Facts are facts, America. We should care about getting things right. Yet standards of who gets fact-checked, how often + why are unclear.
This is where false equivalency+bias creeps in, allowing climate deniers to be put on par w/scientists, for example.
https://www.salon.com/2018/12/09/fact-check-false-equivalence-washington-post-rates-ocasio-cortez-as-bad-as-trump/ …
__________
Or why did
@washingtonpost give my confusing tweet on military accounting offsets the same “Pinocchios” as Trump’s flat denial of how many Americans died in Puerto Rico?
These are legitimate questions not intended to attack. Who makes these decisions? How? Is there a rubric?
_________________
Another question for
@politifact: some officials’ statements (ex. Andrew Cuomo) get rated “true” frequently.
I say true things all the time - I’d hope most do. When does Politifact choose to rate true statements?
Is there a guide? I’d be happy to repost if there is.