Francis Drake
Returning adventurer.
- Apr 14, 2013
- 4,002
- 2,518
- Country
- United Kingdom
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- UK-Independence-Party
This is about the peoples choice, They voted leave in 2016. But it is not a dishonest analysis of the results to see a majority for Remain in the voting patterns from the EU election. Particluarly since all the latest polls on this issue put Remain on top. Whatever the Tory and Labour party politicians committed to in their manifestos was decisively rejected by the electorate and a clear demand for revision of those policies was declared. The BREXIT party wants a hard BREXIT as soon as possible and thought the Tories were simply not delivering. The Lib Dems and Greens and Nationalists and Change who together got some 6% more votes than the BREXIT and UKIP combined rejected the deal on the table and expressed a clear preference to remain in Europe. The official policies of both parties will probably be revised as a result of the wipe outs that Labour and the Tories experienced. The Tories are likely to elect a hard BREXiTEER though how he is going to implement that against the wish of parliament and the people is anyones guess. Labour are dominated by hard left activists who want to build a Marxist state in the aftermath of the BREXIT disaster and what they think will be the inevitable fall of the Tory government after implementing BREXIT. So as long as these people are in charge of Labour any calls for a second referendum might not even include an option to vote remain.
In your blind desire for BREXIT you are missing what is happening here. BREXIT is going to be a disaster, Corbyn will probably become PM in the wake of that disaster and that will mean a double whammy for Britain with a government that cannot rule in charge of an unmitigated disaster.
The only way out of this dilemma is Revocation and the public actually see that and want that. What is criminal here is the deliberate obstruction of their politicians and especially in the Labour party of their expressed wishes.
Isaiah5v20Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!
(............….and who substitute winners for losers and losers for winners.)
There's no point in me entering into a discussion with someone who calls black white and good evil.
Until you start using the normal commonly accepted interpretations of words, sentences, and arithmetic, instead of your private meanings, you will REMAIN entirely correct in your own little world.
But beware, the scripture I quoted is a warning. Woe is not just a quaint appendage to the verses. It has meaning to all those who transgress the words.
Isaiah5v20Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil; Who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness; Who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!
Proverbs12v17He who speaks the truth declares what is right, but a false witness speaks deceit.
Proverbs12v22Lying lips are detestable to the LORD, but those who deal faithfully are His delight.
Upvote
0