Adoniram
Senior Member
I had to vote for Option 2. Although neither of the options appears to reflect the way CF was before the "change" was made.
Option 1 seeks to create a "safe social" site, albeit with a Christian influence. Safe from what? Perverts and predators? Sorry, but no site can guarantee that. Safe from attack upon one's beliefs? Not happening under the current format.
Option 2 seeks to create a Christians Only site where interaction with non-Christians, if desired, is extremely limited.
I wish the forum could go back to the way it was before Erwin made those changes. It seemed to me that a Christians Only section and an Open To Anyone section accommodated all sides concerned very well. Those who wished to further Christian unity could have discussions in the Christians Only section and those who wished for more of an outreach ministry had the option of posting their messages and replies in the Open section.
Under the current format, what I and many other Christians feared (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?p=36551189#post36551189) has indeed come to pass. Christian viewpoints everywhere on this forum are subject to attack from non-Christians.
Under the old format, if a Christian wanted to venture into the non-Christian section, knowing that he was likely to come under attack for his viewpoints, he was free to do so. But now, non-Christians are free to mount their attacks on Christian viewpoints in any thread. This is hardly a "safe" environment for Christians in a "supposed" Christian Forum.
There was nothing at all wrong with the forum the way it was before the changes. There should have been an Option 3 in the poll.
Option 3- Return the site to the way it was before Erwin's changes, with a Christians Only section and an Open to All section.
I wonder how many people would vote for that?
Option 1 seeks to create a "safe social" site, albeit with a Christian influence. Safe from what? Perverts and predators? Sorry, but no site can guarantee that. Safe from attack upon one's beliefs? Not happening under the current format.
Option 2 seeks to create a Christians Only site where interaction with non-Christians, if desired, is extremely limited.
I wish the forum could go back to the way it was before Erwin made those changes. It seemed to me that a Christians Only section and an Open To Anyone section accommodated all sides concerned very well. Those who wished to further Christian unity could have discussions in the Christians Only section and those who wished for more of an outreach ministry had the option of posting their messages and replies in the Open section.
Under the current format, what I and many other Christians feared (http://www.christianforums.com/showthread.php?p=36551189#post36551189) has indeed come to pass. Christian viewpoints everywhere on this forum are subject to attack from non-Christians.
Under the old format, if a Christian wanted to venture into the non-Christian section, knowing that he was likely to come under attack for his viewpoints, he was free to do so. But now, non-Christians are free to mount their attacks on Christian viewpoints in any thread. This is hardly a "safe" environment for Christians in a "supposed" Christian Forum.
There was nothing at all wrong with the forum the way it was before the changes. There should have been an Option 3 in the poll.
Option 3- Return the site to the way it was before Erwin's changes, with a Christians Only section and an Open to All section.
I wonder how many people would vote for that?
Upvote
0