chanter said:
I honestly feel that this thread is turning into a debate.
The questions were honestly answered.
H Chanter . .
I am very sorry you feel this way . . but I keep asking questions because either '
1) the actual question is not being answered . . in all the posts above, not one of them addressed the questions I was asking since my last post . .
or
2) I am not understanding the answer the way it is being worded . . .
If you don't want to answer my questions, then perhaps someone else will . . if you feel you are starting to debate, then it is a one sided debate . . so perhaps it is better for you to not answer the questons?
Really, I really am getting more and more confused by your answers . . so we are not communicating well . .
Poor communication does not a debate make . .
For instance - I asked this above:
Also, to help me understand eveything better, let me ask this . .
If a baptism, chrismation, and communion happen all at once, and then the baby is fully a part of the Mystical Body of Christ . . . what would this baby's status be if the rites were interrupted and the baby only received Baptism?
You responded with this:
If a child is baptized in an emergency because he/she is dying but survives miraculously, then as soon as possible, the Orthodox Priest starts the ceremony in the Church with the tonsuring, followed by Holy Chrismation and Holy Communion.
Your response did NOT answer my question at all!
I was concerned by a statement you made and posted this:
Are you saying that Baptized Catholic Children who are being brought up in the faith are doing this? Your words make it sound like this is a common occurance. . . I think way too broad a brush is being used here. . . but if you have sources, please share them . . I would like to be aware of things like this . .
You responded with an attack:
Please don't use "peace in Him" when you make a strong judgmental statement like this.
We studied this in my recent course in Marriage and Family and in my Health class. Today, my priest gave a very strong sermon about latch key children and their lack of supervision. He implored the parents to be responsible. He begged the godparents to be obedient to the Church in observing their responsibilities. Please check the facts yourself or take a college course. I must go study now. Bye.
What was so judgemental about my post? And if there was not a problem with Latch key children and lack of supervision in the Orthodox Church, why is your priest giving a strong sermon about it?
Yet, again, you did not answer my question! Instead, I found your response overly harsh . .
I also asked this:
If infants are capable of sin, then when they are baptized, all sin they have committed up to that point is forgiven . . and then they can receive the sacrament of chrismation and Communion . . I can understand why they could then receive communion . . BUT . .going with this logic, that an infant of 1 month can sin, then it is only logical that a baby of 3 months can sin as well.
AND this raises another question for me . . I am sorry if it seems I am so dense about this . . I am not trying to be . . . If I understand everything that has been said, this baby can continue to receive the body and blood of our Lord . . BUT, this baby is unable to communicate to a priest, or anyone else either, a confession of sins to receive absolution (A 3 month old can't talk, can't really point, can't respond in any meaningful way). . . so would not the child (I should have said baby to be more clear) be committing sin by partaking of communion with unconfessed sin on their soul? Is it not a sin to receive the sacrament of the Eucharist without first confessing one's sins?
And nothing in your response was directed at the specific questions asked!
I was specifically asking about
1) a 3 month old baby taking communion when they are unable to confess sin committed since they were baptized - would this baby not be committing sin by taking communion with unconfessed sin?
2) the orthodox position on someone of any age taking communion without first confessing their sins . .
If you no longer want to answer my questions just say so . . I am not forcing you to do anything . . and no one else is either . . It is not my purpose to upset you, just to understand what seems to me to be a confusing doctrine as presented thus far . ..
I will not get into a debate with you or anyone else concerning the answers . . but please, at least let them be real answers .. ones that answer the questions asked, not something else . .
Otherwise, only confussion is sown, and it is not being sown by me . .
Perhaps someone else here would be so kind to answer the specific questions asked . .
Peace in Him!