Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
you sir are not invited back to this thread.
Because you have not read the Bible
why should I do it for you?
ok so one of us is confused..
I agree with those men more than I agree with anyone else in current time..
I am not discussing anything I post here with anyone ever again ok this is info for anyone who wants it or needs it to understand history period you fella I have a very unique history and I know what north american history really is so I plan to put bits and pieces of it here for all who wish to understand it and filter through it wisely because will have to use their studies to explain what they don't know i'm and putting stuff here for the wise or the wise enough only I am not going to argue or debate or whatever it is that goes down around here I sure don't need or want that kind 'fun'argue with your own selves..
I have to say she might be on to a little bit of something true.Christina Sarich wrote:
Our religions institutions are now (and have been) used by the crumbling powers-that-be to divide us. We separate ourselves not just as fundamentalists, but also as 'believers' in dogma of every flavor.
Then - there's science. Truly a 'religion' in its protectionist fervor, and hell-bent on upholding the discordant, outdated, simply false projections that are supported by institutionalized information parsing. It is upheld with tactics no less pernicious than organized religious institutions.
Questioning is the most important aspect of science, and that is a direct threat to authority, and ironically scientists and the science institutions have become authorities and churches. They have become our priests of the modern era. Whatever the priest with the biology hat says must be true about life. Whatever the priest with the physics hat says must be taught as facts. . . Science is no longer serving the purpose of discovering truth. It has become the main method of control. Governments have always kept people in line by collaborating with certain institutions. It used to be organized religion, where there basically was no difference between state and religion. Now, there is no difference between science and state. Why? Because of where the funding comes from.
Look up the phrase "Scientific history". It's an Oxymoron. There can be no such thing because Science can only make predictions about future events. "History" is mans written account of past events.
Never the twain shall meet.
Nobody ever comes here to discuss anything. People only come to this forum to learn from wise people who remember history as it really was. This forum is like the History channel for people who don't like pictures.
So what about forensic science? Do you not consider that a true science?
Hang on a sec, I like pictures.
oops
You don't decide that. The top line specifically says it is open to various forms of creationists, and so SW is allowed. Though SW and I disagree on a lot, I can say that SW has certainly read his Bible.
Papias
this article was in response to the original study ... and started throwing around dates to confuse the issues and twist the info in order to sway people into their way of seeing things."The new study looks at the "nuclear DNA" carried on the chromosomes in the cell nucleus. It is the latest in a series of genetic studies of polar bears published in recent years, each of which has prompted new ideas about the relationship between polar bears and brown bears. A 2010 study of fossils and mitochondrial DNA supported the idea that polar bears evolved from the ABC Islands brown bears. But a 2011 study of mitochondrial DNA from extinct Irish brown bears showed an even closer match to polar bears and suggested that polar bears got their mitochondrial DNA from hybridization with Irish bears. Shapiro, a coauthor of that study, said she now thinks the Irish brown bears may be another example of what happened in the ABC Islands, but she can't say for sure until she studies their nuclear DNA.
"In retrospect, I think we were wrong about the directionality of the gene flow between polar bears and Irish brown bears," she said.
Two studies published in 2012 sought to determine when the polar bear lineage diverged from the brown bear lineage using nuclear DNA data. The first, published in April in Science, put the split at 600,000 years ago and concluded that polar bears carry brown bear mitochondrial DNA due to past hybridizations. The second, published in July in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, suggested that brown bears, black bears, and polar bears diverged around 4 to 5 million years ago, followed by repeated episodes of hybridization between polar bears and brown bears.
The new study does not address the question of how long ago polar bears diverged from brown bears, but it may help sort out the conflicting results of recent studies. "It's a good step in the right direction of understanding what really happened," Shapiro said.""
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?