• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Abortion is MURDER!!!!!

liesje

Singing in the rain
Aug 30, 2008
1,714
33
✟24,566.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
They are always human, at the point in which they are solely dependent on the woman carrying them they are a human fetus. When they are no longer solely dependent on the woman carrying them, (ie when they are born) they are a human being. It's about transferability. Once a child is born, anyone can care for it. That's not the case with a fetus. As soon as the fetus is born, and turns into an infant, it is a separate and independent entity, and thus killing it would be wrong at that point.

But that's just your opinion. Can you back it up? How is the child any different a minute before it's born to a minute after, and yet those two minutes make the difference between whether we should be able to kill it or not? As well as that, the baby is still dependent on the mother. And what about premature babies? Babies born many many weeks early can survive outside the womb? Is the age of "human being-ness" different in each child? What's the difference between a human and a human being? It's just a play on words. If the fetus is human and the fetus is a being, that makes it a human being.
 
Upvote 0

lux et lex

light and law
Jan 8, 2009
3,457
168
✟27,029.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
A baby is not dependent on its mother. It is dependent on someone...anyone. Which makes it different from a fetus. Constitutional rights are bestowed upon one who is BORN in the United States, so yes, there are gestational variances that would cause some fetuses to not attain "born" status at the same time as others. Premies would get a head start, while others, like myself, who was over 3 weeks overdue, would get a later start. But at the time of birth, that is when personhood begins.
 
Upvote 0

lux et lex

light and law
Jan 8, 2009
3,457
168
✟27,029.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
You call them a human fetus, but God calls them a human being

Perhaps it is the women's responsibility to take care of them in the womb, and it is her responsibility if she murders the child

Wrong with all due respect Mam! You are completely wrong and are wicked in your words

Killing it is wrong at the point of Conception and afterwards, no more excuses

Repent for your words are false and in wicked form

The fact you can sit here and say its ok to murder a baby is shocking and scary

May God save this world, for I guarantee you by the Lord's final return every abortion clinic will be shut down, and God will have vengeance on those who have not repented for killing their child

Again, calm down. Please stop attacking me as a person. I have been very patient with you up to this point, but this is starting to get old. No one is murdering babies. Aborting fetuses. Two very different things, even though I know you don't realize/recognize a difference. But your ignorance is not my problem.
 
Upvote 0

liesje

Singing in the rain
Aug 30, 2008
1,714
33
✟24,566.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
A baby is not dependent on its mother. It is dependent on someone...anyone. Which makes it different from a fetus. Constitutional rights are bestowed upon one who is BORN in the United States, so yes, there are gestational variances that would cause some fetuses to not attain "born" status at the same time as others. Premies would get a head start, while others, like myself, who was over 3 weeks overdue, would get a later start. But at the time of birth, that is when personhood begins.

But in reality the only discriminating factor there is place of residence, as in inside or outside the womb. What if there was no Constitution then? What is personhood, and why should it only be given to babies at birth?
 
Upvote 0
Mar 25, 2005
280
47
USA
✟23,167.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
hmmm no one responded to the links i posted about fetus psychology and how they have at least 12 senses early in development, and can interact with the outside world. THEY CAN FEEL PAIN!!!

also, if it is not killing and not wrong, why do so many of these women regret it and/or feel terrible about it for years afterwards? if it wasn't wong why would they feel bad about it?
 
Upvote 0

lux et lex

light and law
Jan 8, 2009
3,457
168
✟27,029.00
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
also, if it is not killing and not wrong, why do so many of these women regret it and/or feel terrible about it for years afterwards? if it wasn't wong why would they feel bad about it?

I've made a lot of decisions that I feel terrible about years later. They weren't wrong decisions, just decisions that I regret. Lots of things aren't wrong, but one can still feel bad about them.

I know several people that have had abortions. Some regret, some know it was a good decision. It's up to the person.
 
Upvote 0
Mar 25, 2005
280
47
USA
✟23,167.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
I would still like some comments from those that argue fetuses are just things and not human beings

I'll paste from the site to make it easier to access
from what I can tell this is a secular, not a religious site.

During most of the 20th Century, scientists doubted the presence of functioning senses during fetal life. Touch was merely “reflexive”, hearing severely “dampened” (if not drowned) in the liquid environment of the womb; vision was primitive at best, first blocked by closed eyelids, and then distorted under water; and the sense of smell was judged “impossible” without air. By the end of the century, however, experts were reaching for a consensus that there could be touch, hearing, and tasting in utero. Nevertheless, considering the immaturity of the brain in utero, skepticism remained about how any sensory information could be given real meaning. In 1988 I was in a small minority who found evidence for five senses operating meaningfully by birth.
Today, a few authorities are declaring that the idea of “five” human senses--an idea dating from the Renaissance--is a dubious oversimplification. The correct number, some suggest, is between 5 and 17 (e.g., Rivlin & Gravelle, 1984, Deciphering the Senses: The Expanding World of Human Perception). Encouraged by this assessment, I have taken another look at the experimental and clinical evidence (including experiences reported by my own clients) and would like to propose there are at least twelve senses already operating in utero. In brief, this is my list of twelve.

(1) Touch (including both receiving touch, and reaching out to touch) is the first sense to develop.
(2) Thermal sensing of hot and cold is indeed real, but usually overlooked.
(3) Pain sensing (now termed nociception) involves crushing and nerve damage. The reality of this experience was tragically overlooked in creating the protocols of obstetrics and neonatology.
(4) Hearing begins as early as 14 weeks after conception, then improves steadily with the arrival of cochlear resources and full growth of the external ear.
(5) Balance and orientation in space develops from week 7 to 12.
(6) The chemosensors of smell operate in close association with the chemosensors of
(7) taste as both are bathed by amniotic fluids passing through the nasal area.
(8) “Mouthing” is used to explore texture, hardness, and contours of objects; this sense is not about eating and nutrition.
(9) Sucking and licking in the womb are mouth-related pleasure senses. The sucking of fingers and toes is not nutritive. Male thumb sucking, seen as early as 13 weeks, is often paired with erections, suggesting sexual sensations. Ultrasound reveals prenates licking the placenta and twins licking each other, suggesting pleasure in bodily contact.
(10) Vision in utero is paradoxical because limited by eyelids being fused shut for about six months, yet it seems functional in being able to hit targets like needles during amniocentesis at 14 to 16 weeks of age. Some form of vision seems to facilitate twins boxing, kicking, kissing, and playing together in the womb.
(11) Although prenates have never been acknowledged for their psychic senses, they do demonstrate at least clairvoyance and telepathic sensing and attunement with parents whether they are near or far from each other; they know whether they are wanted or not, and discern the emotional disposition, and character of those around them.
(12) Finally, prenates also demonstrate transcendent sensing as they report out-of-body and near-death experiences. When out-of-body, for example, no senses should work for either babies or adults, but they do. In transcendent states, even immature senses function well and events are stored in memory--as can be demonstrated years later.

Thus, I conclude that contrary to both popular and scientific belief, babies operate in the womb with a rich spectrum of senses.

-------


also


Prenates and newborns arrive in this world equipped with universal human languages made possible by the voluntary movement which begins around ten weeks gestational age. Early expressive movement is facilitated by a spectrum of developing senses including at least touch, thermal experiences, taste, odor, hearing, licking, sucking, and even vision. The communication repertoire includes verbal and non-verbal expressions, body color, emotional behaviors, crying, withdrawal, hand gestures, a range of facial statements, instant imitation, and lip-reading. Thus, all humans are prepared to send and receive messages and to dialog with parents long before the development of formal language.



from http://www.birthpsychology.com/apppah/introducingAPPPAH.html
 
Upvote 0

NDNgirl4ever

LPN, Vegan Hippie Freak, and Tony Orlando and Dawn
Sep 12, 2004
639
57
38
Florida
Visit site
✟23,598.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
As well as that, the baby is still dependent on the mother.
The fact that single fathers,grandparents,siblings,adoptive parents, and others have taken care of newborns by themselves disproves that argument. As Lux said, a newborn is dependent on other people, but it's doesn't have to be the mother.
 
Upvote 0

liesje

Singing in the rain
Aug 30, 2008
1,714
33
✟24,566.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The fact that single fathers,grandparents,siblings,adoptive parents, and others have taken care of newborns by themselves disproves that argument. As Lux said, a newborn is dependent on other people, but it's doesn't have to be the mother.

No, it doesn't have to be the mother, but why should it matter if it is the mother or someone else the baby is dependent on? It's still dependent on someone, so arguing that it can be aborted because it's only dependent on it's mother really isn't valid.
 
Upvote 0
Mar 25, 2005
280
47
USA
✟23,167.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
So you can copy and paste from a website. Good job. Do you have any original thoughts or just go with copying what others postulate?

You appear to be avoiding the question and missing the point. Its not like what I pasted had anything to do with the abortion argument. I am simply using evidence that they are still human beings.
 
Upvote 0

LyraJean

Newbie
Mar 6, 2010
651
68
Florida
Visit site
✟23,900.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
By whom then? Do we kill the unborn who did nothing wrong?

I've been on vacation which is why I haven't been around.

It was decided by her mother. She was raped and her mom did the only thing she knew to take care of her daughter. Daughter didn't really understand what was going on at the time.

Do so called Christians sympathize with her or try to understand. No, they only heap more guilt and shame upon than what she is already feeling. They just tell her crap like, "Well, you shouldn't have let your Mom murder your baby."
 
Upvote 0

LyraJean

Newbie
Mar 6, 2010
651
68
Florida
Visit site
✟23,900.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I really don't understand how anyone can have debate about this. Its not the baby's fault that their mother doesn't want them. That doesn't mean they should be killed.. why cant they be adopted?

You do know how many children are in the system right now? How many of those thousands of children did you adopt?
 
Upvote 0

LyraJean

Newbie
Mar 6, 2010
651
68
Florida
Visit site
✟23,900.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
You call them a human fetus, but God calls them a human being

Perhaps it is the women's responsibility to take care of them in the womb, and it is her responsibility if she murders the child

Wrong with all due respect Mam! You are completely wrong and are wicked in your words

Killing it is wrong at the point of Conception and afterwards, no more excuses

Repent for your words are false and in wicked form

The fact you can sit here and say its ok to murder a baby is shocking and scary

May God save this world, for I guarantee you by the Lord's final return every abortion clinic will be shut down, and God will have vengeance on those who have not repented for killing their child

Have you read the OT recently. In it God orders the Jewish people to kill everyone. Men, women, children, even the animals. He didn't say spare the pregnant women either.
 
Upvote 0
Mar 25, 2005
280
47
USA
✟23,167.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Republican
Have you read the OT recently. In it God orders the Jewish people to kill everyone. Men, women, children, even the animals. He didn't say spare the pregnant women either.

many old testament rules no longer apply...so this is not a good argument


also, I find it pretty telling that no one has anything to say against my argument from psychology that they are human beings..
 
Upvote 0

laconicstudent

Well-Known Member
Sep 25, 2009
11,671
720
✟16,224.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
I personally disagree with abortion, but I'm not a woman. I wonder why so many other men seem to feel it appropriate to wrap themselves in self-righteous indignation and start condemning women for an act that they can't even begin to identify with.

I do, however, find the sanctimoniousness of it all somewhat entertaining. :)
 
Upvote 0
Sep 22, 2010
14
0
Brisbane, Australia
✟22,630.00
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Private
I personally disagree with abortion, but I'm not a woman. I wonder why so many other men seem to feel it appropriate to wrap themselves in self-righteous indignation and start condemning women for an act that they can't even begin to identify with.

I tend to agree.

I'm no expert, but I think abortion is wrong. You may argue that it isn't a human being; it's a potential life that is not able to survive without the mother etc. But I have a problem with that.

If I had my arms, legs and genitalia removed after an accident and was in hospital in a coma; dependent on others for survival; would I still be a human? Yes. So human-ness isn't just physical. There is more to it.

At the end of the day, God is just. He is good. He is love.
 
Upvote 0

LyraJean

Newbie
Mar 6, 2010
651
68
Florida
Visit site
✟23,900.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
many old testament rules no longer apply...so this is not a good argument


also, I find it pretty telling that no one has anything to say against my argument from psychology that they are human beings..

Just the rules that support your argument apply. But that's a different conversation.

Pro-choice means it is up to the individual woman to choose whether she wants to keep the baby or not. After all we have no idea what the other woman is going through. So I am pro-choice, anti-abortion.

If you were to make abortion illegal how would you enforce that law? Even before Roe v. Wade when it was illegal it wasn't considered murder.

I enjoy separation of church and state thank you very much.
 
Upvote 0

LyraJean

Newbie
Mar 6, 2010
651
68
Florida
Visit site
✟23,900.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Methodist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

I don't know know Britain's free speech laws so I cannot give an informed opinion on the article.

Perhaps their group could start a counseling program for women thinking of getting an abortion. Finding out why these women are considering abortion as an option and then try to change their minds without heaping guilt and shame upon them. Or they could start adopting children.
 
Upvote 0