this is crazy
I have to say i totally agree with the bishop francis is a fundamental danger to the faith and the souls he is supposed to care for
Bishop Schneider: “Convert” or “renounce the papacy”
Schneider seems very confused, accusing Francis' progressive followers, rather than his own 'traditionalist' clan, of clericalism. He makes a shibboleth out of receiving the Sacred Host in the hand, in the same way that the Pharisees in the Gospel made a shibboleth of an exaggerated observance of the sabbath, ironically in a curiously related context, i.e. when his men ate ears of corn, growing in the fields they had passed through.
That exaggerated prioritisation of the Sabbath duties would, in reality, have been, by way of claiming an exaggerated reverence for themselves that they sought from the people ; and I fear clericalists of the 'bitter-ender' Tridentine persuasion among the clergy of all ranks of the hierarchy would be motivated by the same 'aspiration'.
The ovine metaphor is just that - a metaphor. It is adopted, 'other Christs', 'priests after teh ordermof Mechisedek, we hope, who receive Holy communion, not 'nobodies', required to imitate barnyard animals - mythical, at that, since farm animals do not need to be hand-fed. Clericalism at its worst.
Difference is the law of the church says no one other than the ordained minister ( priest) should touch the eucharist. Handling the eucharist started in holland after V2 The holy see granted an exception in their case then everybody piled in asking for this exception
The prefered and really what they mean is the correct way of recieving is kneeling and on the tongue
Are they calling for the pope to step down?Question: the Popes are supposed to be chosen by God, right? It must be that way if he's all knowing, all powerful, and determines everything. Even discounting that though, why would God put a Pope in power who could change the faith unless He wanted it that way?
Plus, if the Pope is supposedly infallible on matters of faith, then must what he officially says in terms of faith-matters be seen as God-given fact? If not, how can we tell? Are we cherry-picking? If Popes aren't infallible in matters of faith, how can we know what is true of our faith if God doesn't give signs and messages like he used to?
Yes, the law of the church is not inviolable, and must have undergone many changes over the centuries.
Somethings are somethings are not.
The Pope is not chosen by God. Nor is he put in power by God...Question: the Popes are supposed to be chosen by God, right? It must be that way if he's all knowing, all powerful, and determines everything. Even discounting that though, why would God put a Pope in power who could change the faith unless He wanted it that way?
Plus, if the Pope is supposedly infallible on matters of faith, then must what he officially says in terms of faith-matters be seen as God-given fact? If not, how can we tell? Are we cherry-picking? If Popes aren't infallible in matters of faith, how can we know what is true of our faith if God doesn't give signs and messages like he used to?
troll?
And, where is the answer to my question?There is only one Heavenly Father
Fair enough. I like the Anglos, too.I've thought about it, but the Anglican church seems to be a better fit for what I believe.
Considering the starting point...Wow how far has this thread been derailed... this is crazy
All I know about Catholic church is inquisition and burning multitudes beautiful smart women of Europe as witches and also selling indulgentias for sins and worshiping human gods like Mary or saints. Also forced conversions of muslims and judaists to Catholics and killing of Gugenots etc protestants by 100s of thousands in one night.
All of that and perhaps more is far away from Jesus like the east from the west. Papa of Rome is like god, all he says is final divine authority. This is like robbing God of His throne. I have Spirit of God in me, no need in external sinful erroneous papas
The Pope is not chosen by God. Nor is he put in power by God...
This is all the work of man's hand. God knows it's going to happen and nothing surprises Him. God allows it to happen but doesn't control it.
All the leaders of the past and the ones to be chosen in the future are known to God and He will use their decisions for His will.
And, where is the answer to my question?
It's said though 1. that God controls everything, even the roll of the die, and 2. all governments/those in power are put in power by God. So yes, they are all chosen by God including the Pope. Either "God is in control" of everything according to his divine plan or he's not.
It's more comicated that that... There is also Satan...
You have been given a one-dimensional, biased "history" - Such is not real history: it is more accurately called propaganda, not history. The Catholic Church has enemies who profit from this mis-education, such that they can gather people into their own "christianity", to support their own agendas and plans and goals. It is sad, it is untrue, it is deceitful.
Look for a Catholic version of history! If it is a good history, it will bring out both the good and the bad in the organized Church.