- Jan 30, 2004
- 23,298
- 2,832
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
Why do people assume that moderation is the same as ruling?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Let me thinkOption 2 is what I joined so guess which one I voted for.![]()
I voted for #2 but I don't want to go back to the old way totally.
1. I like it that nonChristians can post in the congregational forums without the thread having to be coded for it, BUT I strongly feel that only the congregational members should be allowed to debate in those forums, and that nonTrinitarian views should not be promoted.
2. I like how the overall site rules are shaping up now BUT in some ways the rule book is too thick. Different rules for different forums and all kinds of protocals for every little thing - it has not gotten simpler! it is getting more complicated by the day!
In other ways, the rule book is lacking. Language has gotten worse!
Too much is changed at the same time which has caused chaos. And the Wiki is so intimating that many members are hanging back. There are too many wikis - who can keep up and work reports and interactin the forums and get the moderators nominated, etc. It is VERY overwhelming.
3. I didn't like warnings/infractions BUT some folks are just trolls. Some folks will not behave and will continue to flame and harrass and chose to test the boundaries and overstep them.
4. I don't mind members reading the report threads, and have even appreciated input from members BUT some report threads have been flame fests so that there is even discussion in wiki about adding report buttons to posts in the report threads so that we would have to work reports on reports. Yikes!! And with the loss of staff, alot of reports are not being addressed. I really have an issue that member comments are anonymous! For true transparency, member names should be seen. There is concern about "protecting members" from retaliation - but staff are members too and are only volunteers, and apparently are fair game for retaliation.![]()
5. Voting for mods seems a good idea, but it can turn into a popularity contest And there are no controls as to WHO is voting. How many votes are duplicated thanks to sock puppets? Or folks who just joined a particular forum? And I have already seen the threats/harrassment/flames leveled at those who are mods now in report threads because they disagree with how a mod sees things in a report.
6. I do not have a problem with nonChristians as mods as there is a place for them. I still think the majority of mods need to be Nicene Christians (in terms of the Trinity) .
7. We do need to have the definition of Christian for the purposes of this forum to be Trinitarian as defined in the Nicene Creed. Changing that was throwing the baby out with the bath water.
8. I don't care that the CR is open for to all to view. However, there are situations that need confidentiality and a private space is need for that.
I agree with every point that FreeinChrist made.
that is what i was stumped over , guess it's just a question of name change "to reflect the current status"
mmmmmm,
something like welcome to CF -
Collectable-Forums
'Cumenical-forums
Chaos-Forums![]()
If option number one were to include removing the Christian title from this board altogether and making it a generic board, I'd have gone with number one. Making it a board with 'a strong Christian influence and outreach to Non Christians does not a generic messageboard make.
But since I do not believe that to be the case I went with option number 2. If it's going to be titled a Christian board, I think the rules should reflect that.
It's not tyrannical ruling. A good moderator, however, does exercise leadership.
Tim
No, it is an improper leading question, put together by a person who has predetermined what answer he wants. Erwin didn't word the poll--drstevej did.
Let us be frank here--he is, as usual, manipulating people to achieve his ends.
harsh words !
are you saying Erwin is being manipulated by a member who got banned and then un-banned in less than 24 hours by Erwin ?
Yes. Of course, moderators now being elected, much like in a representational democracy might mean that under the new system they are expected to be MORE like leaders than under the old system. I could extrapolate that from how the whole new setup has been implemented with moderators only for specific fora and things like that.Should they? I am not so sure.