• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Status
Not open for further replies.

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,883
7,533
Columbus
✟784,460.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Which is nothing like the post I was replying to.
You can bury you head in the sand if you want to but it does not change what is.......
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncle Siggy
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
You can bury you head in the sand if you want to but it does not change what is.......
It isn't a matter of anyone burying their head in the sand. The post to which AirPo responded does not say anything like what you said. You're wrong.
 
Upvote 0

Douglas Hendrickson

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 27, 2015
1,951
197
83
✟178,415.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Private
For those who are proponents of abortion, If the medical/scientific community can come up with an artificial womb that could support a growing fetus to term, would that be an acceptable alternative to aborting the fetus? Or does the woman HAVE to have a dead fetus?
The point of using the ultimate in birth control is not (ever) to have a child, to avoid birthing another child that would have to be cared for until it can care for itself and surely an artificial womb doing that without real parenting, even if it could, would never be desirable. Plus the world certainly does not need another person any time soon to further denude it.
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,883
7,533
Columbus
✟784,460.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
It isn't a matter of anyone burying their head in the sand. The post to which AirPo responded does not say anything like what you said. You're wrong.
Go ahead and bury your head right next to him......He got a shorthand explanation of it. If the 2 of you don't understand it....too bad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Uncle Siggy
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Go ahead and bury your head right next to him......He got a shorthand explanation of it. If the 2 of you don't understand it....too bad.
You are wrong yet again...

Whatever. You can think what you want, but you're wrong...
 
Upvote 0

Douglas Hendrickson

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 27, 2015
1,951
197
83
✟178,415.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Private
Actually, it is a chicken after it's fertilized. You know that there are societies that favor fertilized eggs over non-fertilized? There's feathers, beaks, feet and claws. That's a chicken!
Yah right, you ever get an egg that had a bit of blood in it? Probably that means it was fertilized.
Actually you would never be so foolish as to take the egg (with a little blood in it) and roast it like a chicken. You would never treat it like a chicken, nor should you ever treat it like a chicken. Because it is certainly NOT a chicken.

Like I say, most people can tell the difference between a chicken and an egg, and an egg though it may be some way along in the gestation process from when it was fertilized, would never pass as a chicken in commerce or otherwise.
If it's in an intact shell it's still an egg, and like you at one point correctly characterized it, a "fertilized egg...."
(Just like if a fetus is still in the womb it is not a child, in case you didn't notice.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archivist
Upvote 0

Uncle Siggy

Promulgator of Annoying Tidbits of Information
Dec 4, 2015
3,652
2,737
Ohio
✟61,528.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
I think it is just the word "free".

Yeah you're probably right about that. Why would they get themselves a good education/job that would enable them to do so many things. Like have a nice house or nice car or maybe even go overseas to see what the rest of the world is really like. But that would be too inconvenient and time consuming.
So they insist on being less than they can be and vote for handouts instead...
 
  • Like
Reactions: civilwarbuff
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,883
7,533
Columbus
✟784,460.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
  • Like
Reactions: Uncle Siggy
Upvote 0

Douglas Hendrickson

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 27, 2015
1,951
197
83
✟178,415.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Private
Douglas Hendrickson said:
There is one basic problem with this, and it is the failure to see the difference between "human" and "human being."
"... only became human when we had our umbilical cord severed" should read: "became a human being," and then it would be true. To understand better the difference between before birth and after see my post above, #1076. There is a difference of dependencies, but more important a difference of being, there exists an actual animal (human) being only after birth. A new member of the human species. Just like there are never any pigs in a pigs belly - we do not count pig fetuses as pigs, because they are not. So too is a chicken egg not a chicken even if it is fertilized.
Most people are able to tell the difference between a chicken and an egg!
Sorry I don't get your point. A pig fetus is still a pig. So? A fertilized chicken egg is still a chicken, although not fully developed yet, but it's still a chicken.

The basis of the argument is the fact that there is no difference between a human and human being. That is a philosphical argument. A person in a vegitative state could be considered a human, but not a human being because they are dependent on others for survival. As could many other humans on this planet. Most children could not survive on their own. They are still human beings. The fact that the baby in the mothers womb cannot survive without being in the mothers womb is meaningless. You obviously are debating the humanity of a human. Once you go down that road you are placing yourself into the position to decide what is human and what is not. That road inevitably leads to deciding if a person outside the womb is a human being. And what constitutes a human being. You do NOT get to decide that. No one should. But that is exactly what you have done. Placed yourself in the position on who lives and who dies based on YOUR definition of what is a human being. And that is as immoral as it comes.

What is it about, "there are never any pigs in a pigs belly" you don't understand? That you say "A pig fetus is still a pig. So?"
On the chicken/egg thing, see my post #1177.

Please read a little more closely - I do not here speak of "a human," I was contrasting "human" and "human being."
"Human" is an adjective and often indicates "is composed of human cells." Has human DNA, like the cancer and the severed leg.
I am not at all talking about "the humanity of a human." But it IS important to understand "what is human and what is not," and the reference to DNA just above goes in that direction. To repeat myself, human DNA like in the fetus and the cancer is one marker of the "human." (Note I did not here say a human.)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Douglas Hendrickson

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Sep 27, 2015
1,951
197
83
✟178,415.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Private
Why would you not want to cut off a cancer?.....that makes no sense....
Because it has human DNA, just like the fetus!
I wouldn't mind cutting it off, but it seems there are others around that if they wanted to be consistent, would never remove a cancer.
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,883
7,533
Columbus
✟784,460.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Because it has human DNA, just like the fetus!
I wouldn't mind cutting it off, but it seems there are others around that if they wanted to be consistent, would never remove a cancer.
A fetus is not a cancer.....just in case you have not figgered that out.....
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,883
7,533
Columbus
✟784,460.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Upvote 0

PapaZoom

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2013
4,377
4,392
car
✟66,806.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
Funny how you left out the fact that a woman has the proper justification.

There is no justification to deliberately take the life of another human being for convenience sake. Either way, the bodily rights argument is violated.
 
Upvote 0

PapaZoom

Well-Known Member
Nov 3, 2013
4,377
4,392
car
✟66,806.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Private
The abortion issue is clear. The woman is paying a doctor to kill and in many cases, dismember the body of another human being. In spite of the claim that a woman has the right to do with her body what she wants, an abortion procedure is being done on the body of another human and NOT the woman's body - yet she is the one who is making the bodily rights claim. 650,000 females in the United States are being denied the right to bodily autonomy every year. Worse is that someone else is making a decision that directly affects the body of another - to the point of killing the other human beings! This includes killing procedures that sever limbs and even decapitation! And the limbs aren't cleanly cut off either. They are ripped off the body of the human being using instruments designed for just that! This is how the pro abortion side ultimately defines bodily rights. It's the powerful preying on the weakest humans and using that power to kill them at will.
 
Upvote 0

Archivist

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Mar 5, 2004
17,332
6,439
Morgantown, West Virginia, USA
✟617,196.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
The abortion issue is clear.
Most issues are clear when someone else has to decide them. You want to make the decision for others so of course the issue is clear to you.
 
Upvote 0

SteveB28

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2015
4,032
2,426
97
✟21,415.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
I doubt it. Most people don't respond to post-mortem surveys. I know I don't. Every time I've been hospitalized, a few weeks later I get a "How did we do?" survey, and toss them, unless I have a serious complaint.

This will no doubt amaze you, but you are not "most people"!
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.