So, you still haven't read the article, and you still don't really know what we're talking about. Civilwar, do you think it is appropriate to engage me in conversation about something you do not understand?If you want to stake your belief system on a false dichotomy.....be my guest. To believe there is no alternative except to what you believe seems to me to be constrictive thought processes that are not willing or able to seriously consider other possibilities that create challenges and/or disrupt belief systems.
Again, all you're showing is that you don't understand the significance of a hypothetical scenario. You said it was impossible to prove a negative. I showed that it was.And there is the flaw; when confronted with contradictory evidence of that 'I can't see the room' (which is true) you switch to the 'but if' scenario to construct a 'winning' argument.
But the "indwelling of the holy spirit" is nothing more than a feeling. Or, if I am wrong and it is something more, please feel free to demonstrate. Right now, it seems to me like all it is is a person feeling a really, really strong certainty that their idea is correct. If it's more than that, please explain.And you demonstrate that you do not understand the difference between feelings and experiences...not surprising.
You have played the game and lost it.Well, we have played your game long enough. Are you willing to play the game according to the same rules?
Do I understand you to say that you think there is a way of proving that it is impossible for "God" to exist? If so, I do not know what it is. Do you feel that my admitting that I cannot disprove God is in some way evidence that He does exist?So, what evidence has convinced you that God does not exist? Not what others have written, which are just opinions or what others have said which are also just opinions. Evidence that you yourself have seen/witnessed/personally experienced that convinces you that God does not exist?
Upvote
0