- Nov 21, 2008
- 51,357
- 10,608
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
Consider "the bible details"
=============================
Until you read Ephesians 6:2
And Romans 7
and Romans 13
=================================
Super easy example --
Eph 6
Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. 2 Honor your father and mother (which is the first commandment with a promise), 3 so that it may be well with you, and that you may live long on the earth.
"The FIRST ONE" with a promise. So now Paul is talking a specific unit of LAW and a specific order of the commandments.
So in the order in which we find it in the Bible it is the FIRST commandment with a promise.
So then is it the "FIRST in the 613" as we read the Bible in order,,, with a promise? Or is this specifically talking about the UNIT of TEN and the ORDER within that unit where we find the 5th commandment?
Are you simply avoiding this key bible detail with your "I read Eph 6:2"
The text quoted is from the TEN Commandments and in Eph 6:2 Paul argues that it continues - what is more Paul argues for its inclusion in the TEN - as forceful authority that would be accepted by the saints in the NT. He goes out of his way to do that.
Your quote of "you" noted -- now here is the quote of actual scripture refuting the speculation you offer in that post ...
Eph 6
Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. 2 Honor your father and mother (which is the first commandment with a promise), 3 so that it may be well with you, and that you may live long on the earth.
Were we "simply not supposed to notice"???
How was "that" ever supposed to happen???
=============================
Quoting a law from the ten is also quoting a law from the 613. Again, Paul makes no reference to the ten.
Until you read Ephesians 6:2
And Romans 7
and Romans 13
=================================
Super easy example --
Eph 6
Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. 2 Honor your father and mother (which is the first commandment with a promise), 3 so that it may be well with you, and that you may live long on the earth.
Okay, I read ephesians 6:2, one of the 613.
"The FIRST ONE" with a promise. So now Paul is talking a specific unit of LAW and a specific order of the commandments.
So in the order in which we find it in the Bible it is the FIRST commandment with a promise.
So then is it the "FIRST in the 613" as we read the Bible in order,,, with a promise? Or is this specifically talking about the UNIT of TEN and the ORDER within that unit where we find the 5th commandment?
Are you simply avoiding this key bible detail with your "I read Eph 6:2"
The promise is to the people who are under that covenant or are reciepients of the promises of that covenant.
I'm not sure what the other point is.
The text quoted is from the TEN Commandments and in Eph 6:2 Paul argues that it continues - what is more Paul argues for its inclusion in the TEN - as forceful authority that would be accepted by the saints in the NT. He goes out of his way to do that.
Paul is talking about a specific law. He is not talking anything about it's order or relationship to other laws. .
Your quote of "you" noted -- now here is the quote of actual scripture refuting the speculation you offer in that post ...
Eph 6
Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. 2 Honor your father and mother (which is the first commandment with a promise), 3 so that it may be well with you, and that you may live long on the earth.
Were we "simply not supposed to notice"???
How was "that" ever supposed to happen???
Upvote
0