Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
That's a pretty bold statement about The Catholic Church. There are parables, instructions, history, and poetry. Many dimensions to the Bible.
True, I've run into that on this website and others for sure. They wouldn't believe anything a Catholic said no matter what it was.You think a creationist is going to care about any of that?
And I know plenty of Christian denominations to whom "Catholic" is a nasty word...
such as?Is ONLY the work of bible scholars to be considered?
No other scholar?
Lots of possibilities.such as?
I have no idea why you think that bible scholars do not have expertise in other areas.Lots of possibilities.
Bible scholars are not much for the study of ancient
languages. They are not archaeologists, whose work also
bears on biblical matters.
Or, still more obviously, there is the matter of how
literally factual the bible is.
The book itself gives little info on just what is to
be taken literally.
" Jesus is a door", well, common sense lets anyone
know he never had hinges. No special scholarship
needed there.
How about "Noah's ark"?
I dont know that bible scholars have ever worked
that out as literal or what. Have they?
If not-
Scholars in such as physics, geology, biology
etc could be consulted on that, being people with
valid information as to whether it actually happened.
Bible scholars have no qualifications at all in such
matters.
I have no idea why you think that bible scholars do not have expertise in other areas.
It's true that Bible scholars are not typically geologists. However they are typically experts in ancient languages, because that's a key part of exegesis. They aren't normally archaeologists, but many of them follow the literature in that field and have a reasonable degree of expertise.Lots of possibilities.
Bible scholars are not much for the study of ancient
languages. They are not archaeologists, whose work also
bears on biblical matters.
Lots of possibilities.
Bible scholars are not much for the study of ancient
languages. They are not archaeologists, whose work also
bears on biblical matters.
Or, still more obviously, there is the matter of how
literally factual the bible is.
The book itself gives little info on just what is to
be taken literally.
" Jesus is a door", well, common sense lets anyone
know he never had hinges. No special scholarship
needed there.
How about "Noah's ark"?
I dont know that bible scholars have ever worked
that out as literal or what. Have they?
If not-
Scholars in such as physics, geology, biology
etc could be consulted on that, being people with
valid information as to whether it actually happened.
Bible scholars have no qualifications at all in such
matters.
It's true that Bible scholars are not typically geologists. However they are typically experts in ancient languages, because that's a key part of exegesis. They aren't normally archaeologists, but many of them follow the literature in that field and have a reasonable degree of expertise.
Sure. I think the answer is clear that these things didn’t happen. But there are also purely literary reasons to suspect that at least some of this isn’t historical.Thats fine as long as i am not considered to be a scholar with
expertise on the bible because i read some articles.
But that is not what I was talking about.
No amount of studying he Bible alone will provide an
answer to such as whether Sodom and Gomorrah,
6 day creation, flood or Exodus really happened.
For those, one has to look outside the pages.
Thats just it.Sure. I think the answer is clear that these things didn’t happen. But there are also purely literary reasons to suspect that at least some of this isn’t historical.
Is your pic from a Jack Chick tract, Philo?
Who's that guy that has to catch that Zeta beam to go to another planet and see his girlfriend?Lol! Hardly.
But I'll give you three more gamma charged guesses in which to figure it out ...![]()
Who's that guy that has to catch that Zeta beam to go to another planet and see his girlfriend?
Is it Adam Strange?
I grew up on DC comics.You just had to ask me about the one DC hero that as a kid I completely skipped. Couldn't you've asked me about Superman or Batman or Captain Marvel? ...or even Alfred E. Neuman? Geez, AV!!!![]()
I grew up on DC comics.
I know the 1960's JLA (Snapper Carr era) and all their names and secret identities, as well as their weaknesses.
And I can recite GL's mantra when he powers his ring up too!![]()
How far away is the train?Let's not beat around the bush here. Is evolution a salvation issue?
Is it possible to accept Genesis as allegorical and still be saved by the Grace of Christ?
Because it seems to me that if the answer is yes, debating it is pointless for creationists, and if the answer is no, debating it is pointless with creationists.
I'm just curious regarding what people really think coming into these discussions...
Sorry ... not a MC fan here.See, this shows our generation gap. I know the JLA "as it was" in the 1970's ... but then I ran into Spider-Man and the Hulk and my life became marvelous forever after that ...![]()