Because you can't see the forest for the trees. In the real world case, it's the peculiar interaction of mass and spacetime that warps spacetime. The rubber sheet analogy uses gravity to represent mass warping spacetime. The point of the analogy is the effect the warping has on the movement of other bodies - a marble rolled on the sheet seems to be attracted to the heavy central mass, but that's just emerges from the curvature of spacetime, not any real force. That the analogy uses gravity to simulate this is irrelevant.
Because we don't treat it like an ether.
Which is utter rubbish. The atom is primarily controlled by the weak and strong nuclear forces; the EM force only governs electrons and molecules. The vibration of a caesium atom is determined by its nucleus, by quantum constants determined by the quark makeup of the nucleus. It is utterly unaffected by both the EM force and acceleration.
Utter unsubstantiated hogwash.
Except that classical theory is wrong. Light bends, but not enough. GR is needed to explain the extra bending observed. If you ignore GR, light bends more than it should. If you account for GR, this extra bending is precisely explained. GR doesn't just add bending, it adds the right amount of bending.
No one denies that the EM force can affect light, but it doesn't do it enough.
Indeed, which is why we can model the system with great precision, and find that it doesn't work. Classical models do not work, they don't bend light enough, they don't predict planetary movement well enough, and they are hilariously terrible at modelling atoms and smaller.
Nonsense. It is virtually impossible for a natural interstellar dust cloud to have exactly zero net spin. There will always be some net spin. This is the same reason for why black holes always have spin - you're just not gonna get zero net spin.
What exactly is your point here? GR never violates SR. SR is the degenerate case of flat spacetime, and Einstein said "What is spacetime wasn't flat?", and out popped GR. At what point do you think GR violates SR? And if it doesn't, what on Earth is your point?
You do realise that Einstein's own opinion about this theory means exactly zero, yes?
Says the person who thinks the only force at work in an atom is electromagnetism.
Says the man who thinks the weak interaction is anything other than electromagnetic.
Weak interaction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"The theory of the weak interaction is sometimes called
quantum flavordynamics (QFD), in analogy with the terms
QCD and
QED, but in practice the term is rarely used because the weak force is best understood in terms of
electro-weak theory"
So even your own scientists admit that the weak nuclear force is best understood in terms of the electro-weak theory. They just refuse to change the books or admit they are one and the same. So away goes one of your fundamental forces, and we are left with three. Electromagnetic, gravitational and strong force.
But as anyone who has ever studies science would know the strong force is not a fundamental force.
It was once believed that protons and neutrons were fundamental particles and a force was needed to explain how positive protons could stay together and not fly apart, so the strong force was postulated as this force. It was discovered in later years that they were not fundamental particles, but were composed of quarks controlled by the Color Charge force. The strong force was then considered a sub-field of the Color Charge field.
Strong interaction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Before the 1970s, physicists were uncertain about the binding mechanism of the atomic nucleus. It was known that the nucleus was composed of protons and neutrons and that protons possessed positive electric charge while neutrons were electrically neutral. However, these facts seemed to contradict one another. By physical understanding at that time, positive charges would repel one another and the nucleus should therefore fly apart. However, this was never observed. New physics was needed to explain this phenomenon.
A stronger attractive force was postulated to explain how the atomic nucleus was bound together despite the protons' mutual electromagnetic repulsion. This hypothesized force was called the
strong force, which was believed to be a fundamental force that acted on the nucleons (the protons and neutrons that make up the nucleus). Experiments suggested that this force bound protons and neutrons together with equal strength.
It was later discovered that protons and neutrons were not fundamental particles, but were made up of constituent particles called quarks. The strong attraction between nucleons was the side-effect of a more fundamental force that bound the quarks together in the protons and neutrons. The theory of quantum chromodynamics explains that quarks carry what is called a color charge, although it has no relation to visible color. Quarks with unlike color charge attract one another as a result of the
strong interaction, which is mediated by particles called gluons."
And as we know, quarks are nothing but charged particles.
Quark - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Quarks have
fractional electric charge values – either 1⁄3 or 2⁄3 times the
elementary charge, depending on flavor. Up, charm, and top quarks (collectively referred to as
up-type quarks) have a charge of +2⁄3, while down, strange, and bottom quarks (
down-type quarks) have −1⁄3. Antiquarks have the opposite charge to their corresponding quarks; up-type antiquarks have charges of −2⁄3 and down-type antiquarks have charges of +1⁄3. Since the electric charge of a
hadron is the sum of the charges of the constituent quarks, all hadrons have integer charges: the combination of three quarks (baryons), three antiquarks (antibaryons), or a quark and an antiquark (mesons) always results in integer charges.
[52] For example, the hadron constituents of atomic nuclei, neutrons and protons, have charges of 0 and +1 respectively; the neutron is composed of two down quarks and one up quark, and the proton of two up quarks and one down quark"
Elementary charge - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"The
elementary charge, usually denoted as
e, is the
electric charge carried by a single
proton, or equivalently, the
negation (opposite) of the electric charge carried by a single
electron.
[2] This elementary charge is a fundamental
physical constant."
So the electric charge or elementary charge is a physical constant of which quarks have fractional charges thereof. Of course you like to call it color charge, although it has no relation to color and is merely the spin, i.e. movement of charged particles interacting with one another.
As for Gluons:
Gluon - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Gluons ( /ˈɡluːɒnz/; from English
glue) are elementary particles that act as the exchange particles (or gauge bosons) for the strong force between quarks, analogous to the exchange of photons in the electromagnetic force between two charged particles.
Since quarks make up the baryons and the mesons, and the strong interaction takes place between baryons and mesons, one could say that the color force is the source of the strong interaction, or that the strong interaction is like a residual color force that extends beyond the baryons, for example when protons and neutrons are bound together in a nucleus."
So "one could say that the color force is the source of the strong interaction," and to be considered a fundamental force " In particle physics,
fundamental interactions (sometimes called
interactive forces or
fundamental forces) are the ways that elementary particles interact with one another. An interaction is fundamental when it cannot be described in terms of other interactions."
Fundamental interaction - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
It was first wrongly asserted that the protons and neutrons were fundamental particles and governed by the strong force, then when Color Charge was found, the strong force became a sub-filed of this force. In effect the strong force can know be described in terms of the Color Charge, so it no longer can claim fundamental force status. Yet they to this day call it a fundamental force, when in reality it is the color charge of the fundamental particles (quarks) that governs the atom.
So bye, bye to the strong force. And we are left with two, electromagnetic and gravitational. Since we to this day have no idea at all as to what causes gravity, it could very well be nothing more than the balanced electric and magnetic forces around us, since as we already learned the EM force is responsible for every other interaction around us that we observe except gravity. Once again, even your own scientists admit to this.
Electromagnetism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"The electromagnetic force is the interaction responsible for almost all the phenomena encountered in daily life, with the exception of gravity."
But since gravity according to GR is NOT a force, then in reality we are left with just one fundamental force, electromagnetism. And your bent spacetime becomes just another Fairie Dust entity needed to explain the refusal to accept the fact that you treat Plasma as nothing but ordinary matter (solids, liquids and gasses - matter in which the electric and magnetic forces are balanced) when scientists themselves say it behave quite unlike them and is a distinct state of matter.
You can't even abide by your own definition of what Plasma is, but treat it no differently than a "hot gas" of which it behaves quite unlike and then constantly have to invent Fairie Dust as a supernatural gap filler to fudge the math. Try practicing science sometimes and actually listening to experimental results and you might find your need for Fairie Dust becomes nil.
But then your psuedoscientists called astronomers wouldn't be able to obtain billions of dollars in funding looking for nothing. As long as they continue to ignore Plasma in the universe they can continue to postulate their Fairie Dust entities and continue to con the American people out of their hard earned tax dollars.
All to support their fancy cars, big houses and Symposiums on Dark Matter, just so we can be told they have found absolutely nothing, for the 12th time.
It is a never-ending story. But the search must go on because the next round of funding is needed to support their lifestyle. You are a dupe, a pawn in the greatest hoax ever perpetuated. Wake up and demand accountability.
A Neverending Story - Cosmologists Find The Nothing!!
How many times must we find nothing, while they laud a negative result as a success?
And how are those gravity waves going?
http://www.thunderbolts.info/thunde...mith_au08/ligo_successfully_finds_nothing.htm
