Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I never heard anyone say that. Georges LeMaitre, the originator of Big Bang theory, didn't say that.Atheist and agnostics saying that before the bang, there was only a speck of infinite energy.
No, I am sorry, but "look at the trees" is not evidence. You are making a logical fallacy known as an Argument From Ignorance.Evidence for design is everywhere. Anyone that can look at the universe and the human body and not see the design is simply being dishonest. When you start to understand how complex one single strand of DNA is, to say it developed without a creator is about a billion times more absurd than saying the computer you are typing on made itself from nothing.
The Big Patio Party. It got a little out of hand.I have no idea what was before the BB.
I'm talking about what Atheists and agnostics have told me. Or do a two-second search on your computer and you will find plenty of articles with claims like:Really? Quote and link a scientist that says that.
Because no reputable cosmologist, including Georges Lemaitre, the originator of Big Bang theory, says the universe came from nothing.No one has yet explained how it's a strawman.
I'm glad you brought up a testable hyposthesis since all their tests at creating life have failed, therefore what we have about origins is pure speculation and not science at all.No, I am sorry, but "look at the trees" is not evidence. You are making a logical fallacy known as an Argument From Ignorance.
To have evidence in the sciences one must have a testable hypothesis first. What reasonable test, one that relies on the merits of your concept only, could possibly refute it? If you do not have a testable hypothesis for intelligent design you do not have evidence for intelligent design.
So, what came first, the energy or the bang? And how do you get energy with no energy source? All you can do is run in circles unless you have a first cause explanation.Because no reputable cosmologist, including Georges Lemaitre, the originator of Big Bang theory, says the universe came from nothing.
Some guy on the internet writing a non-scientific explanation of big bang theory for laymen.I'm talking about what Atheists and agnostics have told me. Or do a two-second search on your computer and you will find plenty of articles with claims like:
"The Big Bang is a theory describing the expansion of our Universe from a point of origin roughly 13.8 billion years ago.
This hypothetical starting point of everything was an infinite concentration of energy referred to as a singularity. If you find this hard to picture, don't worry. You're not alone. Physical laws don't deal well with infinite numbers, meaning concepts such as space, time, and a bunch of different forces don't mean a great deal in this tiny 'egg' from which the Universe hatched.
Never said he was and it's irrelevant to the discussion. Perhaps we could just admit that scientists actually don't have a clue as to what started it all.Some guy on the internet writing a non-scientific explanation of big bang theory for laymen.
BTW, the originator of the Big Bang theory was not an atheist. I don't know if you would consider him a "real" Christian or not because he was a devout Roman Catholic, but you would be hard-pressed to prove he was an atheist.
There was no "bang," it was an expansion. "Big bang" was a derisive nickname coined by a disgruntled steady-statist which caught on in the popular press. No one knows where the energy came from.So, what came first, the energy or the bang? And how do you get energy with no energy source? All you can do is run in circles unless you have a first cause explanation.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?