Solar & Astral Cycle at end of 50 Year Jubilee Cycle
(360 Days x 50 Years) + (4 Seasonal/Intercalary Days) =
18,000 Days + 200 Days = 18,200 Days
Lunar Cycle Reconciled at end of 50 Year Jubilee Cycle
(354 Days x 50 Years) +
(6 Overplus Days x 5 Years x 10 Intercalary Periods) +
(4 Seasonal/Intercalary Days x 50 Years) =
17,700 Days + 300 Days + 200 Days = 18,200 Days
You should start with the Tropical year:
The tropical year lasts for 365.24219 mean solar days.
365.24219 x 50 years = 18,262.1095 Days.
18,262.1095 Days - 18,200 Days = 62.1095 Days
Therefore, you are
62 days short!
The Enoch calendar fails, sorry but it’s true.
If not, you will need to explain why not. Simply
referencing back to your old posts doesn’t constitute proof and doesn’t explain why you believe it does.
And referencing proverbs can be seen as childish, and doesn’t contribute to the discussion.
The question was raised multiple times, yet not addressed or explained by you except quoting your incomplete posts.
However, in a mere fifty years, a calendar of strictly 364 days would have the Passover falling in winter, about sixty-two days too soon, because a calendar of strictly 364 days without any intercalation or leap year is 1.24219 days short in every year. This is due to the rate of rotation of the earth about its axis, (a day), and the time it takes for the earth to make one revolution in its orbit around the sun, (a year). There is no escaping these facts: they are what they are, whether you want to believe them or not.
50*1.24219 = 62.1095 days.
As previously stated, in fifty years the Humble Penny calendar would be just over 62 days off, and the Pesach would fall in winter, two months early. In twenty-five years his calendar is 31 days off.
Yet you insist your posts resolve the questions raised.
Now from the tropical year, we have 365.24 days.
The lunisolar calendar actually synchronises the calendar month to the moon, resulting in the
full moon always
falling on the evening of the 14th, or Passover.
Basically, the evening
between the 14th -15th.
This can also be used as a quick test for the calendar.
To synchronise the calendar with the solar cycle a leap month was employed, as you know and reject however the math actually supports the calendar and its synchronisation.
Now, this should not be confused with the 19-year cycle Hillel II introduced.
Looking at an 8-year cycle.
The lunar cycle is ±29.5 days long and a 29 then 30-day month cycle takes care of the average cycle and explains why observation, and equates to a 354 day year:
1st year meant 11 days
shorter than the Solar year
2nd year meant 22 days
shorter than the Solar year
3rd year meant 3 days
shorter than the Solar year, (Intercalary Month added)
4th year meant 14 days
shorter than the Solar year
5th year meant 25 days
shorter than the Solar year
6th year meant 6 days
shorter than the Solar year, (Intercalary Month added)
7th year meant 17 days
shorter than the Solar year
8th year meant 2 days
ahead of the Solar year, (Intercalary Month added)
OR
1st 354................vs................365
2nd 354...................................365
3rd
384..................................365
4th 354...................................
366
5th 354...................................365
6th
384..................................365
7th 354...................................365
8th
384..................................
366
= 2922 Days.......................= 2922 Days
Considering the leap days we are then in sync with the solar year.
Now I am well aware of the book of Jubilees, but we need to determine which pen is lying?
Now considering the Genesis account the Luni-solar actually is the only one that works without tampering with the calculation.
As I said to you in an earlier post, can you imagine
my disappointment when I tested it myself and realised that all the people arguing for the Enoch calendar had simply ignored or missed this?
Now something people generally ignore is the fact that the historical evidence must also support your calendar unless you only ignore them based on your bias towards them in the first place.
If we consider the definition for Easter Sunday dating back to Dionysius Exiguus, we see that
Easter Sunday is and was defined to fall on the first Sunday after the
Full Moon (14th to 15th) that falls on or after the equinox (March 19-21). If the Full Moon is on a Sunday, Easter is celebrated on the following Sunday.
Now it is only after you understand that the
full moon occurs on Pesach, the evening of the 14th, that the above would make any sense.
Therefore the early church also understood it this way.
Therefore, the evidence from scripture and history evidence suggests the opposite.
Shalom