Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The views regarding Holy Communion vary widely between Protestant denominations. Lutherans and Anglicans have very different views from Baptists.Am I?
Mmm, I see what you mean. So if I’ve got this right, when I said in an earlier post that some Protestants (such as Lutherans and some Anglicans) do believe in the Real Presence, you’re saying I had a fair point? Golly...The views regarding Holy Communion vary widely between Protestant denominations. Lutherans and Anglicans have very different views from Baptists.
Because we are taught both inside the Catholic Churches and Sunday School that Protestants have a different understanding of the "Lord's Supper."
The whole idea is that Catholics actually believe that the bread and wine become the actual true Body and Blood of Christ. MOST Protestants do not have the same belief.
I was told by Catholics that Protestants dont actually partake of the real Lords supper. If this is true then doesnt that mean that protestants are dead, according to John 6:53?
I started this thread as a spin off thread from another thread i have going. As i was discussing the Lords supper, I was told by Catholics that Protestants dont actually partake of the real Lords supper. If this is true then doesnt that mean that protestants are dead, according to John 6:53?
John 6:53 New King James Version (NKJV)
53 Then Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you.
If a friend asked you to remember him, would you frame a photograph of his bloody body at an accident scene, and stare at it? People (C or P) that are hooked up on that may just be missing everything Jesus lived for.
Its a simple question.With respect, I am entitled to challenge relevant dogmatic statements made on the thread
My comment was valid 3/ in my list below - some seem surprised that any version of eucharist will not do. I urge them to study early church. Few protestant churches can even mount a relevant argument they have a valid eucharist in the terms the apostolic succession defined.
The answer to the bigger question is complex. Not yes/no
Both aquinas and augustine have clarified this at considerable length, as have magisterial statements been made as well.
To summarise a long theological debate.
Dogma is...
1/ Baptism is necessary
2/ To be effective a eucharist needs to be valid - the point I addressed
3/ The eucharist can be as effective in condemning as it is in saving. "eat and drink judgement" - it is not enough just to partake.
4/ That the reason eucharist is centre of our faith is that Jesus is centre of our faith, and Jesus truly present in the eucharist.
5/ Knowing that and failing to act on it or indeed profaning it is therefore a serious sin and sin does endanger salvation
6/ Not being aware of it does not carry the risk that knowingly avoiding it does. But nobody on this thread can say they "did not know" if they fail to take this opportuity to see what the fathers say.
7/ In the end it is an ordinance of our Lord that you must do so. And since none of us merit salvation, it is therefore by Grace alone we are saved, disobeying a direct ordinance , indeed disobeying a direct call by Christ to meet him in the eucharist clearly demonstrates lack of faith. And it is grace through formed faith which therefore requires the best attempt you can muster to meet the ordinances.
8/ But it is by grace we are saved , the decision is by Christ alone. But clearly failing to do what he asks you to do in any regard (eg sheep and goats) can have CONSEQUENCES!.
9/He cannot make it clearer. If you eat my body, drink my blood you will have eternal life. If you do not you have no life in you. Why would you ignore such a statement?
So in summary you definitely harm your chances. Badly.
10/ Let me turn the question on its head.
If you are given an invitation to meet Christ, in heaven meets earth. Why as a christian would you not accept the invitiation? and what does it say of the formation of your faith if you do not?
We accept the invitation, as often as we can.
I agree.I see two issues here, both of which are based upon dividing words supplied by Men, not God.
The first of these is "Transubstantiation" a word invented early in the church's history as one denomination took over the others through threat of death for alleged "Heresy."
It means there is a crossing over of a substance to become a different substance; i.e., bread and wine BECOME (transubstantiation) body and blood of the Christ.
The second issue is based upon the occasion in which the Apostle Paul castigated the church for dividing into denominations.
"Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment.
11 For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.
12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.
13 Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?"[I Cor 1:10-13]
I am of Rome; I am of John the Baptiser; I am of Martin Luther; I am of the church of Christ;"
Paul made no exception for any of them. He did not say "Everyone except those who are of_____ are wrong!" Nope! He said all are wrong for excluding ANY brother over dividing issues.
So anyone who excludes others for questioning a doctrine, or a tradition, or an issue not expressly stated in scripture, is as wrong as those corrected by Paul for dividing the body of Christ.
As for the issue of communion, some even divide over whether it is limited to Sunday; others insist the Sabbath (Saturday) is the exclusive assignment; still others insist it can be taken "As oft" as desired, even daily if practiced consistently.
Christ does NOT divide brethren over issues which may have different interpretations within the pages of scripture itself. Man-made doctrines and traditions have no place in the decision making process.
We answer to a common redeemer, not to self-appointed church leaders or favorite preachers.
You cannot cherry pick verses. You are proof texting again.
It is clearly not symbolic. How can you profane a symbol? Why were they horrified .. because he used the word that means "gnaw" as of flesh, not consume. Why did the romans think they were cannibals? If they did not to quote ignatius "profess the eucharist to be the body and blood of our lord" "real flesh" as Justin martyr said.
You cannot interpret scripture without authority and tradition handed by the apostles. It is why protestants schism on every matter including eucharist.
The entire church, believed it was the "flesh of jesus"until renegades in the reformation, and most of it still does. Athough there is a philosophical distinction between us and orthodox.
The bible also makes it quite clear you can profane the eucharist and "eat and drink judgement" on yourself. How so if itis just a symbol. So your reference to Judas disregards scripture.
One day, people like you might just study early fathers, and find out what the apostles taught the early church! It is clear what John taught...you see it in ignatius.
I started this thread as a spin off thread from another thread i have going. As i was discussing the Lords supper, I was told by Catholics that Protestants dont actually partake of the real Lords supper. If this is true then doesnt that mean that protestants are dead, according to John 6:53?
John 6:53 New King James Version (NKJV)
53 Then Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you.
Absolutely not! Because Jesus sacrificed himself on the cross to cover all sins with his blood. All that is required is to put your trust and faith in JesusI started this thread as a spin off thread from another thread i have going. As i was discussing the Lords supper, I was told by Catholics that Protestants dont actually partake of the real Lords supper. If this is true then doesnt that mean that protestants are dead, according to John 6:53?
John 6:53 New King James Version (NKJV)
53 Then Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you.
And if he mass is a high mass. But Fr. Foley could get through a Sunday or Saturday evening mass in 33 minutes flat.That would depend on which mass. Sunday masses seem to last an hour. Weekday masses last 30 minutes. That is how the books present the matter.
As Jesus told us to do: "and when He had given thanks, He broke it and said, 'Take, eat: this is My body which is broken for you; do this in remembrance of Me'. In the same manner he also took the cup after supper, saying, 'This cup is the new covenant in My blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me."At masses the old testament is read then a psalm then a reading from Paul's letters or some other part of the new testament and finally a reading from the gospel. After the readings comes a homily that is usually centred on the gospel reading. After the homily there are prayers and then the Holy Eucharist. That is what Catholic books say and what is in a Catholic Missal. Have a look and see for yourself that reading scripture before receiving communion is the norm.