• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Calvinist Baptist Talk

Status
Not open for further replies.

BT

Fanatic
Jan 29, 2003
2,320
221
51
Canada
Visit site
✟3,880.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Street Preacher said:
I answered the question, B, did you read my answer? I've seen the quesiton before, which book did you get it out of?
saint.gif
I hope you don't have a book open in front of you and you typing right out of it...
I promise you my friend that I am using no books beside the Bible, no advice, no help from others, no notes, I am getting no PM's, no other non-calvinists are helping me not here or in any other forum or form, nothing in this discussion... Can you say the same?
 
Upvote 0

BT

Fanatic
Jan 29, 2003
2,320
221
51
Canada
Visit site
✟3,880.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Street Preacher said:
Nice BT,
yawn.gif
I've seen it before.
Well at least it is good to see that you are maintaining your humility and teachable spirit...



We have to ask what is the context in which Paul is writting,
No we do not. Just answer the question. Of what (it is the gift of God, is Paul talking about?)

salvation as a competed task. (ex. For by grace are ye saved...or For by grace you have been saved...) Grace through faith as a gift of God brother, it's the only way. You would say faith, am I right?
No, you are absolutely wrong. That "it is" faith is your argument. Yeesh, stay on track ok? I asked you what is "it is" that Paul is referring to. You are using this quote to prove that "we're dead until God makes us alive then later we get saved if we're elect.."

So come on. This is your argument. Answer the question. What is "it" in the verse that you're using.


Yes the rest I'm ignoring until you answer my question.
 
Upvote 0

BT

Fanatic
Jan 29, 2003
2,320
221
51
Canada
Visit site
✟3,880.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Street Preacher said:
To continue on...

Gift of faith in the Bible that you wanted so bad: Thanking God for the faithfulness of Christians because it's not within the ability of the 'slave to sin', Col. 1:3-4, 2 Thess. 1:3. Faith finds it's orgin in God Eph. 6:23-24, Gal. 5:22
(note: faithfulness is translated from the Greek word 'faith.' see 'Potters Freedom' by James White), Phil. 1:29, Heb. 12:1-2. '...faith which comes through Him...Acts 3:16.
Is this what we've come to now? Is James White your hero now, because of a book that was a rebuttal? Is everything that James says right? Have you check his exegesis or have you just blindly followed him? Why would you accuse me of copying from books and then in the next post do just that and refer to an author of a nonbiblical book (as in it's not the Bible)? Are you trying to determine what is right or just defend a position?


On Ephesians 2

I know you intended to 'take me to school' and teach me a little english, so I thought I'd look into ahead of time. When speaking of the word 'that' in verse 2:8, James White has this to say:


I know you have a rule about using Greek unless you understand Greek, but I didn't, I quoted.

SP
amen.gif

No, that was not my intention, because (as hopefully you will get from this reply) it serves nothing. It's worse than disagreement. Do you so need to be right that you resort to this? That hurts my feelings, but I'll survive.
The purpose of the english remark was to show you that the verse that you are using does not apply to the doctrine that you're trying to show. It's a problem with your exegesis (which I'm thinking is not your own but derived from White and or others). Part of understanding Scripture is understanding grammar, that you can ask anyone. The rule about Greek is just because of that... it is usually not necessary to go back to the Greek. The English is sufficient. Let's end this pointlessness. I thought (foolishly perhaps) that if I took the time to really dig down into this doctrine with you, I could show you some things, and learn a few things myself. Over time as I've discussed this doctrine with people I generally don't get a chance to dig down with them (because the conversations degrade into this kind of thing very quickly for some reason).
I thought that this time in this thread mabey I would take the risk and do the digging, for our edification. I noticed in another thread that you mentioned fighting with people everyday on this issue. Why? What is it about this doctrine that drives you to be right? What is it about this doctrine that makes you seemingly ignore the rest of the doctrines. Why don't you spend some time in other areas of doctrine, then you might not need to fight with people everyday and you can still believe in calvinistic grace. What is the point of this? Examine yourself and figure out why you must be right and prove everyone else wrong who disagrees with you. That in itself should show you that there is a problem.

We said that this would not turn into this kind of thread.. did we lie?

Peace.
 
Upvote 0

JM

Confessional Free Catholic
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2004
17,477
3,736
Canada
✟880,120.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
BT said:
I promise you my friend that I am using no books beside the Bible, no advice, no help from others, no notes, I am getting no PM's, no other non-calvinists are helping me not here or in any other forum or form, nothing in this discussion... Can you say the same?
I'm using all the knowledge at hand. :thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

JM

Confessional Free Catholic
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2004
17,477
3,736
Canada
✟880,120.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
BT said:
Well at least it is good to see that you are maintaining your humility and teachable spirit...




No we do not. Just answer the question. Of what (it is the gift of God, is Paul talking about?)


No, you are absolutely wrong. That "it is" faith is your argument. Yeesh, stay on track ok? I asked you what is "it is" that Paul is referring to. You are using this quote to prove that "we're dead until God makes us alive then later we get saved if we're elect.."

So come on. This is your argument. Answer the question. What is "it" in the verse that you're using.


Yes the rest I'm ignoring until you answer my question.
Answered.
 
Upvote 0

JM

Confessional Free Catholic
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2004
17,477
3,736
Canada
✟880,120.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
BT said:
Is this what we've come to now? Is James White your hero now, because of a book that was a rebuttal? Is everything that James says right? Have you check his exegesis or have you just blindly followed him? Why would you accuse me of copying from books and then in the next post do just that and refer to an author of a nonbiblical book (as in it's not the Bible)? Are you trying to determine what is right or just defend a position?
James White is a Pastor in every sense of the word, a trustworthy teacher of God's word...I don't recall the Bible teaching us to disreguard such men.

No, that was not my intention, because (as hopefully you will get from this reply) it serves nothing. It's worse than disagreement. Do you so need to be right that you resort to this? That hurts my feelings, but I'll survive.
Sorry if I misunderstood your intent when you wrote, 'Let us go all the way back to elementary school english class and examine the verse k.' If I hurt your feelings, I'm sorry that wasn't what I meant to do.

The purpose of the english remark was to show you that the verse that you are using does not apply to the doctrine that you're trying to show.
I agree, so much more of this doctrine can be found in the Bible as a sum, from an understanding of the Bible as a whole, most calminians try to nail it down to one verse as you had asked me to do.

It's a problem with your exegesis (which I'm thinking is not your own but derived from White and or others). Part of understanding Scripture is understanding grammar, that you can ask anyone. The rule about Greek is just because of that... it is usually not necessary to go back to the Greek. The English is sufficient. Let's end this pointlessness. I thought (foolishly perhaps) that if I took the time to really dig down into this doctrine with you, I could show you some things, and learn a few things myself. Over time as I've discussed this doctrine with people I generally don't get a chance to dig down with them (because the conversations degrade into this kind of thing very quickly for some reason).
Brother, that was my hope as well. I believe choosing salvation is false and I have to battle false teaching and doctrine as a matter of faith.

I thought that this time in this thread mabey I would take the risk and do the digging, for our edification. I noticed in another thread that you mentioned fighting with people everyday on this issue. Why? What is it about this doctrine that drives you to be right? What is it about this doctrine that makes you seemingly ignore the rest of the doctrines. Why don't you spend some time in other areas of doctrine, then you might not need to fight with people everyday and you can still believe in calvinistic grace. What is the point of this? Examine yourself and figure out why you must be right and prove everyone else wrong who disagrees with you. That in itself should show you that there is a problem.
I'm attacked because of my Biblical beliefs daily, find a Christain that isn't and you'll find a wordly Christian... Take a quick tour back over that last 10 pages or more and you'll see the attacks, I could see them and someone pointed them out to me in a pm not so long ago.

We said that this would not turn into this kind of thread.. did we lie?

Peace.
Like I wrote, I'm not the only one who can see the hostle attacks over this doctrine in this thread....it's silly to think that all are coming from my side of the fence.

Peace to you as well BT, God bless.

SP
PS: At least when I visit a Reformed Baptist Church they respect (and not attack) by dispensational outlook, as long as Grace is understood I'm welcomed as a brother.
 
Upvote 0

bleechers

Christ Our Passover!
Apr 8, 2004
967
74
Alabama
Visit site
✟1,509.00
Faith
Christian
Like I wrote, I'm not the only one who can see the hostle attacks over this doctrine in this thread....it's silly to think that all are coming from my side of the fence.

OK, OK... I know I'm 'sposed to stay out of it... I just wanted to interject a point of information... I asked three times concerning Proverbs 1 and explained Romans 5, 8 and 9 twice... to no response... I hope those posts were not regarded as "attacks"... if they were, please know nothing of the sort was intended. :)

Back to your regularly scheduled thread...
 
Upvote 0

BT

Fanatic
Jan 29, 2003
2,320
221
51
Canada
Visit site
✟3,880.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Street Preacher said:
James White is a Pastor in every sense of the word, a trustworthy teacher of God's word...I don't recall the Bible teaching us to disreguard such men.
No don't disregard such men. The comment was really in reply to your wondering if I was copying from a book, which I was not, which you were. I just found that kind of ironic and funny. As advice I would say don't put too much faith in men. They are able to make mistakes. Even John McArthur who I consider one of the greatest Bible teachers of our time has a list of retractions on his website, regarding some doctrinal positions that he's changed over the years as his understanding grew. Humility is a key to Christianity. Do you see that with White? <- rhetorical.


Sorry if I misunderstood your intent when you wrote, 'Let us go all the way back to elementary school english class and examine the verse k.' If I hurt your feelings, I'm sorry that wasn't what I meant to do.
no big deal, forgiven, forgotten.

I agree, so much more of this doctrine can be found in the Bible as a sum, from an understanding of the Bible as a whole, most calminians try to nail it down to one verse as you had asked me to do.
Do you know why that is? It is because the doctrine of grace (calvinism) is not a purely scriptural concept. Whether you'd admit it or not (btw many of your calvinist scholars do admit that). It is a doctrine created by the addition of human logic applied to various scriptures. That is why I asked you the question.. because it is unanswerable. You will never find in scripture the doctrines that you preach. That's not an attack on calvinism, it's simply a fact. In order to support your doctrine you have to use logic on scripture and derive your doctrine from the logic. That was the whole point. No matter what scripture you brought out, it is easily shown to not mean what you think it means when interpreted plainly (with nothing added). Is that important? Not to some, but it is to me.

Brother, that was my hope as well. I believe choosing salvation is false and I have to battle false teaching and doctrine as a matter of faith.
Now we come to the crux of the matter. You here accuse me of teaching false doctrine, and set out as your (divine?) duty to battle with me (us). Have I ever accused you of promoting false doctrine? Have I not said on several occaisions that it's not a big deal (to me) if you believe in Grace or not? Now you have called me and your own pastor heretics (spreaders of false doctrine). So am I your brother? Do you make brothers of heretics? If I'm a heretic I suppose I'm not saved in your eyes.


I'm attacked because of my Biblical beliefs daily, find a Christain that isn't and you'll find a wordly Christian... Take a quick tour back over that last 10 pages or more and you'll see the attacks, I could see them and someone pointed them out to me in a pm not so long ago.
I wasn't attacked the day before yesterday for my beliefs. So am I now a worldy Christian? Actually I haven't been attacked today either. So am I now a carnal Christian? Such generalizations are goofy, as is a victim-complex. Are we as Christians (if I am one) not overcomers? Are attacks on us not actually attacks on Christ? Heck perserverance is a calvinist doctrine, I thought for sure you'd have that one. It's not easy when people disagree with us but that doesn't mean that they are attacking you. Your understanding, or your interpretations mabey but it's surely not an attack on you. Even an attack on the Gospel that you preach isn't an attack on you, it is an attack on Christ.

Like I wrote, I'm not the only one who can see the hostle attacks over this doctrine in this thread....it's silly to think that all are coming from my side of the fence.
You're becoming paranoid. Any argument is two-sided. I see a lot of disagreement here but not much in the way of all out attacks, from either side. Regardless, if you were attacked what does Jesus say to do?

Peace to you as well BT, God bless.

SP
PS: At least when I visit a Reformed Baptist Church they respect (and not attack) by dispensational outlook, as long as Grace is understood I'm welcomed as a brother.
So if you went to a Reformed Baptist Church and didn't have an understanding of Grace, then what? Have you been attacked in your church? Are you going to tell me and the rest of the faceless people in this forum that your pastor has treated you wrong? SP you are gathering a lot of head knowledge but there is much more to being a Christian, and ironically you have much to learn about grace. Examine your fruits. I'll pray for you more.
 
Upvote 0

JM

Confessional Free Catholic
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2004
17,477
3,736
Canada
✟880,120.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
BT,

You know my Pastor so you know he's never treated me wrongly at all. It was because of him that I sat down and re-thought the Doctrines of Grace, starting from square one and read the Bible. Pastor and I still disagree on this issue.

You claim I'm not humble or have a spirit of learning, while, I you stand accused of the same things.

SP
PS: bleechers, no you didn't attack Grace with your questions. Thanks BT for not being so harsh.
 
Upvote 0

JM

Confessional Free Catholic
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2004
17,477
3,736
Canada
✟880,120.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
Oh well, we tried to have this talk without getting too heated. I hold no hard feelings against anyone, many better men then we have tried to sort this out and have failed as well.

God bless,

Street Preacher
 
Upvote 0

@@Paul@@

The Key that Fits:Acts 28
Mar 24, 2004
3,050
72
54
Seattle
✟18,581.00
Faith
Baptist
Street Preacher said:
Oh well, we tried to have this talk without getting too heated. I hold no hard feelings against anyone, many better men then we have tried to sort this out and have failed as well.

God bless,

Street Preacher
Fair enough... But at any point did you question how you interpreted certain passages??

I'll be the first to admit, I did... :holy: :kiss:
 
Upvote 0

theseed

Contributor
Site Supporter
Dec 25, 2003
6,026
132
Clarksville, TN
Visit site
✟53,288.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Paul said:
20) For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.

Notice even the nonbelievers have something to believe?? i.e. They choose NOT to believe because they LOVE darkness rather than light.
You left out v. 21 which says that if we come into the light, it was by God's power alone.

This reminds me of Adam and Eve. They hid from God because they feared that thier deeds would have been exposed. This is astounding if you realize that moments before they had to know about God's willingness to forgive.


Everything in CREATION point to this FACT, so every man is without an excuse.
(21) Because that, when they knew God, they glorified him not as God, neither were thankful; but became vain in their imaginations, and their foolish heart was darkened.​
every person at some point in his/her life will realize there must be a God, and they will glorify him not.
If they knew God, then they would not have rejected God. This is one of the central themes in John's writings. It is true that all men are without excuse. There are many who sincerely deny that the world is created.



Romans 2:14-15, even pagan Gentiles who don't have the Law sometimes follow it by their nature.

Actually, that passage condemns the moralist, because he is guilty of the same things he claims to follow.

Rom 2:15 Which shew the work of the law written in their hearts, their conscience also bearing witness, and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another
The saved person is the one who has the law written on their heart--this is regeneration. Notice that we don't write the law on our heart, but God does.

Paul, do you deny that we are slaves to sin when we are without the Holy Spirit?


Bleechers said:
It is God's will to bless and to save. He wants to bring us to a place He has prepared for those who believe. Those who listen are blessed of God because He has rewarded faith (not a work, Rom 4:4-5)

Actually, that passage says that we deserve rightousness because of our faith. Therefore, St. Paul is not talking about grace (unmerited favor, but merited favor).

Does anyone have any other bible verses?
 
Upvote 0

JM

Confessional Free Catholic
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2004
17,477
3,736
Canada
✟880,120.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
@@Paul@@ said:
Fair enough... But at any point did you question how you interpreted certain passages??

I'll be the first to admit, I did... :holy: :kiss:
Yes I did, but not during this thread.

When I first came to Christ this was a doctrine that stood out from a basic reading of the Bible, the Bible drips with God's Grace. I didn't attend a Reformed or Calvinist Church, in fact, I didn't know how hated (what came to be called) the TULIP was. I thought this was understood by all, when I shared my understanding with fellow Christians they said it was nothing more then 'rotten Calvinism.' I kinda freaked out a bit, I knew in my heart it was true, God and His word confirmed it but many good men and women denied it. The crux of the issue is man fighting for his right to choose, when I was saved it was a sudden experiance. God called me by my name and I answered willing, but before the call came I would never have chosen Him. In fact, I become a Christian months after my last attendance at a Church. The preaching of the Gospel lingered in my heart and when God called me, I came running.

I bounced around in a couple of different Churches of a couple of years and then joined an independent fundie Baptist Church where they did call me out on the 'Calvinist' issue. I spent a month going over just scripture, checking and double checking my understanding of Scripture and this is how I came into contact with more and more Reformed works. They were right, it wasn't me, it's God's word. I have to go to bat when it comes to Grace, it's how I was saved, it's what the Bible teaches.

My intent of this thread was for calvinistic baptist to have a place to talk and yes, have arminians and calminians ask questions but it just didn't work out. I hope I didn't offend anyone, my posts were too strong I see that now...hind sight is 20/20.
 
Upvote 0

@@Paul@@

The Key that Fits:Acts 28
Mar 24, 2004
3,050
72
54
Seattle
✟18,581.00
Faith
Baptist
theseed said:
You left out v. 21 which says that if we come into the light, it was by God's power alone.

This reminds me of Adam and Eve. They hid from God because they feared that thier deeds would have been exposed. This is astounding if you realize that moments before they had to know about God's willingness to forgive.
Yes, God's power which is shown by His creation... Didn't i say that?? :confused:

Everything is by God's power alone, i'm not questioning that.... Read the book of Daniel. ;) God leaves the choice to "obey and heed to His power" up to us.

...Here's yet another aspect of God which we will NOT understand until the other side of Glory...

Rom 10:8-11 KJV
(8) But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;
(9) That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
(10) For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
(11) For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.​
...I am happy to leave it at that.
 
Upvote 0

JM

Confessional Free Catholic
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2004
17,477
3,736
Canada
✟880,120.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
Happy b-day Paul.




Rom 10:8-11 KJV



(8) But what saith it? The word is nigh thee, even in thy mouth, and in thy heart: that is, the word of faith, which we preach;
(9) That if thoushalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.
(10) For with the heart (keeping in mind what the Bible has to say about man's heart) man believeth unto righteousness; (keeping in mind what the Bible has to say, again) and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.
(11) For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.


That's a BIG if.



 
Upvote 0

@@Paul@@

The Key that Fits:Acts 28
Mar 24, 2004
3,050
72
54
Seattle
✟18,581.00
Faith
Baptist
Street Preacher said:
Happy b-day Paul.


That's a BIG if.



[/indent]
Hey thanks!!

If is a conditional statement... IF THOU SHALT... :)

Which is one reason why I am OK to leave the choice to believe up to me (thou). - I might stand corrected, the other side of glory however... :)
 
Upvote 0

JM

Confessional Free Catholic
Site Supporter
Jun 26, 2004
17,477
3,736
Canada
✟880,120.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Others
Quote: All spiritual blessings have their origin in the person and work of Christ (Eph 1:3). Efficacious grace is a spiritual blessing. Dispensationalists, like Calvinists, also teach the doctrine of efficacious grace and that this grace is applied by the Holy Spirit to the elect only (not to the non-elect). Therefore it infallibly follows that they must believe that Christ died for the elect (to secure effectual grace) in a way that He did not for the non-elect. Therefore, either dispensationalists really do believe in the biblical doctrine of particular redemption without knowing it or they promote an unintelligible system of theology that is divorced from Christ with regard to the application of the work of redemption.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.