• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Anti-universalism hostility

Status
Not open for further replies.

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,338
7,348
California
✟596,233.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Just wondering. If universalists believe that all are or are going to be saved, then how do they handle one of many verses which say just the opposite in the Christian Bible like, "13 “Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. 14 But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it," spoken by JESUS Himself? Bible Gateway passage: Matthew 7:13-14 - New International Version
From the voice heard in the video in the OP - Richard Rohr:

"In his book, Inventing Hell, Jon Sweeney points out that our Christian notion of hell largely comes from several unfortunate metaphors in Matthew’s Gospel. Hell is not found in the Pentateuch, the first five books of the Bible. It’s not found in the Gospel of John or in Paul’s letters. The words Sheol and Gehenna are used in Matthew, but they have nothing to do with our later medieval notion of eternal punishment. Sheol is simply the place of the dead, a sort of limbo place where humans await the final judgment when God will finally win. As Paul says in 1 Corinthians, in the end “God will be all in all” (15:28). Gehenna was both the garbage dump outside of Jerusalem—the Valley of Hinnom—and an early Jewish metaphor for evil (Isaiah 66:24). The idea of hell as we most commonly view it came much more from Dante’s Divine Comedy than the Bible. Dante’s Purgatorio and Inferno are brilliant Italian poetry, but horrible Christian theology. Dante’s view of God is largely nonbiblical; however, there are some great insights in the Paradiso." ~ A Toxic Image of God — Center for Action and Contemplation

Personally, what I believe Jesus and His followers were warning against wasn't an eternal damnation of hell.....but, instead, the coming destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. People had the choice of believing the Zealots of Jesus' day.....or Jesus and His disciples when they gave these instructions and signs to look for (this was spoken to a specific audience - those living in the days of Jesus):

Luke 21:20 ~ "But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then recognize that her desolation is near"

Luke 19:43-44 ~ For the days will come upon you when your enemies will barricade you and surround you and hem you in on every side. They will crush you into the ground, and your children with you. Your enemies will not leave a single stone in place, because you did not recognize it when God visited you.”

Matthew 24:15-17 ~ So when you see standing in the holy place 'the abomination of desolation,' described by the prophet Daniel (let the reader understand), then those in Judea, let them flee to the mountains; the one on the housetop, do not let him come down to take anything out of his house;
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: FineLinen
Upvote 0

FineLinen

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 15, 2003
12,119
6,397
83
The Kingdom of His dear Son
✟573,542.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Your point presupposes that God intended Universalism all along but failed to get it done. But that's begging the question. God could will for all to be saved, but only for those who meet his conditions to achieve it. In that case, he didn't fail.

Dear Gregorikos: God intended all along to end all where it began, in Him as the Source, Guide & Goal of the all!

Is God a Failure?

Now that’s a pretty poignant question. Or is it an insinuation? An inference? Or implication? Or is it truth, as many would have you believe? Have you ever heard a sermon by that title? I doubt if you have. But I’m certain you have heard many a sermon which has been riddled with such implications.

Allow me to rephrase the question: Have you ever heard a sermon stating that if you don’t accept Jesus, you’ll burn forever in hell? Ah, I knew I’d touch a raw nerve. You have, haven’t you? If you heard that God is going to lose so much as one individual to the devil forever, then God is a failure.

If you have heard that the heathen (who have never had an opportunity to hear of Jesus) will be tormented forever for not believing in Him, then you’ve heard that God is a failure. If you’ve heard that man’s puny will can withstand the omnipotent will of God, and that man’s will can paralyze God’s will, then you have heard that God is a failure.

If you’ve heard that the Adversary outsmarted God in the garden of Eden, if you’ve heard that God did not want Adam and Eve to eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, then you’ve heard that God is a failure.

If you’ve ever heard anyone affirm that God will lose 95% of His created beings that He’s placed on planet earth, and will torment them forever, then you’ve clearly heard that God is a failure.

If the Good Shepherd is not willing that any should perish, and yet gets weary and gives up before He finds the last sheep that’s lost, then you know that God is a failure.

If no one can come to Jesus except the Father draws him, and if the Father - eventually - does not draw every single person, then God is a failure.

What is the response of your heart to the poised question: Is God a failure? Ah, my heart says, “Nay, a billion nays.” My heart has fallen in love with a God who does all things perfectly, and one day all will be made plain, and in the end He will become ‘All in All’ and for that day my heart does wait and meanwhile I rejoice and endure because I see Him, the invisible One.

By faith I see a Master Plan for the ages and beyond, and I know I am part of that plan, and for this I whisper, “Thank you, Jesus.” I sing a song to my Beloved, Hallelujah!

In Love with Him

- Eleanor Garrod-
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,264
✟584,012.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
You know as well as I do that there are many passages for and against. You seem to think the scriptures are abundantly clear on the subject. I disagree, as I stated. As I said, I am agnostic concerning the amount of people who will eternally populate hell, if there be any. I don't declare universalism to be true or false, because I don't think it is as clear as you do. I don't condemn you for holding that there is a number that will be condemned forever. Do you condemn me?
It is appropriate to say that one hopes for something like Universalism (what about hell for only a very few people, for example?)...or that we are not given to know how God will judge in every person's case.

However, for those people who flatly assert that Universal Salvation is God's way, that view is not based in Scripture.

There are NOT "many passages for and against." There are a few, perhaps a half-dozen, which might suggest Universal Salvation and, against that, there are many, many which are pointedly against such a belief.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Aussie Pete

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 14, 2019
9,088
8,305
Frankston
Visit site
✟775,231.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Divorced
In this short video, David Bentley Hart suggests that the emotionally-driven objection of many Christians to universal salvation/ restorationism is motivated by a childish view that 'For me to win, someone has to lose'. This is a sin that we all suffer from time to time. But is God's grace not higher than that?

Any objection to a doctrine must have only one basis. And that basis is that the doctrine can be shown to be unbiblical. People need to understand that those who refuse to accept God's gift of His Son will suffer the consequences. I wish UR was true. The problem is that it avoids the real issue.

God has one judgement initially. Is the person before Him alive or dead? Those who are born again are alive in Christ. Those who are not are spiritually dead. Emotion does not enter into it.
 
Upvote 0

Aussie Pete

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 14, 2019
9,088
8,305
Frankston
Visit site
✟775,231.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Divorced
Charlie, just the man DBH was thinking of! Welcome in my man. But what if restricting the mercy and grace of God to anything less than the perfect and absolute is a sin, Charlie?

The gospel of good news for all doesn't suddenly turn into terrible news for many. Jesus didn't die in vain.
You want to read your Bible. "…15For we are to God the sweet aroma of Christ among those who are being saved and those who are perishing. 16To the one, we are an odour of death and demise; to the other, a fragrance that brings life."

Offering false hope to people is wrong. Many people reject God's mercy and grace. There are consequences.
 
Upvote 0

public hermit

social troglodyte
Site Supporter
Aug 20, 2019
12,670
13,517
East Coast
✟1,063,529.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
It is appropriate to say that one hopes for something like Universalism (would hell for a very few by impossible, for example?)...or that we are not given to know how God will judge in every person's case.

However, for those people who flatly assert that Universal Salvation is God's way, that view is not based in Scripture.

I do hope for something like Universalism. I don't assert it as fact. I guess that's clear enough from my post. Obviously, those who flatly assert Universalism are going to argue it is based in scripture.

There are NOT "many passages for and against."

Again, it depends on who is counting. Maybe I should have stated it differently like "plenty" or "more than one might expect" or some such. I am sure there are those here who would defend the use of "many." As for myself, I think it is an issue that shouldn't be cast aside as unimportant or an aberration. But, maybe that's only because I have questions.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,264
✟584,012.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I do hope for something like Universalism. I don't assert it as fact. I guess that's clear enough from my post. Obviously, those who flatly assert Universalism are going to argue it is based in scripture...

Again, it depends on who is counting. Maybe I should have stated it differently like "plenty" or "more than one might expect" or some such. I am sure there are those here who would defend the use of "many."

The fact remains, however, and should be acknowledged, that there are relatively few verses that suggest Universalism whereas there are many that seem inescapably to be teaching that not everyone will be saved.

If a person hopes or wants to say that Universalism is true, that's his own opinion or hope and it doesn't bother me at all. If, however, he claims Scripture in order to support his view--as should be done--then the claim fails, since Scripture, if taken in total, does not support the idea.
 
Upvote 0

Chris V++

Associate Member
Site Supporter
Mar 16, 2018
1,719
1,511
Dela Where?
Visit site
✟875,834.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
It's common for people to think that the "all roads lead to heaven" idea is "universalism", but actually what you're describing is "pluralism".

Christian universalism teaches that salvation is only in Christ, and hell is real, and that all will eventually believe in Christ. So all are saved by believing in Christ only. The difference is that all will eventually believe in Christ, and hell is a place of temporal punishment (no one knows how long that would be) that may facilitate that restoration process.

I come in defense of it because these details matter. I think in matters of debate, the more we know of the facts and the definitions, the more effective those debates will be.

My understanding of the Orthodox belief is that, since Christ descended and preached to lost souls before the resurrection, the unsaved but departed even in the present age have a chance to repent before the final judgement, so there is still hope even after death. However not all will repent is this life nor the next. I think they describe hell as being unfit to endure God's burning radiant light. Hell for those souls is being in the very presence of God.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BroRoyVa79
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,128
6,153
EST
✟1,151,696.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
<MK>From the voice heard in the video in the OP - Richard Rohr:
"In his book, Inventing Hell, Jon Sweeney points out that our Christian notion of hell largely comes from several unfortunate metaphors in Matthew’s Gospel. Hell is not found in the Pentateuch, the first five books of the Bible. It’s not found in the Gospel of John or in Paul’s letters. The words Sheol and Gehenna are used in Matthew, but they have nothing to do with our later medieval notion of eternal punishment. Sheol is simply the place of the dead, a sort of limbo place where humans await the final judgment when God will finally win. As Paul says in 1 Corinthians, in the end “God will be all in all” (15:28). Gehenna was both the garbage dump outside of Jerusalem—the Valley of Hinnom—and an early Jewish metaphor for evil (Isaiah 66:24). The idea of hell as we most commonly view it came much more from Dante’s Divine Comedy than the Bible. Dante’s Purgatorio and Inferno are brilliant Italian poetry, but horrible Christian theology. Dante’s view of God is largely nonbiblical; however, there are some great insights in the Paradiso." ~ A Toxic Image of God — Center for Action and Contemplation
Personally, what I believe Jesus and His followers were warning against wasn't an eternal damnation of hell.....but, instead, the coming destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. People had the choice of believing the Zealots of Jesus' day.....or Jesus and His disciples when they gave these instructions and signs to look for (this was spoken to a specific audience - those living in the days of Jesus):
Luke 21:20 ~ "But when you see Jerusalem surrounded by armies, then recognize that her desolation is near"
Luke 19:43-44 ~ For the days will come upon you when your enemies will barricade you and surround you and hem you in on every side. They will crush you into the ground, and your children with you. Your enemies will not leave a single stone in place, because you did not recognize it when God visited you.”
Matthew 24:15-17
~ So when you see standing in the holy place 'the abomination of desolation,' described by the prophet Daniel (let the reader understand), then those in Judea, let them flee to the mountains; the one on the housetop, do not let him come down to take anything out of his house;<MK>
I realize that you are not the author of this but I want to address the blatantly false information the author provided. Everything highlighted in red in your post is false.
.....I joined this forum almost exactly 20 years ago. After hearing the same old story many times I decided to research the topic of hell.
…..According to three irrefutable Jewish sources; the Jewish Encyclopedia, Encyclopedia Judaica and the Talmud, quoted below, among the Jews in Israel before and during the time of Jesus there was a belief in a place of everlasting torment of the wicked and they called it both sheol and gehinnom, hades and gehenna in the NT.
…..There were different groups within Judaism; Sadducees, Pharisees, Essenes etc. and there were different beliefs about resurrection, hell etc. That there were differing beliefs does not rebut, refute, change or disprove anything in this post.
Jewish Encyclopedia, Gehenna
The place where children were sacrificed to the god Moloch … in the "valley of the son of Hinnom," to the south of Jerusalem (Josh. xv. 8, passim; II Kings xxiii. 10; Jer. ii. 23; vii. 31-32; xix. 6, 13-14). … the valley was deemed to be accursed, and "Gehenna" therefore soon became a figurative equivalent for "hell." Hell, like paradise, was created by God (Sotah 22a);[“Soon” in this verse would be about 700 BC +/-]
[Note, this is according to the ancient Jews, long before the Christian era, NOT supposed bias of Christian translators. DA]
(I)n general …sinners go to hell immediately after their death. The famous teacher Johanan b. Zakkai wept before his death because he did not know whether he would go to paradise or to hell (Ber. 28b). The pious go to paradise, and sinners to hell(B.M. 83b).
But as regards the heretics, etc., and Jeroboam, Nebat's son,
hell shall pass away, but they shall not pass away" (R. H. 17a; comp. Shab. 33b). All that descend into Gehenna shall come up again, with the exception of three classes of men: those who have committed adultery, or shamed their neighbors, or vilified them (B. M. 58b).[/i]
… heretics and the Roman oppressors go to Gehenna, and the same fate awaits the Persians, the oppressors of the Babylonian Jews (Ber. 8b).
When Nebuchadnezzar descended into hell, [שאול/Sheol] all its inhabitants were afraid that he was coming to rule over them (Shab. 149a; comp. Isa. xiv. 9-10). The Book of Enoch [x. 6, xci. 9, etal] also says that it is chiefly the heathen who are to be cast into the fiery pool on the Day of Judgment (x. 6, xci. 9, et al). "The Lord, the Almighty, will punish them on the Day of Judgment by putting fire and worms into their flesh, so that they cry out with pain unto all eternity" (Judith xvi. 17). The sinners in Gehenna will be filled with pain when God puts back the souls into the dead bodies on the Day of Judgment, according toIsa. xxxiii. 11 (Sanh. 108b).
Link:
Jewish Encyclopedia Online
Note, scripture references are highlighted in blue.
= = = = = = = = = =
Encyclopedia Judaica:
Gehinnom (Heb.
גֵּי בֶן־הִנֹּם, גֵּי בְנֵי הִנֹּם, גֵּיא בֶן־הִנֹּם, גֵּיא הִנֹּם; Gr. Γέεννα; "Valley of Ben-Hinnom, Valley of [the Son (s) of] Hinnom," Gehenna), a valley south of Jerusalem on one of the borders between the territories of Judah and Benjamin, between the Valley of *Rephaim and *En-Rogel (Josh. 15:8; 18:16). It is identified with Wadi er-Rababi.…..During the time of the Monarchy, Gehinnom, at a place called Topheth, was the site of a cult which involved the burning of children (II Kings 23:10; Jer. 7:31; 32:35 et al.; ). Jeremiah repeatedly condemned this cult and predicted that on its account Topheth and the Valley of the Son of Hinnom would be called the Valley of the "Slaughter" (Jer. 19:5–6).In Judaism the name Gehinnom is generally used as an appellation of the place of torment reserved for the wicked after death. The New Testament used the Greek form Gehenna in the same sense.
Gehinnom
= = = = = = = = = = Talmud -Tractate Rosh Hashanah Chapter 1.

The school of Hillel says: . . . but as for Minim, [followers of Jesus] informers and disbelievers, who deny the Torah, or Resurrection, or separate themselves from the congregation, or who inspire their fellowmen with dread of them, or who sin and cause others to sin, as did Jeroboam the son of Nebat and his followers, they all descend to Gehenna, and are judged there from generation to generation, as it is said [Isa. lxvi. 24]: "And they shall go forth and look upon the carcases of the men who have transgressed against Me; for their worm shall not die, neither shall their fire be quenched." Even when Gehenna will be destroyed, they will not be consumed, as it is written[Psalms, xlix. 15]: "And their forms wasteth away in the nether world," which the sages comment upon to mean that their forms shall endure even when the grave is no more. Concerning them Hannah says [I Sam. ii. 10]: "The adversaries of the Lord shall be broken to pieces."
Link: Tract Rosh Hashana: Chapter I.
When Jesus taught e.g.,
• “Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels:” Matthew 25:41
• "
these shall go away into eternal punishment, Matthew 25:46"
• "
the fire of hell where the fire is not quenched and the worm does not die, 3X Mark 9:43-48"
• "
cast into a fiery furnace where there will be wailing and gnashing of teeth,” Matthew 13:42, Matthew 13:50
• “
But whoso shall offend one of these little ones which believe in me, it were better for him that a millstone were hanged about his neck, and that he were drowned in the depth of the sea.” Matthew 18:6
• “
And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.” Matthew 7:23
• “
woe unto that man by whom the Son of man is betrayed! it had been good for that man if he had not been born. ” Matthew 26:24
• “But I say unto you, that it shall be more tolerable in that day for Sodom, than for that city.” Luke 10:12
…..These teachings tacitly reaffirmed and sanctioned a then existing significant Jewish view of eternal hell, outlined above. In Matt. 18:6, 26:24 and Luk 10:12, see above, Jesus teaches that there is a punishment worse than death or nonexistence.
…..A punishment worse than death without mercy is also mentioned in Hebrews 10:28-31.
Heb 10:28 He that despised Moses' law died without mercy under two or three witnesses:
29 Of
how much sorer punishment, suppose ye, shall he be thought worthy, who hath trodden under foot the Son of God, and hath counted the blood of the covenant, wherewith he was sanctified, an unholy thing, and hath done despite unto the Spirit of grace?
30 For we know him that hath said,
Vengeance belongeth unto me, I will recompense, saith the Lord. And again, The Lord shall judge his people.
31
It is a fearful thing to fall into the hands of the living God.
…..Jesus is quoted as using the word death 17 times in the gospels, if He wanted to say eternal death in Matt 25:46, that is what He would have said but He didn’t, He said “eternal punishment.” The Sadducees did not believe in the resurrection, they knew that everybody died; rich, poor, young, old, good, bad, men, women, children, infants and knew that often it had nothing to do with punishment and was permanent. When Jesus taught “eternal punishment” they would not have understood it as merely death, it would have meant something worse to them.
…..Concerning “punishment” one early church father wrote,
“‘Then these reap no advantage from their punishment, as it seems: moreover, I would say that they are not punished unless they are conscious of the punishment.” Justin Martyr [A.D. 110-165.] Dialogue with Trypho Chapter 4
…..Jesus undoubtedly knew what the Jews, believed about hell. If the Jews were wrong, why didn’t Jesus tell them there was no hell, no eternal punishment etc? Why would Jesus teach “eternal punishment,” etc. to Jews who believed, "The Lord, the Almighty, will punish them on the Day of Judgment by putting fire and worms into their flesh, so that they cry out with pain unto all eternity," which would only encourage and reinforce their beliefs?
I will address Ge hinnom-Gehenna in the next post.

 
  • Winner
Reactions: BroRoyVa79
Upvote 0

Der Alte

This is me about 1 yr. old. when FDR was president
Site Supporter
Aug 21, 2003
29,128
6,153
EST
✟1,151,696.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The traditional explanation that a burning rubbish heap in the Valley of Hinnom south of Jerusalem gave rise to the idea of a fiery Gehenna of judgment is attributed to Rabbi David Kimhi's commentary on Psalm 27:13 (ca. A.D. 1200). He maintained that in this loathsome valley fires were kept burning perpetually to consume the filth and cadavers thrown into it. However, Strack and Billerbeck state that there is neither archaeological nor literary evidence in support of this claim, in either the earlier intertestamental or the later rabbinic sources (Hermann L. Strack and Paul Billerbeck, Kommentar zum Neuen Testament aus Talmud and Midrasch, 5 vols. [Munich: Beck, 1922-56], 4:2:1030). Also a more recent author holds a similar view (Lloyd R. Bailey, "Gehenna: The Topography of Hell," Biblical Archeologist 49 [1986]: 189.
Source, Bibliotheca Sacra / July–September 1992
Scharen: Gehenna in the Synoptics Pt. 1
/…..Note there is no “archaeological nor literary evidence in support of this claim, [that Gehenna was ever used as a garbage dump] in either the earlier intertestamental or the later rabbinic sources” If Gehenna was ever used as a garbage dump there should be broken pottery, tools, utensils, bones, etc. but there is no such evidence.
“Gehenna is presented as diametrically opposed to ‘life’: it is better to enter life than to go to Gehenna. . .It is common practice, both in scholarly and less technical works, to associate the description of Gehenna with the supposedly contemporary garbage dump in the valley of Hinnom. This association often leads scholars to emphasize the destructive aspects of the judgment here depicted: fire burns until the object is completely consumed. Two particular problems may be noted in connection with this approach. First, there is no convincing evidence in the primary sources for the existence of a fiery rubbish dump in this location (in any case, a thorough investigation would be appreciated). Secondly, the significant background to this passage more probably lies in Jesus’ allusion to Isaiah 66:24.”
(“The Duration of Divine Judgment in the New Testament” in The Reader Must Understand edited by K. Brower and M. W. Ellion, p. 223, emphasis mine)
G. R. Beasley-Murray in Jesus and the Kingdom of God:
“Ge-Hinnom (Aramaic Ge-hinnam, hence the Greek Geenna), ‘The Valley of Hinnom,’ lay south of Jerusalem, immediately outside its walls. The notion, still referred to by some commentators, that the city’s rubbish was burned in this valley, has no further basis than a statement by the Jewish scholar Kimchi (sic) made about A.D. 1200; it is not attested in any ancient source.” (p. 376n.92)
The Burning Garbage Dump of Gehenna is a myth - Archaeology, Biblical History & Textual Criticism

Abstract
Miqweh of Second Temple Period. ......Jerusalem City-Dump in the Late Second Temple Period, ZDPV, 119/1 (2003),
The chance discovery of an Early Roman city dump (1st century CE) in Jerusalem has yielded for the first time ever quantitative data on garbage components that introduce us to the mundane daily life Jerusalemites led and the kind of animals that were featured in their diet. Most of the garbage consists of pottery shards, all common tableware, while prestige objects are entirely absent. Other significant garbage components include numerous fragments of cooking ovens, wall plaster, animal bones and plant remains. Of the pottery vessels, cooking pots are the most abundant type. Most of the refuse turns out to be “household garbage” originating in the domestic areas of the city, while large numbers of cooking pots may point to the presence of pilgrims. Significantly, the faunal assemblage, which is dominated by kosher species and the clear absence of pigs, set Jerusalem during its peak historical period apart from all other contemporaneous Roman urban centers.
...
Excavations near the Temple Mount and within the residential areas have already shown that no waste had accumulated there (Reich and Billig 2000), and thus waste must have been removed, most likely in an organized manner. Recently, the contemporaneous city-dump was identified on the eastern slope of the south-eastern hill of Jerusalem in the form of a thick mantle (up to 10 m, 200,000 m3 ) (Reich and Shukron 2003). The dump is located roughly 100 m outside and south-east of the Temple Mount on the eastern slope of the Kidron Valley (fig. 1), and extends at least 400 m and is 50–70 m wide. Large amounts of pottery and coins date the dump to the Early Roman period (the 1st century BCE and the 1st century CE up to the destruction of the city by the Romans in 70 CE). A preliminary study of the garbage (Bouchnik, Bar-Oz and Reich 2004; Bouchnik et al. 2005) showed the presence of animal bones, and a detailed multidisciplinary joint study of the debris was carried out.
https://www.researchgate.net/public...udy_of_the_City-Dump_of_Early_Roman_Jerusalem



 
  • Winner
Reactions: BroRoyVa79
Upvote 0

Gregorikos

Ordinary Mystic
Dec 31, 2019
1,103
893
Louisville, Kentucky
Visit site
✟130,827.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Dear Gregorikos: God intended all along to end all where it began, in Him as the Source, Guide & Goal of the all!

Is God a Failure?

Now that’s a pretty poignant question. Or is it an insinuation? An inference? Or implication? Or is it truth, as many would have you believe? Have you ever heard a sermon by that title? I doubt if you have. But I’m certain you have heard many a sermon which has been riddled with such implications.

Allow me to rephrase the question: Have you ever heard a sermon stating that if you don’t accept Jesus, you’ll burn forever in hell? Ah, I knew I’d touch a raw nerve. You have, haven’t you? If you heard that God is going to lose so much as one individual to the devil forever, then God is a failure.

If you have heard that the heathen (who have never had an opportunity to hear of Jesus) will be tormented forever for not believing in Him, then you’ve heard that God is a failure. If you’ve heard that man’s puny will can withstand the omnipotent will of God, and that man’s will can paralyze God’s will, then you have heard that God is a failure.

If you’ve heard that the Adversary outsmarted God in the garden of Eden, if you’ve heard that God did not want Adam and Eve to eat of the tree of knowledge of good and evil, then you’ve heard that God is a failure.

If you’ve ever heard anyone affirm that God will lose 95% of His created beings that He’s placed on planet earth, and will torment them forever, then you’ve clearly heard that God is a failure.

If the Good Shepherd is not willing that any should perish, and yet gets weary and gives up before He finds the last sheep that’s lost, then you know that God is a failure.

If no one can come to Jesus except the Father draws him, and if the Father - eventually - does not draw every single person, then God is a failure.

What is the response of your heart to the poised question: Is God a failure? Ah, my heart says, “Nay, a billion nays.” My heart has fallen in love with a God who does all things perfectly, and one day all will be made plain, and in the end He will become ‘All in All’ and for that day my heart does wait and meanwhile I rejoice and endure because I see Him, the invisible One.

By faith I see a Master Plan for the ages and beyond, and I know I am part of that plan, and for this I whisper, “Thank you, Jesus.” I sing a song to my Beloved, Hallelujah!

In Love with Him

- Eleanor Garrod-

That is certainly a fine sounding argument, dear sister.

But Jesus said in Luke 12:4-5 that after a person dies it is a real possibility they can be thrown into hell, and that such a fate is worse than death itself.

That seems both clear and irrefutable to me. If you get to meet God face to face, be sure to ask him if he feels like a failure over sending people, or the devil, or the devil's angels to hell. (Matthew 25:41)
 
Upvote 0

public hermit

social troglodyte
Site Supporter
Aug 20, 2019
12,670
13,517
East Coast
✟1,063,529.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
In Love with Him

The fact remains, however, and should be acknowledged, that there are relatively few verses that suggest Universalism whereas there are many that seem inescapably to be teaching that not everyone will be saved.

Albion, I am inclined to think you are right. But, it would be interesting to put it to the test. You hold that there are more passages asserting eternal damnation. FineLinen asserts that UR is clearly true. Would the two of you be willing to post the passages in support of your respective positions? I would be interested in seeing the tally, and I am sure others would be, as well. What say you?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saint Steven
Upvote 0

TheLostCoin

A Lonesome Coin
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2016
1,507
822
Ohio
✟279,420.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
The argument that "Origen was never condemned at the 5th Ecumenical Council" is revisionist nonsense. It's so evidently clear from historical documents as a fact that the Church, and the rest of the world which knew about the Council, understood the Council as condemning Origen.

The 6th Ecumenical Council explicitly states this. It states that Origen is a heretic who has been anathematized.

"Wherefore this our holy and Ecumenical Synod having driven away the impious error which had prevailed for a certain time until now, and following closely the straight path of the holy and approved Fathers, has piously given its full assent to the five holy and Ecumenical Synods (that is to say, to that of the 318 holy Fathers who assembled in Nice against the raging Arius; and the next in Constantinople of the 150 God-inspired men against Macedonius the adversary of the Spirit, and the impious Apollinaris; and also the first in Ephesus of 200 venerable men convened against Nestorius the Judaizer; and that in Chalcedon of 630 God-inspired Fathers against Eutyches and Dioscorus hated of God; and in addition to these, to the last, that is the Fifth holy Synod assembled in this place, against Theodore of Mopsuestia, Origen, Didymus, and Evagrius, and the writings of Theodoret against the Twelve Chapters of the celebrated Cyril, and the Epistle which was said to be written by Ibas to Maris the Persian), renewing in all things the ancient decrees of religion, and chasing away the impious doctrines of irreligion. And this our holy and Ecumenical Synod inspired of God has set its seal to the Creed which was put forth by the 318 Fathers, and again religiously confirmed by the 150, which also the other holy synods cordially received and ratified for the taking away of every soul-destroying heresy."

In fact, for the time, the 5th Ecumenical Council was kind of scandalous for many, esp. the Oriental Orthodox, because it was the first time in Church history where many were post-humously condemned. The First Ecumenical Council certainly condemned heresies post-humously of their author, but didn't condemn the dead authors by name when it happened.


You may think that the 5th Ecumenical Council's canons don't apply. But that's quite a difference than apologetic revisionism.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

TheLostCoin

A Lonesome Coin
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2016
1,507
822
Ohio
✟279,420.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
Moreover, a sharp distinction should be made between the "hope that all may be saved" and the "fact that all will be saved."

Many universalists will take texts which suggest the former and use it as evidence for the latter, but there's quite a difference between the two.

And it's quite ironically petulant and juvenile that Mr. Hart will just assume our intentions as malicious and wanting people to burn.

I don't want anyone going to Hell. I don't want to go to Hell. I legitimately do hope that all will be saved. But the Church has made it clear that believing as a dogmatic fact that all are, unquestionably, without a second thought, going to heaven, is false.

It also misunderstands greatly what constitutes Heaven and what constitutes Hell. To some degree, we clearly create our own Hell. Even ignoring texts which heavily suggest this, like Saint Gregory the Great's "single flame of hell which burns people disproportionately" theology or the Ethiopic text of the Apocalypse of Peter which says the same thing, the idea that many have gotten a grasp on to - we are punished in accordance with the sins we commit - necessarily implies this.

Religious artwork of the Last Judgment in most traditions implies this as well. Often times in depictions of Hell, whether it's Catholic, Orthodox, or Protestant works, we see different people punished in ways that suggest sins they've committed - for example, we see demons torturing people in ways or parts that suggest lust, demons biting obese people, people wearing riches being tormented, people wearing Bishop's clothes, etc.

Some examples:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/58/Vasnetsov_Last_Judgment.jpg

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/11/1e/68/111e6854e1e1f678e1ffe76ce26283a2.png

https://grecosghosts.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/cranach-last-judgement-nelson.jpg
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,264
✟584,012.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Let's have Fine Linen show us the verses that he thinks prove Universal Salvation. I contend that there are only about a half-dozen which seem to suggest such a thing.

On the other hand, I am sure that everybody here knows that there are many which talk of eternal death or the like, and counting all of them would take some time and effort. That time and effort would be a waste if the other side simply came back with verses that speak of God's love or etc. along with a claim that such verses "prove" Universal Salvation (which they do not).

But if that is unacceptable, I will post the verses that I say seem to suggest Universal Salvation. They are few enough that this would be done without much difficulty.
 
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,338
7,348
California
✟596,233.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
According to three irrefutable Jewish sources; the Jewish Encyclopedia, Encyclopedia Judaica and the Talmud, quoted below......
I have nothing against modern-day Jews.....but, personally, I am Christian so I don't give much credibility to these sources you cite in the formation of my faith.
 
Upvote 0

mkgal1

His perfect way sets me free. 2 Samuel 22:33
Site Supporter
Jun 22, 2007
27,338
7,348
California
✟596,233.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
I contend that there are only about a half-dozen which seem to suggest such a thing.
There are about the same number of passages that can be used for each of the three beliefs (ECT; Annihilationism; and Apokatastasis (Christian universalism). That's why the church has never formed any dogmatic doctrine on the issue:


helltextblog.jpg




" When I am lifted up from the earth, I will draw everyone to me.”~John 12:32
**********
Jesus must remain in heaven until the restoration of all things, about which God spoke long ago through his holy prophets.~Acts 3:21
************
In the same way that everyone dies in Adam, so also everyone will be given life in Christ.~1st Corinthians 15:22
*************
Who wants all people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth.~1 Timothy 2:4
***********
The grace of God has appeared, bringing salvation to all people.~Titus 2:11
************
The Lord isn’t slow to keep his promise, as some think of slowness, but he is patient toward you, not wanting anyone to perish but all to change their hearts and lives.~2nd Peter 3:9
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

TheLostCoin

A Lonesome Coin
Site Supporter
Sep 29, 2016
1,507
822
Ohio
✟279,420.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Republican
There are about the same number of passages that can be used for each of the three beliefs (ECT; Annihilationism; and Apokatastisis (Christian universalism). That's why the church has never formed any dogmatic doctrine on the issue:

The Church in the 6th century very clearly did.
 
Upvote 0

Kenny'sID

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 28, 2016
18,194
6,997
71
USA
✟585,424.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
In this short video, David Bentley Hart suggests that the emotionally-driven objection of many Christians to universal salvation/ restorationism is motivated by a childish view that 'For me to win, someone has to lose'.

His view there may be what's childish. I think the problem most have is we don't like false doctrine taught, it's dangerous...that simple. However, doesn't surprise me some would try to push the blame off on others in order to justify it.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.