No, not exactly.
But if you are taking 1 Timothy 2:12 literally - which some seem to be - women should not even speak, never mind teach.
But Priscilla taught Apollos. And sharing the Gospel involves an element of teaching - i.e explaining that someone is a sinner, showing the relevant Bible verses, explaining how God sent Jesus, and maybe even leading them in prayer.
The woman at the well did this on a basic level, without the Bible verses, when she went back to her town and said "come and see ...... could this be the Messiah?" Mary Magdalene did this when she went into a roomful of men, told them the news of the resurrection and gave them a further message.
The OT prophetesses did this when people consulted them and they said "this is what the Lord says".
1 Timothy 2:12 does not say that a woman can't preach, and there is no verse that says that they cannot be ordained. A number of people arguing against female ordination use this verse to "prove" it. But as soon as it is pointed out that if women have to be silent in church then it means no praying or prophesying, as Paul allowed in 1 Corinthians 11, they seem to argue against that.
If anyone take this verse literally and does not allow their wives/mothers/sisters/daughters/girlfriends to even say "amen" in church, never mind sing or read the Scriptures; I admire your consistency. But it would be wrong to insist that one part of it is taken literally but not the other - i.e to allow women speak so they can pray and worship, and yet say that the Bible forbids women from teaching.