Yep. 2+2=4 is one of the things that can be proven true though, so I don't think it helps your case.
Honestly, I can't defeat that kind of nihilism, and I don't think anyone can.
I'm just pointing out that putting all claims on the same level of uncertainty makes all thought worthless. You're going to have to make some assumptions in order to believe anything.
Eh... If it's impossible to know anything as true, then kind of, yeah.I'm not a nihilist.
You can hold beliefs, but none of them are true because they're mere abstractions of reality.Or we can hold beliefs about the world but acknowledge our beliefs about the world are not eternal truths.
It is subjectively real to the person suffering; so yes.
Not quite. Morality is a judgment concerning the right vs wrong of the suffering.
Yes. it implies wrong doing, but that implication is still a subjective opinion.Doesn’t the term “injustice” imply wrong doing, which is causing the suffering?
Yes. it implies wrong doing, but that implication is still a subjective opinion.
Eh... If it's impossible to know anything as true, then kind of, yeah.
I think you meant to say that numbers aren't concretes. Saying that something exists but is not real is a self-contradictory statement.Numbers aren't real... they are abstractions of reality and exist only as concepts.
This statement is self-refuting.It's impossible to know anything as absolutely true. I believe in provisional truths.
Thoughts exists in your head, but are not real.I think you meant to say that numbers aren't concretes. Saying that something exists but is not real is a self-contradictory statement.
Hmm. Another self-contradiction. Something exists but is not real. If something is real, does it exist?Thoughts exists in your head, but are not real.
Actually Christ tells us the 2 commandments that sum up morality.There are two constant, immutable rules in the Bible.
Obey God.
Don't be gay.
What "sums up morality" was not the question.Actually Christ tells us the 2 commandments that sum up morality.
I think you meant to say that numbers aren't concretes. Saying that something exists but is not real is a self-contradictory statement.
^This is not a provisional truth claim.
Your above truth claim contradicts this truth claim. Do you see that as a problem?
I see.I am a philosophical nominalist. I don't believe abstractions or general categories actually exist.
No. Subjectively real is not the same as objectively real. Objectively real means it can be demonstrated as real using empirical facts, subjectively real means based on the subject’s beliefs and opinions. However, that which is objectively real, is also subjectively real,(that which is proven true, is also believed true) however everything that is subjectively real is not always gonna be objectively real. (just because you believe it doesn’t mean you can prove it to be true).True, but I thought we agreed subjectively real, is still real(objectively real)?
Or has there been a misunderstanding between us?
By definition; if it only exists within your mind, it is not objective.to clarify; I tend to think of the term ‘subjective’ as what’s objectively happening within a person’s mind.
Thinking of it in this way makes it possible to determine if what someone’s thinking is objectively right or wrong(assuming they’re capable of telling you what they’re truly thinking).
Everything that is real exists, but not everything that exists is real, because it is possible for something to only exist only in your mind, and that which only exists within your mind is not real. (even though there are things that can exist in your mind that appear to be real to you)Hmm. Another self-contradiction. Something exists but is not real. If something is real, does it exist?
I see, Thank you for answering Ken.Everything that is real exists, but not everything that exists is real, because it is possible for something to only exist only in your mind, and that which only exists within your mind is not real. (even though there are things that can exist in your mind that appear to be real to you)