Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
mlqurgw said:At least you are honest about the conclusion of your theology. The problem is that if man has a part then he is damned. There is only one thing which we can claim to be our own, our sin. All we can add to the work of Christ is sin. Would you add your sin to what Christ had done? Honestly, if what you say is correct then God must be the most frustrated and miserable being in there is. Such a statement robs Him of His Godhood.
jmacvols said:Did not Christ put belief and baptism BEFORE salvation in Mk 16:16? Did Not Peter put repentance and baptism BEFORE remission of sins? Yes on both counts.
Outrider said:The problem with the "in Christ" theology
Outrider said:is that the sinner may be surrounded with the righteous Christ, but, being a sinner, he has brought his unrighteousness into Christ, making Christ unrighteous and thereby having no righteousness to be surrounded in, which puts him back to square one...except that now he has an unrighteous and impotent Christ to deal with.
Augustine_Was_Calvinist said:Paul is talking to those who profess faith
Scripture teaches clearly that the natural man can read and hear all there is to be read and heard and will not understand because they are spiritually discerned.
So then, what they read is not one of the "things of the Spirit of God."
Augustine_Was_calvinist said:What you are doing is sidestepping the issue laid before you in 1 Corinthians 2 that tears apart your presupposition, with a canned response.
Augustine_Was_Calvinist said:Both of those have been answered. Please do not be redundant and refuse to acknowledge they have been answered, it's not intellectually honest.
Augustine_Was_Calvinist said:One more time, 1 Corinthians 2 is plain as the sun in the sky, that the natural man cannot understand the things of the Spirit.
So, you want us to believe that Scripture contradicts itself?
Apparently you do.
Again, you are sidestepping the issue that 1 Corinthians 2 presents with a canned response.
jmacvols said:Anyone who has a desire to understand the bible can, it does not take intervening by the HS to give understanding.
jmacvols said:I have answered it 3 or 4 times. You simply do not like the answer I gave.
jmacvols said:You never explain why a man instructed the eunuch. Why did Philip need to go a ways to find the eunuch and teach him, when the HS could have instantly "illuminated" him? The eunuch was taught by a man.
You never explained the confusion among those "taught" by the HS other than saying some are false teachers. I am sure the ones you refer to as "false teachers" are those that don't agree with you. No doubt they look at you as a false teacher. So those that believe they have been "taught" by the HS 1) do not agree with each other and 2) call each other false teachers.
Augustine_Was_Calvinist said:Like all who pervert the Scriptures, you read a formula into those passages, in the great majority of passages pertaining to salvation, the one thing that is absolutely neccessary is to "believe". Those who believe, will be baptized.
Augustine_was_Calvinist said:Oh no, once again you show a terrible misunderstanding of the Scriptures.
If you can obey, which means you have to obey faultlessly, perfectly, then you can win eternal life.
But you cannot do that, nor do you realize the gravity and depth of your sin and to the extent that your sin is offensive to God.
Just ONE sin makes you guilty of all sin. One single sin is infinitely sinful to an Infinitely Holy God.
So, every time you do not obey perfectly, you are then infinitely sinful in the eyes of the Infinitely Holy God, and wipes out all those things you have done that you think secures your salvation.
Christ's death, purchased the infinitely sinful from their state, with His Infinite Righteousness, that covers all disobedience.
Augustine_Was_Calvnist said:Now you are getting closer. The sheep that have been given to Christ by the Father do hear and they do follow, because they have been given a new heart with which to do so, but their obdience is not the cause of salvation but the result of salvation.
Augustin_was_calvinst said:Once again your misunderstanding of the Scriptures shines out like a supernova, for Isaiah is addressing the wickedness of "all the nations", and is describing the state of all humanity, just as Paul does in Romans 2 quoting the Psalmists and Prophets.
Yes the righteousness is of the Lord. But the question is: "where is it stated that Christ's righteousness, the righteousness of His life here on earth, is imputed to us?"mlqurgw said:Not at all. Since you don't seem to be able to understand basic things let me explain. No one is justified by their own works righteousness. To be justified you must have kept the law perfectly. Neither you nor I have ever been able to do this. To be justified we must have the perfect righteousness of another counted as our own ( imputed). Read Psalm 24. Christ is Jehovah-tsidkenu, the LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS.
Isa 54:17 No weapon that is formed against thee shall prosper; and every tongue that shall rise against thee in judgment thou shalt condemn. This is the heritage of the servants of the LORD, and their righteousness is of me, saith the LORD.
Outrider said:The problem with the "in Christ" theology is that the sinner may be surrounded with the righteous Christ, but, being a sinner, he has brought his unrighteousness into Christ, making Christ unrighteous and thereby having no righteousness to be surrounded in, which puts him back to square one...except that now he has an unrighteous and impotent Christ to deal with.
mlqurgw said:At least you are honest about the conclusion of your theology. The problem is that if man has a part then he is damned.
mlqurgw said:There is only one thing which we can claim to be our own, our sin. All we can add to the work of Christ is sin. Would you add your sin to what Christ had done? Honestly, if what you say is correct then God must be the most frustrated and miserable being in there is. Such a statement robs Him of His Godhood.
Augustine_Was_Calvinist said:No, actually, your heretical sect is in allignment with the Roman church on a great many erroneous doctrines. Here are a few:
1)Baptismal regeneration
2)Works complete salvation
3)Salvation can be lost
4)Denial of imputed righteousness
5)Baptism neccessary for salvation
6)both are big on formulas
7)denial of the sufficiency of the Cross to purchase salvation for the Elect
Just to name a few.
As I said, for a sect that is as anti-catholic as the CoC is, you sure do share a lot of the same errors.
Augustine_Was_Calvinist said:You are are avoiding the question.
Is the Gospel spiritual?
Is the Gospel spiritually discerned?
Is the Gospel a "thing of God"?
Yes or no?
Augustine_Was_Calvinist said:1 Corinthians 2 says that "uninspired men like you" cannot understand without the Spirit being present within them, and find it foolishness.
Outrider said:Let's see. That's like saying George W. Bush is the President because he'll be elected next year. I don't think you understand the meaning of the term "election" on even the most elementary level.
Outrider said:There was no choice even for the elect to make. The elect were unable to choose Christ in the first place.
Do I really need to explain the entire doctrine of salvation in and by Christ in every response I give on these boards? I will say this one more time. I willingly chose Christ because He first made me see my need of Him. He first gave me eyes and a heart to believe. I heard the Gospel preached all my life but was unregenerate and inwardly rebellious in every thought. Once He opened my eyes and gave me ears to hear I believed and was baptized. It was His work in me and for me that I neither could or would do for myself that made the difference. He conquered me by His Word and then comforted me by Christ. I received life passively and believed actively. Faith is simply relying on Christ for all. It is resting in Him not in ourselves. It is impossible for a man to give up his self-righteousness and do nothing but that is what faith is. Once we have faith then we do, realizing even then that all we do is mixed with sin. Now that I trust Christ alone I need not look to myself at all. That is where the peace that passes understanding comes from. Resting in Christ and not in my obedience. Looking to Him for all the blessings of God and all my acceptance with God. Christ is all.jmacvols said:When those on Pentecost asked Peter what shall we do, Peter replied, "Nothing! Else you're damned!"
Is your obedience without sin?Obedience adds nothing, it is part of.
holdon said:No sinner brings unrighteousness into Christ thereby making Christ unrighteous. In Christ we are a new creation....
Which came first, the particular class of people or the election.jmacvols said:No, you fail to understand that God elected a class of people-Christians, not any particular individuals.
Whosoever is not a universal pronoun. It deals with a particular class of people.Anyone can choose to be a Christian-part of the elect. "whosoever"-Jn 3:16, Rev 22:17.
Outrider said:So, where do we get righeousness from? And how?
So then God just declares you righteous without any actual righteousness being worked out?holdon said:Romans 3:22 "righteousness of God by faith of Jesus Christ towards all, and upon all those who believe"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?