In case you are curious, the proper phrase is "weigh the options" (as if weighing them on a scale in order to compare their weights).
Sure, conformists for conformism's sake, and non-conformists for non-comformism's sake. I agree that these aren't the only alternatives.
Okay, so it is clear that you are a philosophical person, in other words, someone who does not merely hold positions, but seeks to understand what the justification is for those positions. You consider issues not out of a desire to conform or to rebell, but to discover which positions are right and which are wrong.
So, what is it that leads you to conclude that a position is right or wrong? I'm talking about ethics now, but I suppose we can include a political position as an example.
Do you regard gay rights as an ethically right thing to support? If so, why? What is it about gay rights that makes it something an ethical person might decide to support?
eudaimonia,
Mark
Thank you for pointing my mistakes out i will try to do better
Thank you for thinking of me as a philosophical person that means a lot to me
Well funny you should say that about gay rights:
1. My first roommate in college is gay
2. My roommate right now is gay and she is my best friend in college
3. I am doing a 5 page single spaced paper on gay rights and their change in tactics to pass gay marriage as constitutional
So if you feel i might have a strong bias you may ask a different question.
So on the gay right support, i can the best way i can say it is if there is a thought in ones brain, such as gays deserve rights, then the question is could this be unethical, or lacking ethical views. So is being gay or gays having rights have any unethical standing. Like...
Some people against gays/gay rights say it goes against nature and that they can not continue life, but is this true or even wrong. Well if you believe in natural selection, then could have nature chosen them to be interested in their own sex then the other, choosing to naturally not to continue life which does happen. But now and days man as defied nature such as artificial insemination and abortion. And a gay guy still has sperm and a lesbian still has eggs, so they still have the potential to pass on life, but they are interested in people that do not have what they need to create a child, but they are still able to.
After all that is said and done, the real question is who is it hurting? Why and how is it hurting them?
If you ask me, a gay person is no less of a person than me or you. To me gay rights will be the next black rights and women's rights. Not saying one is of greater importance than the other but it is just and issue that due to the fact that the only reason that people think gay rights or being gay is wrong is mainly religion.
So even though religion frowns upon it, if they have reasoning why it is wrong, along with good facts or proof or something to support their argument, it is understandable, but if they it is because someone or something does not like that and gay people wont get in to heaven, then that is great to the person that believes that, but just cause one believes that, then they should live by it. Forcing a way of life on to others is unethical, because it who is it to say which is the best way of life, other than our own dogmatic belief that everything an individual does is right.
I hope this answered your question and i am sorry that i rambled on, but if i missed anything or said something you do not agree with then tell me, i am not one of those people that says they will never change their mind at all, that is a real close minded thing to say.