe robbed?
Eyewitness: Yes, sir.
BB: Are you sure it was robbed?
Eyewitness: Yes, sir.
BB: How much money was in the safe before it was robbed, and how much is in there now?
Eyewitness: Well, I don't know. I just saw some guys rob it. And three state law agencies put out an APB on the robbers, as well as their method has been voted the agencies "Method of the Year" for 2021.
BB: Sorry ... can't help you.
Maybe you'd like to share with us why the American Dialect Society choose "plutoed" as its word-of-the-year for 2006?Whoosh.
Because they thought it was a great word?Maybe you'd like to share with us why the American Dialect Society choose "plutoed" as its word-of-the-year for 2006?
I think it's a great word too.Because they thought it was a great word?