So Jesus is from Nazareth. That isn't a derogatory category.(CLV) Mt 2:23
And coming, he dwells in a city termed Nazareth, so that that may be fulfilled which is declared through the prophets that: A Nazarene shall He be called.
Upvote
0
So Jesus is from Nazareth. That isn't a derogatory category.(CLV) Mt 2:23
And coming, he dwells in a city termed Nazareth, so that that may be fulfilled which is declared through the prophets that: A Nazarene shall He be called.
What is your purpose of this line of posts?"Nazarenes" for Christians in Greek
In Acts, Paul of Tarsus is called, "a ringleader of the sect of the Nazoreans,"[8] thus identifying Nazorean with Christian. Although both "Christianios" (by Gentiles) and "Nazarenes" (by Jews) appear to have been current in the 1st century, and both are recorded in the New Testament, the Gentile name "Christian" appears to have won out against "Nazarene" in usage among Christians themselves after the 1st century
Nazarene (title) - Wikipedia
The verse has nothing to do with a sect of Judaism. The verse has nothing to do with Jesus being from Nazareth.Zechariah 3:
8 “‘Listen, High Priest Yahshua, you and your associates seated before you, who are men
symbolic of things to come: I am going to bring my servant, the Branch (Hebrew
Notsri; English Nazarene i.e. Yahshua the Nazarene)
Not an admission of belonging.Paul said his group was called "The Way"
Acts 24
14But this I confess to you, that according to the Way which they call a sect, so I worship the God of my fathers, believing all things which are written in the Law and in the Prophets
The Notsri, or "Nazarenes" was what the believing Jews in Jerusalem were first called. They continued to practice Judaism, attend synagogues, and even offer sacrifices. They were considered a Jewish sect until after the Bar Kochba war when they got kicked out of the synagogues. See Acts 21:20
Christianity isn't a sect of Judaism.
The Notsri, or "Nazarenes" was what the believing Jews in Jerusalem were first called. They continued to practice Judaism, attend synagogues, and even offer sacrifices. They were considered a Jewish sect until after the Bar Kochba war when they got kicked out of the synagogues. See Acts 21:20
Not an admission of belonging.
People were always identified as a secondary by the city/town.(CLV) Mt 2:23
And coming, he dwells in a city termed Nazareth, so that that may be fulfilled which is declared through the prophets that: A Nazarene shall He be called.
Now the Jews want to claim Paul. Am I in a dream?Your verse is what Jews are claiming. Your verse doesn't make Christianity a sect of Judaism.
“Hear now, O Joshua the high priest, thou, and thy fellows that sit before thee: for they are men wondered at: for, behold, I will bring forth my servant the BRANCH.”Zechariah 3:
8 “‘Listen, High Priest Yahshua, you and your associates seated before you, who are men
symbolic of things to come: I am going to bring my servant, the Branch (Hebrew
Notsri; English Nazarene i.e. Yahshua the Nazarene)
Christianity was a sect of Judaism - all of its leaders Jews - its Bible the OT, its teaching about the OT Messiah and as we see in Acts 13 Paul was asked to speak in the Synagogue -- not like he was of some foreign religion. There was nothing anti-OT about "The Messiah has come".
Lexicon :: Strong's H6780 - tsemach“Hear now, O Joshua the high priest, thou, and thy fellows that sit before thee: for they are men wondered at: for, behold, I will bring forth my servant the BRANCH.”
Zechariah 3:8 KJV
Zechariah 3:8; Hear now, O Joshua the high priest, thou, and thy fellows that sit before thee: for they are men wondered at: for, behold, I will bring forth my servant the BRANCH. #wondered…: Heb. of wonder, or, sign
Seems like you have a mix up. Notice that it says in Hebrew of wonder or sign.
Seems like your Hebrew is way off.
People were always identified as a secondary by the city/town.
Like so Mary of Magdalah.
Jesus of Narareth.
Just to clarify, a town geographically in a country does not equal a religion.
When did I say that it did? It's simply relevant to underlying subject.The verse has nothing to do with a sect of Judaism. The verse has nothing to do with Jesus being from Nazareth.
The verse has nothing to do with a sect of Judaism. The verse has nothing to do with Jesus being from Nazareth.
Because one is a religious sect and the other is a geographic location.Are you building your understanding on a false dichotomy? Why can't it be both? I love the depth of the layers in which Yahweh reveals his plan.
So which definition does it fall under? 1, 2 or 3Lexicon :: Strong's H6780 - tsemach
צֶמַח
Transliteration
tsemach
Pronunciation
tseh'·makh (Key)
Part of Speech
masculine noun
Root Word (Etymology)
From צָמַח (H6779)
Dictionary Aids
TWOT Reference: 1928a
KJV Translation Count — Total: 12x
The KJV translates Strong's H6780 in the following manner: Branch (4x), bud (3x), branch (1x), that which grew (1x), spring (1x), springing (1x), grew (1x).
Outline of Biblical Usage [?]
Strong’s Definitions [?](Strong’s Definitions Legend)
- sprout, growth, branch
- sprouting, growth, sprout
- growth (of process)
- sprout, shoot (of Messiah from Davidic tree)
צֶמַח tsemach, tseh'-makh; from H6779; a sprout (usually concrete), literal or figurative:—branch, bud, that which (where) grew (upon), spring(-ing).
Gesenius' Hebrew-Chaldee Lexicon [?]
Read the Full Entry
Your verse is what Jews are claiming. Your verse doesn't make Christianity a sect of Judaism.
Your verse is what Jews are claiming. Your verse doesn't make Christianity a sect of Judaism.