Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!
The manner in which MAGA supporters want President Trump to use executive orders to overturn long-established practices suggests that they believe there will not be another election.
Tax payers are not paying for the Democratic Party. Hyperbole does not prove your point at all.
Maybe it would be easier foe the next president's executive order to just be, like "I decree that thr last 4 years of EOs are gonzo"
just another diversion which will be thrown out in courtThey have continued pushing false narratives, especially about the Trump Administration. Just this week, NPR, citing two anonymous sources, reported that two DOGE workers gained accounts on classified networks, used by the National Security Administration and the Department of Energy, and accessed nuclear secrets.
“This reporting is false. No DOGE personnel have accessed these NNSA systems. The two DOGE individuals in question worked within the agency for several days and departed DOE in February,” a Department of Energy spokesperson told NPR.
BREAKING: President Trump Signs "Ending Taxpayer Subsidization of Biased Media" Executive Order to Defund NPR and PBS | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson
BREAKING: @POTUS just signed an executive order ENDING the taxpayer subsidization of NPR and PBS — which receive millions from taxpayers to spread radical, woke propaganda disguised as “news.”www.thegatewaypundit.com
There is no reason for the U.S. taxpayer to fund such biased "news" networks.
The *propaganda* about his "persecution" certainly helped convince his voters to stick with him (or come back to him).
They already do this. Here is one from Trump doing just that:
There will be a lot to fix.
All but Biden have had more than Trump last time and at this point this time.
I don't think we are supporting EOs on their face. Eos work well for policy changes in the executive. You can't run tye executive on laws created by congress that deal with policies. And as with any organization policies can be changed with new CEOs.
Some one who isn't a federal judge should let Trump know that.
Do you agree with all 145 executive orders signed by President Trump and believe they do not require congressional approval?
I don't know if I agree with all them or not. I haven't read them all.
Your description misconstrues the NPR report. First as to it's veracity, "In a statement sent to NPR, the Department of Energy initially denied the entire story. But in a second statement sent hours later, they acknowledged that the two DOGE employees did, in fact, have accounts on these networks." the NPR report also stated that "So there's no evidence that the two DOGE employees had access to restricted data on nuclear weapons." So, when you say that NPR, reported that two DOGE workers gained accounts on classified networks, used by the National Security Administration and the Department of Energy, and accessed nuclear secrets, that's half true and half untrue. The report did say they had gained accounts on the classified networks, a fact that the DOJ finally confirmed. And the second part, the fact that the report says that they accessed nuclear secrets, is untrue. As I noted the report said exactly the opposite, that , "there's no evidence that the two DOGE employees had access to restricted data on nuclear weapons.". We must be diligent to read articles before reporting on what they say. I don't know where you got your facts but I quoted the article itself and this is what it said. As it turns out what they reported was truthful and based on that you conclude that the network is biased? It seems that the administration is targeting anyone who questions their actions or rhetoric as biased but in this case they were reporting truthfully.
While NPR gets a pretty small percentage of its budget directly from the CPB, local radio stations frequently get a large chunk of their revenue from the CPB - up to 50% in some rural areas - and some of those funds are used to license programming from NPR.
Not at all. Neither did it suggest that Democrats believed there would not be another election when Joe issued all of those executive orders.
