Ammunition against foolishness and more racism of modern "science" .

[NannaNae]

That is a lot of scientific garble for me. Is it saying that neanderthals are from a different branch of the evolutionary line than humans?

Consistently with a number of earlier studies, Neandertal genetic structure (heterozygosity, Fst, IBD) is most similar to that of Amerindians, among modern human populations. No surprise, Amerindians were excluded from this study.

well I been telling them for about 5 - 6 or 7 years that they are raciest goofballs with out a clue.. and to prove it , I told them neanderthals were really Choctaw or Chickasaw and they were all sea people but of the head shaping variety/clan types / not all head shaped.
then as the full genome was done they started finding the closest dna to
'neanderthals' was indeed native americans..
now they are trying to get their voodoo of science to catch up- and over come their special kind of
"indisputable " caldron and tarot cards kind of theories..
but truth is they are just clueless.

in the mean time in the last 500+ years since they "found the
the new world " they european countries have brought more than 1 million asian , siberians and south east asians and Polynesians to the new world .. and " scientists aren't even looking for their offspring nor have they even knowledge these people existence and their dna in the native gene pool... even whole tribes of pure blood asians who just got to south america.. .
think RICE, Pearl divers , railroad workers , fishing and siberian fur hunters and traders all across Canada from one side to the other side . no one knows how many and where because no one has ever looked for them.
they are also using these asians slaves dna and mtdna to prove their theories.. from caves called
"china lake" , peopled called it China Lake for a good reason.

cherry picking asians and calling them
"real native americans" and using their dna to tell people if they are native or not.
is well a criminal kind of ignorance at best.

I mean they don't even know how dna works, why it mutates because they don't understand dna yet. but that never stops them from stupid theories that are just criminal.

DNa is only about them and their theories, their constructs and what they think they see in a computer..
it is not about anyones ancestors! because they don't know even how we inherit our genes.

it is all about them.

 

[NannaNae]

Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: Nonmetric dental traits and the origin of East Asians

obviously it is a good possibility that some Siberian/russian fur traders genes did make it into Canada.

 

[NannaNae]

that ooparts is not millions of years old.. bronze age artifacts are not millions and millions of years old.. stuff has happened they refuse to acknowledge. nor do they even have a clue what they don't know.

Everything We Have Been Taught About Our Origins Is A Lie - Malta Now

 

[Lollerskates]

Iodine reduces radioactive counts, in carbon. In other words what is dated as 1 million years may only be 1000: it fools carbon dating. It is also used by scientist who lie about evolution, origins, dating and so on.

You wont find this on google (because it has been scrubbed,) and you will barely find it on duckduckgo.com. I found one paper on Scribd. Talk to a nuclear physica professor, and ask how iodine affects radioactive counts/lifetine without saying anything related to evolution or carbon dating. See how many beans s/he will spill.

 

[NannaNae]

Iodine reduces radioactive counts, in carbon. In other words what is dated as 1 million years may only be 1000: it fools carbon dating. It is also used by scientist who lie about evolution, origins, dating and so on.

You wont find this on google (because it has been scrubbed,) and you will barely find it on duckduckgo.com. I found one paper on Scribd. Talk to a nuclear physica professor, and ask how iodine affects radioactive counts/lifetine without saying anything related to evolution or carbon dating. See how many beans s/he will spill.

cool beans..
yep isn't it amazing how they might lie , sneak and worm their way around truth . to justify lies , so that no one can find out what is really happening.



˜Iodine Deficiency | Food with Iodine

where do we find iodine anyway.

Well an anything around cosmic events and radioactive elements ( and there have been many many huge events on many such soil levels .
They burn faster. like chain reactions..( search about tunguska event)
So wherever major cosmic events have taken place.. and on what soil level they had taken place can 'burn out " faster and appear older.
So even then it is assumed there is carbon 14 being created like it is now say before the flood..
Which they can't prove it always was being made by the atmosphere in a constant way or that it was even created before 4300 years ago. . throw in some new found sea water from a cosmic caused event..
so anything in sea water, might , could, can , should appear way older than it is right ? and carbon somehow changes that also..
so any event with cosmic radioactive elements mixed with sea water and ashes from a say terrestrial burn or maybe the space ash from the moon wouldn't be dated right.... rotf... how might we have guessed that could be the case .

well I knew that we had to take iodine during radioactive events to save our ?(liver or kidneys? or some organ?) from the radiation . so like yes that makes sense iodine would have to have some effect on radioactive elements to save us for sure! so today I just learned iodine is in sea water not just sea weed.. very interesting..
Oh and I also knew that if there is a cosmic event around you or a radioactive event around , we have to swim and soak in seal water.. now we know why...I thought it was the salt..

I believe sir we have found many of the elements for ( what is it they call it ?)" embedded age" or something like that. interesting.
thank you for that doozy!

 

[Lollerskates]

cool beans..
yep isn't it amazing how they might lie , sneak and worm their way around truth . to justify lies , so that no one can find out what is really happening.



˜Iodine Deficiency | Food with Iodine

where do we find iodine anyway.

Well an anything around cosmic events and radioactive elements ( and there have been many many huge events on many such soil levels .
They burn faster. like chain reactions..( search about tunguska event)
So wherever major cosmic events have taken place.. and on what soil level they had taken place can 'burn out " faster and appear older.
So even then it is assumed there is carbon 14 being created like it is now say before the flood..
Which they can't prove it always was being made by the atmosphere in a constant way or that it was even created before 4300 years ago. . throw in some new found sea water from a cosmic caused event..
so anything in sea water, might , could, can , should appear way older than it is right ? and carbon somehow changes that also..
so any event with cosmic radioactive elements mixed with sea water and ashes from a say terrestrial burn or maybe the space ash from the moon wouldn't be dated right.... rotf... how might we have guessed that could be the case .

well I knew that we had to take iodine during radioactive events to save our ?(liver or kidneys? or some organ?) from the radiation . so like yes that makes sense iodine would have to have some effect on radioactive elements to save us for sure! so today I just learned iodine is in sea water not just sea weed.. very interesting..
Oh and I also knew that if there is a cosmic event around you or a radioactive event around , we have to swim and soak in seal water.. now we know why...I thought it was the salt..

I believe sir we have found many of the elements for ( what is it they call it ?)" embedded age" or something like that. interesting.
thank you for that doozy!

There are so many problems.

One of the biggest I have is that scientists assume the halflife is constant, when they know events like supernovae, and other weak force reactions (radioactivity) can change the lifetimes of isotopes. Yet, they extrapolate over a constant time, ignoring the fact that they do not know how many events on earth or in the celestials have changed the half lives of any or all elements. Comets passing by, electromagnetic clouds, and many other things affect half lives. Even Marvel characters turn "super" from radiation surges. Art imitates life, not the other way around.

You use Iodine non-radioactive to let your thyroid absorb it so that you will not absorb radioactive iodide in radioactive explosions/reactions producing it. It is important for dietary health. And, it is in decent quantities in regular soil. So, a lot of these "fossils" could just be erroneously dated - whether maliciously and purposely, or by mistake.

I could go on and on... It is too bad people hug science like a "baby blankee," and cannot see that HUMANS CAPABLE OF EVIL are scientists - not Michael, Raphael, Christ and their appointee. Science is not perfect in knowledge, morals or ethics. Often times, it fails ethical and moral standards if we look closely. But, it has become synonymous with Truth even for believers. Not all science is bad, and not all scientists are liars. But, it is enough to constantly scrutinize all for yourself.

Cool indeed (especially sea water,) but still quite sinister overall.

 

[NannaNae]

There are so many problems.

One of the biggest I have is that scientists assume the halflife is constant, when they know events like supernovae, and other weak force reactions (radioactivity) can change the lifetimes of isotopes. Yet, they extrapolate over a constant time, ignoring the fact that they do not know how many events on earth or in the celestials have changed the half lives of any or all elements. Comets passing by, electromagnetic clouds, and many other things affect half lives. Even Marvel characters turn "super" from radiation surges. Art imitates life, not the other way around.

You use Iodine non-radioactive to let your thyroid absorb it so that you will not absorb radioactive iodide in radioactive explosions/reactions producing it. It is important for dietary health. And, it is in decent quantities in regular soil. So, a lot of these "fossils" could just be erroneously dated - whether maliciously and purposely, or by mistake.

I could go on and on... It is too bad people hug science like a "baby blankee," and cannot see that HUMANS CAPABLE OF EVIL are scientists - not Michael, Raphael, Christ and their appointee. Science is not perfect in knowledge, morals or ethics. Often times, it fails ethical and moral standards if we look closely. But, it has become synonymous with Truth even for believers. Not all science is bad, and not all scientists are liars. But, it is enough to constantly scrutinize all for yourself.

Cool indeed (especially sea water,) but still quite sinister overall.

he asks us to ask him first because only He is faithful to the explain the whole truth.
mankind is just not capable or not faithful if they are capable..

ONLY He is faithful , trustworthy and capable.
and he promises if we ask/knock/seek he will answer and we will find ..... and I got a like one billions questions and so far he is so all over that!
sometimes it takes him years to change me, because truth changes us .. he has to change me before I can understand that question I asked ages ago..
he is so serious about it too.

He means it when he says " Come let us reason together though your sins be as scarlet they shall be made white a snow" . through a process of seeking truth from him . he has to change us. His truth changes things.. he is so faithful to that.

He just doesn't want his kids to be ignorant and subject to men's ignorance either.

yes sure they are sinister ....
but he is faithful to reveal truth for us and all who ask him and those willing to get new ears that hear .. new eyes that see .. new heart that believes.. because truth changes us part by part, he replaces the old parts one by one..

 

[NannaNae]

Nobel Laurate Randy Schekman Says Leading Academic Journals Are Distorting Science & Represent a "Tyranny That Must Be Broken" (Dec. 11, 2013)


Nobel winner declares boycott of top science journals - Nature, Science
2013 12 10

Nobel laureate and biologist Randy Schekman has taken a stand and declared that luxury scientific journals are not furthering proper scientific method and are instead catering to trendy science, corrupted by a "tyranny" of "impact factor".

He’s calling for a boycott on ’peer-review’ science publications such as Nature, Cell, and Science which often obstruct true and valuable research in favour of supporting mainstream political and scientific consensus.

Bravo!

 

[Lollerskates]

Nobel Laurate Randy Schekman Says Leading Academic Journals Are Distorting Science & Represent a "Tyranny That Must Be Broken" (Dec. 11, 2013)


Nobel winner declares boycott of top science journals - Nature, Science
2013 12 10

Nobel laureate and biologist Randy Schekman has taken a stand and declared that luxury scientific journals are not furthering proper scientific method and are instead catering to trendy science, corrupted by a "tyranny" of "impact factor".

He’s calling for a boycott on ’peer-review’ science publications such as Nature, Cell, and Science which often obstruct true and valuable research in favour of supporting mainstream political and scientific consensus.

Bravo!

You should make a new thread about this, and see how many people dismiss this Laureate as a quack, hater of science, and/or not representative of real peer review.

 

[NannaNae]

You should make a new thread about this, and see how many people dismiss this Laureate as a quack, hater of science, and/or not representative of real peer review.

Go right ahead Lollerskates, if you feel the need to take high blood pressure pills for that kind of fun... go for it !!
your right they all will do just as you said !
they will all turn on each other like a pack of dogs too!
I'm not into that type carnage..
but if you would like to see what they do go for it

I do wish that the CF would color code the forums so I don't ever have to read in the non christian section. some of those goofballs can mess up my whole day with their special kind of ?????????????? :o

 

[NannaNae]

"""ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI—Recent micro-CT scans of a 100,000( filter this or count it as hole in a peg board not years , filter because of who it comes from, it just means old or pre flood (?giant?) ) -year-old human skull unearthed in Northern China in the 1970s have revealed the interior configuration of a temporal bone thought only to occur in Neanderthals. In fact, this arrangement of the inner ear has been used to classify skulls as Neanderthal since the mid-1990s. The other human teeth and bone fragments found with the skull, known as Xujiayao 15, all resemble an early, non-Neanderthal form of late archaic humans. And so, Erik Trinkaus of Washington University; Xiu-Jie Wu, Wu Liu, and Song Xing of the Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing; and Isabelle Crevecoeur of PACEA, Université de Bordeaux, expected the scan to reveal an inner ear formation resembling that found in modern humans. “We were completely surprised….This discovery places into question whether this arrangement of the semicircular canals is truly unique to the Neanderthals,” Trinkaus told Science Daily. “The study of human evolution has always been messy, and these findings just make it all the messier. It shows that human populations in the real world don’t act in nice, simple patterns.”"""

http://popular-archaeology.com/issu...hina-sheds-new-light-on-later-human-evolution


to think everyone came from the same place or everyone was getting it on with everyone else for a long time now .. either way it looks like man all came from the same place and it ain't Africa.. They are going to try
"out of america " next but it won't fly not quite.. so looks like West Eurasia wins! right now they have so many " back migrations" that they wont be able to prove there was ever the first one , last one, or a middle one. looks like we all came of of Ararat after all.. and not 10000+ years ago. too cool..

 

[NannaNae]

Scholarly journal retracts 60 articles, smashes ‘peer review ring’ - The Washington Post


finally !

some of this stuff reminds me of the study which says the smartest monkey sling pooooo . they are just the loneliest monkeys that you will ever know...
... well it seems the smartest scientist are pooh'er and pee'ers.... they especially enjoy pee on everything true and tell us it is raining and talk about climate change...... and if we disagree they tell us we are not intellectuals unless we enjoy getting peer'ed or is that poohed too .

rotf....

 

[NannaNae]

Science is open to error, misinterpretation and even fraud - The Washington Post

INTERESTING STUFF THERE!

 

[NannaNae]

Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: More selection on the X than in autosomes in humans
well it will take me a few weeks to understand if what they are saying here is what I had been harping on for 8 years. soon as I get it I will see.

and there is two on this site I hadn't visited in weeks.


Dienekes’ Anthropology Blog: Early Neandertal disappearance in Iberia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaşehir
please take note of the "Alicante" think PortAlegre , Algeria, Allegany, Alasehir http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaşehir

to think they are saying these are neanderthals... rotf... seems neanderthals were lovable and huggable.. and the love their brothers and their neighbors..



Elishah ( God saves) is SEA PEOPLE !!

SEEMS most of those city states were founded at different water levels because they were founded after different events science will never explain those events ... because in order to create years and steal time. they have to have no such events they have to have a static and secure and mystically magically safe world in order to create time by measuring ice and tree rings and dirt.. where there is no right to do that .

the Atlantic didn't take years and years and million of years to create, it happened in a day about 3200 years ago... or 2800 years ago.... we don't KNOW which , because no one will ask or answer that question........ instead we have the latest science fiction
"advanced aliens who had amazing technology were here billions and billions of years ago.." and even Panspermia and yes but that is just more of that militantly advancing black hole between our mankind ears!

NO they don't know nor will they ask or answer what happened in the world 2000-2100 years ago( see bible for earth shattering events at death and resurrection ) , they don't know nor will they ask or answer what happened abt 2800 hundred years ago ( see moabite stone) . they do no know nor will they ask what happened abt 3200 hundred years ago at the bonze age collapse (SEE Rhyniestone and or Serpent mound for great clues of some huge this way came at least once ) ,
they will not ask nor answer what happened 4300 hundred years ago see bible see Noah... . these powers and
"intellectuals " and " academia "are fools who think they are wise.

Instead they see what they want to see and believe what ever they wish to . but what God believes is that they are far away from the truth and want no part of him or his truths and real history.
but just so you can see it

about 2000-2100
about 3200
about 4300

= something that was periodic happened every 1000 - abt 25-35 = every 965 years or so years , sure looks that kind of periodic . and one of the events it came out of Draco's . 2800 or the (2000/3200/4300/this summer Russia, / whatever the event Nurgal was)

but if they can't and won't tell you what it was , how can they tell you what happened 6000 years ago.. they don't have a right to tell any one what yesterday much less 6000 years ago . so don't believe them! We can love them but with his kind of love , but don't believe them and certainly don't trust them either..

 

[SkyWriting]

they don't have a right to tell any one what yesterday much less 6000 years ago . so don't believe them! We can love them but with his kind of love , but don't believe them and certainly don't trust them either..

No new testament author or Jesus, believes that the date of creation was important enough to reveal or estimate.

You may have been led to believe that the age of creation is part of the Gospel message, but it is not.

 

[NannaNae]

you sir are not invited back to this thread.
any 6 years old can add. Because you have not read the Bible and nor do you know any eyewitness history because you have not looked nor searched for anything but what you want to believe..


God tracked each man from Noah to christ , anyone can add adams creation to cain's birth age to noah flood and from Noahs age to Abraham, Abrahams to David , david to Christ . you are not invited to this thread because you can not add. because you do not search for the truth .. instead you believe in monkey tales with out questioning...



so since you have not read those parts you do not want to know . you can speak here. because this subject is for every one who believes in eye witnessed history and not made up fairy tales by those to deem themselves more intelligent than both an eyewitness ability to record and every one who was pass down history somehow .

just go read and then go search and explain every OOpart.
anyway you are not invited to this thread because you can not add and you do not believe in eyewitnesses to history. not when any 6 year old can add it up for themselves ! I suspect jesus added this up when he was but a small child !


Gen 5:1
¶
This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him;

Gen 5:2
Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.

Gen 5:3
And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:

Gen 5:4
And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:5
And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.

Gen 5:6
¶
And Seth lived an hundred and five years, and begat Enos:

Gen 5:7
And Seth lived after he begat Enos eight hundred and seven years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:8
And all the days of Seth were nine hundred and twelve years: and he died.

Gen 5:9
¶
And Enos lived ninety years, and begat Cainan:

Gen 5:10
And Enos lived after he begat Cainan eight hundred and fifteen years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:11
And all the days of Enos were nine hundred and five years: and he died.

Gen 5:12
¶
And Cainan lived seventy years, and begat Mahalaleel:

Gen 5:13
And Cainan lived after he begat Mahalaleel eight hundred and forty years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:14
And all the days of Cainan were nine hundred and ten years: and he died.

Gen 5:15
¶
And Mahalaleel lived sixty and five years, and begat Jared:

Gen 5:16
And Mahalaleel lived after he begat Jared eight hundred and thirty years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:17
And all the days of Mahalaleel were eight hundred ninety and five years: and he died.

Gen 5:18
¶
And Jared lived an hundred sixty and two years, and he begat Enoch:

Gen 5:19
And Jared lived after he begat Enoch eight hundred years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:20
And all the days of Jared were nine hundred sixty and two years: and he died.

Gen 5:21
¶
And Enoch lived sixty and five years, and begat Methuselah:

Gen 5:22
And Enoch walked with God after he begat Methuselah three hundred years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:23
And all the days of Enoch were three hundred sixty and five years:

Gen 5:24
And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.

Gen 5:25
¶
And Methuselah lived an hundred eighty and seven years, and begat Lamech:

Gen 5:26
And Methuselah lived after he begat Lamech seven hundred eighty and two years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:27
And all the days of Methuselah were nine hundred sixty and nine years: and he died.

Gen 5:28
¶
And Lamech lived an hundred eighty and two years, and begat a son:

Gen 5:29
And he called his name Noah, saying, This same shall comfort us concerning our work and toil of our hands, because of the ground which the LORD hath cursed.

Gen 5:30
And Lamech lived after he begat Noah five hundred ninety and five years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:31
And all the days of Lamech were seven hundred seventy and seven years: and he died.

Gen 5:32
¶
And Noah was five hundred years old: and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth.


why should anyone have to argue time with someone who clearly can't add or who thinks themselves smarter than eyewitnesses!

 

[SkyWriting]

you sir are not invited back to this thread.
any 6 years old can add. Because you have not read the Bible and nor do you know any eyewitness history because you have not looked nor searched for anything but what you want to believe.. God tracked each man from Noah to christ , anyone can add adams creation to cain's birth age to noah flood and from Noahs age to Abraham, Abrahams to David , david to Christ . you are not invited to this thread because you can not add. because you do not search for the truth .. instead you believe in monkey tales with out questioning...

Speaking on that, I do not believe in common origins, and I do believe in special creation out of nothing.

There is no point in creating accusations about beliefs I don't hold. Try to quote me when you complain. The

button should work in these cases.

so since you have not read those parts you do not want to know

You mean like what I really believe? Yes, you should read it before offering your whine for others to drink.

. you can speak here. because this subject is for every one who believes in eye witnessed history and not made up fairy tales by those to deem themselves more intelligent than both an eyewitness ability to record and every one who was pass down history somehow .

just go read and then go search and explain every OOpart.
anyway you are not invited to this thread because you can not add and you do not believe in eyewitnesses to history. not when any 6 year old can add it up for themselves ! I suspect jesus added this up when he was but a small child !

And I "suspect" that the three wise visited the wrong manger and they made a movie about it called "Life of Brian". But lets stick to scripture.

Gen 5:1
¶
This is the book of the generations of Adam. In the day that God created man, in the likeness of God made he him;

Gen 5:2
Male and female created he them; and blessed them, and called their name Adam, in the day when they were created.

Gen 5:3
And Adam lived an hundred and thirty years, and begat a son in his own likeness, after his image; and called his name Seth:

Gen 5:4
And the days of Adam after he had begotten Seth were eight hundred years: and he begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:5
And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.

Gen 5:6
¶
And Seth lived an hundred and five years, and begat Enos:

Gen 5:7
And Seth lived after he begat Enos eight hundred and seven years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:8
And all the days of Seth were nine hundred and twelve years: and he died.

Gen 5:9
¶
And Enos lived ninety years, and begat Cainan:

Gen 5:10
And Enos lived after he begat Cainan eight hundred and fifteen years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:11
And all the days of Enos were nine hundred and five years: and he died.

Gen 5:12
¶
And Cainan lived seventy years, and begat Mahalaleel:

Gen 5:13
And Cainan lived after he begat Mahalaleel eight hundred and forty years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:14
And all the days of Cainan were nine hundred and ten years: and he died.

Gen 5:15
¶
And Mahalaleel lived sixty and five years, and begat Jared:

Gen 5:16
And Mahalaleel lived after he begat Jared eight hundred and thirty years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:17
And all the days of Mahalaleel were eight hundred ninety and five years: and he died.

Gen 5:18
¶
And Jared lived an hundred sixty and two years, and he begat Enoch:

Gen 5:19
And Jared lived after he begat Enoch eight hundred years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:20
And all the days of Jared were nine hundred sixty and two years: and he died.

Gen 5:21
¶
And Enoch lived sixty and five years, and begat Methuselah:

Gen 5:22
And Enoch walked with God after he begat Methuselah three hundred years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:23
And all the days of Enoch were three hundred sixty and five years:

Gen 5:24
And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.

Gen 5:25
¶
And Methuselah lived an hundred eighty and seven years, and begat Lamech:

Gen 5:26
And Methuselah lived after he begat Lamech seven hundred eighty and two years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:27
And all the days of Methuselah were nine hundred sixty and nine years: and he died.

Gen 5:28
¶
And Lamech lived an hundred eighty and two years, and begat a son:

Gen 5:29
And he called his name Noah, saying, This same shall comfort us concerning our work and toil of our hands, because of the ground which the LORD hath cursed.

Gen 5:30
And Lamech lived after he begat Noah five hundred ninety and five years, and begat sons and daughters:

Gen 5:31
And all the days of Lamech were seven hundred seventy and seven years: and he died.

Gen 5:32
¶
And Noah was five hundred years old: and Noah begat Shem, Ham, and Japheth.


why should anyone have to argue time with someone who clearly can't add or who thinks themselves smarter than eyewitnesses!

If you are accusing me of not being able to add....
I didn't see you doing any math at all.
Please show the answer and show your work.

 

[NannaNae]

and you don't think it is important enough to you do do it yourself? why should I do it for you?

 

[SkyWriting]

Any 6 years old can add. ...anyone can add ... you can not add..you can not add and you do not believe ... any 6 year old can add it up for themselves ! ... why should anyone have to argue time with someone who clearly can't add ....

Others have done the homework you refuse to consider. Most were older than 6 years old.
The second date is their conclusions:



Chronologist When Calculated? Date B.C.
1 Julius Africanus c. 240 5501
2 George Syncellus c. 810 5492
3 John Jackson 1752 5426
4 Dr William Hales c. 1830 5411
5 Eusebius c. 330 5199
6 Marianus Scotus c. 1070 4192
7 L. Condomanus n/a 4141
8 Thomas Lydiat c. 1600 4103
9 M. Michael Maestlinus c. 1600 4079
10 J. Ricciolus n/a 4062
11 Jacob Salianus c. 1600 4053
12 H. Spondanus c. 1600 4051
13 Martin Anstey 1913 4042
14 W. Lange n/a 4041
15 E. Reinholt n/a 4021
16 J. Cappellus c. 1600 4005
17 E. Greswell 1830 4004
18 E. Faulstich 1986 4001
19 D. Petavius c. 1627 3983
20 Frank Klassen 1975 3975
21 Becke n/a 3974
22 Krentzeim n/a 3971
23 W. Dolen 2003 3971
24 E. Reusnerus n/a 3970
25 J. Claverius n/a 3968
26 C. Longomontanus c. 1600 3966
27 P. Melanchthon c. 1550 3964
28 J. Haynlinus n/a 3963
29 A. Salmeron d. 1585 3958
30 J. Scaliger d. 1609 3949
31 M. Beroaldus c. 1575 3927
32 A. Helwigius c. 1630 3836

Biblical truth is told and retold in scripture in multiple voices and ways.
Each separate telling of a basic biblical principal ensures that the gospel
message is intact.

This recent christian cult has formed around the age of the earth and
of creation and the flood. These age estimates are not part of the
gospel message and should be avoided as not what Jesus taught.

 

[NannaNae]

Others have done the homework you refuse to consider. Most were older than 6 years old.
The second date is their conclusions:



Chronologist When Calculated? Date B.C.
1 Julius Africanus c. 240 5501
2 George Syncellus c. 810 5492
3 John Jackson 1752 5426
4 Dr William Hales c. 1830 5411
5 Eusebius c. 330 5199
6 Marianus Scotus c. 1070 4192
7 L. Condomanus n/a 4141
8 Thomas Lydiat c. 1600 4103
9 M. Michael Maestlinus c. 1600 4079
10 J. Ricciolus n/a 4062
11 Jacob Salianus c. 1600 4053
12 H. Spondanus c. 1600 4051
13 Martin Anstey 1913 4042
14 W. Lange n/a 4041
15 E. Reinholt n/a 4021
16 J. Cappellus c. 1600 4005
17 E. Greswell 1830 4004
18 E. Faulstich 1986 4001
19 D. Petavius c. 1627 3983
20 Frank Klassen 1975 3975
21 Becke n/a 3974
22 Krentzeim n/a 3971
23 W. Dolen 2003 3971
24 E. Reusnerus n/a 3970
25 J. Claverius n/a 3968
26 C. Longomontanus c. 1600 3966
27 P. Melanchthon c. 1550 3964
28 J. Haynlinus n/a 3963
29 A. Salmeron d. 1585 3958
30 J. Scaliger d. 1609 3949
31 M. Beroaldus c. 1575 3927
32 A. Helwigius c. 1630 3836

Biblical truth is told and retold in scripture in multiple voices and ways.
Each separate telling of a basic biblical principal ensures that the gospel
message is intact.

This recent christian cult has formed around the age of the earth and
of creation and the flood. These age estimates are not part of the
gospel message and should be avoided as not what Jesus taught.

ok so one of us is confused..

I agree with those men more than I agree with anyone else in current time..

I have the dates at
about 2000 Jesus
about 2800 years ago Hezekiah
about 3200 years ago Joshua
about 4700 years ago Noah + the age of his ancestors (+ 1743 =adam age when seth is born + seth age when his son is born +) people act as if as if Adam didn't know how old he was when his sons is born and was incapable of recording such. and that every subsequent generation through all time has been incapable of keeping a accurate record.
these adds too about 6000 years.

yet if we listen to the athiest on this list they say man is incapable of thought with out their help.. that mankind has been incapable of accurately recording what they have seen and what they have experienced in history.

they all wish to tell us how man has manipulated the history of the world and what other men have seen. they prove they distrust all pryor generations of humanity while claiming to trust the logic of humans more than god. but they prove they mis trust everyone but their own self..
they tell us no human eye witnesses are trust worthy to not manipulate and control history , but they have their heads so far up the south end of the north moving oppionions of mere man who never witnessed or even experienced anything, well anything any one would want to know about . men armed with special magic machines that keep them all very well mesmerized and bowing down to themselves .. loaded down with tons of putty and pure magic and a mystical shovel .. presto chango they have monkeys.

so I said about 6000 years ! give or take a few years here and there..
so is your "recent christian cult" have a 6000 year old earth? or is the "recent christian cult " have made a impotent god creator cod / savior that just happens to be called the same name as my God?