Ok, lets talk genesis:
(1:1-2:3) The Genesis 1 account conflicts with the order of events that are known to science.
Based on what? You choose to believe scientists who say we've been here billions of years, but did you know there are many scientists--creation scientists--who oppose carbon dating methods? The thing is, they are shunned or bullied into keeping their views out of mainstream science. Have you ever seen Ben Stein's "Expelled" If you refuse to look at ALL the evidence for Christianity, God, and the Bible you will have a biased view on the whole matter. Also, you will have a religion called "science."
Also he says the moon is simply a 'light', nothing more.
You think it's made of cheese?
You have said there are too many "emotional" responses as to the proof of Christianity. This may surprise you. I don't care what aspect of Christianity you look at, in my opinion, we live in a post-Christian society today. I wonder. When you think of the word "Christian" what do you even think of any more? Religion is not Christianity. Believing in Jesus and only Jesus is Christianity. I'm afraid you don't have a clear picture.
"But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost: In whom the god of this world (that old serpent the devil) hath blinded THE MINDS of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them." II Cor 4:3,4
How old are you? It looks like you're 19? I am sad that you are so hardened against the truth this early in your life.
Yes, I am simply 19. Well truth, like I said before, its only relative. All I am saying is that we don't know for sure. No one has the true truth, our truths are created by our experiences and beliefs. So to say you have the 'truth', I am completely sure, to a certain degree, that you don't know. One of the famous quotes on quantum mechanics is If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics".
Lets take an example of a box, I ask what is inside the box? Then you will say a bunny, and then you get millions to agree that its a bunny, another person says its a dragon, the next a phone. In reality, no one knows for sure what its inside the box. So you to say that you know, I say you don't know.
So what do I need to know to accept a certain idea of what is inside the box, well hard evidence. This is the diffrence between us atheists, agnostics, and non-believers, and the rest of the worlds believers.
It is only natural to give an explanation, it gives the person a comfort and security that they have the answer. Well for us, we are just fine without knowing, although our own curiosity still wants to find out what really is inside that box. So me must investigate. Skepticism.
So from a result from skepticism, I don't believe. How I ask, am I wrong to doubt, and not know?
"You think it's made of cheese?"
No I don't. The crust of the Moon is composed mostly of oxygen, silicon, magnesium, iron, calcium, and aluminum. There are also trace elements like titanium, uranium, thorium, potassium and hydrogen. (I love astronomy=))
All I was saying is that the bible says its just a light, like the stars. A light to illuminate the earth for humans, a gift from god.
The point I was making is that the science in the bible is man made, not god made, which explains the level of knowledge they had at that time. So its more probable that humans, heck even aliens, than a god to say that.
Yes, I know what is christianity, just the belief that there was a man back 2,000 years ago that saved all humans from the original sin, and he is god's only son.
I do not know for sure that he was a real man, lets say he was, I don't think he was the son of a supernatural deity. If he is real, I say he is nothing more than a cult leader with a mere 12 followers, preaching that he is the son of god, and did good things to people, just like anyother cult leader today, which I think there are 22 now that claim just that.
What do I think its more probable? I think he is just a ripoff version of horus, the Egyptian jesus. The similarities are shockingly familiar, along with other past jesus's from other religions.
Also, you may take a look at the earliest christian bible we have the codex sinaiticus. It has no ressurection or crusifiction on this 'first' edition of the bible. Theres a lot more stuff that was taken away and added. You should really compare the bible and the manuscripts.
Oh yes, the usual fear tactic, that most religions have to prevent people from doubting. This is what I used to believe, if I doubted, it was because the devil was trying to push me away from god. The usual good vs evil. Same way some news networks here try to push as well. A belief that either you are with us, or them, and if you are with them, you are wrong. What better way to keep a society from doubting. This is one of the main thing that I dislike. Religion stopping the spread of doubt, and therefore, progress. What better way to control a society.
So I am not hardened against the truth, I am actually seeking it. It is only those who know that they say that contain it, who are hardened against it.