durangodawood
Dis Member
- Aug 28, 2007
- 23,591
- 15,751
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Seeker
- Marital Status
- Single
No. I said you have to list every one you refuse.like a sign that says "whites only" ?
Upvote
0
No. I said you have to list every one you refuse.like a sign that says "whites only" ?
If he doesn't make transgender coming out cakes for everybody then he is in trouble.Does he make similar cakes for other people, or is the problem with the person's gender identity? Because if its the latter, it's probably in violation of the law and not protected speech.
If he doesn't make transgender coming out cakes for everybody then he is in trouble.
Here’s the decision itself.
The bakery would have made the cake as specified right up the time Ms. Scardina told them why she wanted it made like this:
“Mrs. Phillips confirmed that the Bakery would have made a pink cake with blue frosting if Ms. Scardina had not then shared her protected status and the meaning of the colors to her. Only after Mrs. Phillips stated that the Bakery could make the requested item did Ms. Scardina then share that she had chosen those colors to reflect and celebrate her transition from a male to a female.”
If there is a checkmate, then by definition there was goading to lead to it, as admits a strategy to force that outcome. Right? But I've not goaded.
When homosexualist push their propaganda through kids shows or through 'model policies' in the department of education, they hurt kids.
When they do drag, parade in front of children, or otherwise exhibit perversity in front of children, they hurt kids.
Whatever may be said of errant perverse married couples, they aren't pushing for institutionalized child sex abuse like what forms a bulk of homosexualist political action. So, the rates are very high at that level.
It is the point of the law itself to uphold universal morality and if not the law is divided against itself. The majority is influenced, especially by state or corporate sponsored propaganda, and a majority under such influence is not exempt from morality.
I think the animus against someone because of gender identity would be if he would sell a pink and blue transgender coming out cake to anyone but a transgender person.The customer asked for a birthday cake that happens to be pink and blue. He doesn't seem incapable of making one, so it's hard not to conclude there is animus against someone because of their gender identity.
Suppose you were refused service because you're single. The business required you to be married before you could buy there, Would you still say that it's up to him/her whom they do business with?