as iv pointed out to you before .. go read the testimony of "Surpise Sithole ".. you can google it .. then you can contact him personally and ask him if you wish . he has often experienced preaching to people who could not understand him and suddenly his speech changed and he fund himself speaking perfectly in their language .. .. the very thing you say ceased ..is still happening now in this day and age when that TYPE of the gift is required .
of course you then said .oh thats 2nd hand testimony and you dont believe it ...
so what to be done .. i direct you to that man himself so that it wil not be 2nd hand testimony .
personally i speak in tongues a number of differing kinds .
have had visions occur
have had devils cast out and seen it often in doing it
have seen people come up out of water baptism and instantly speak another tongue as they do
experienced many healings
have had words of knowledge telling me things about a person i'm witnessing to which i could not know
and many other things
but what is to be done in your case ?
....... we testify to what we have seen, and yet you people do not accept our testimony.
Do you think I'm going to believe a fanciful unproven story from someone I've never of heard of in some dark corner of the internet? Show me some scientifically proven evidence that has been independently verified that somebody fluently spoke a language they never learned, rather than pentecostal hearsay. Then I might believe it. If was proven it would make front page news in scientific and academic journals around the world.
Professional linguists have been studying Pentecostal tongues for decades. Hundreds of samples of tongues have been analysed and all have proved to devoid of any syntax or linguistic structure. They have not found a single example of a genuine language being spoken. The most respected is by Dr. William Samarin of the University of Toronto who did a 10 year study of Pentecostal tongues. Here are some excerpts from his study:
"There is no mystery about glossolalia. Tape recorded samples are easy to obtain and to analyze. They always turn out to be the same things: strings of syllables made up of sounds taken from among all those that the speaker knows, put together more or less haphazardly but which nevertheless emerge as word-like or sentence-like units”
"The speaker controls the rhythm, volume, speed and inflection of his speech so that the sounds emerge as pseudo- language -- in the form of words and sentences. Glossolalia is language-like because the speaker unconsciously wants it to be language-like. Yet in spite of superficial similarities, glossolalia fundamentally is not language.”
"All specimens of glossolalia that have ever been studied have produced no features that would even suggest that they reflect some kind of communicative system.”
"When the full apparatus of linguistic science comes to bear on glossolalia, this turns out to be only a facade of language; although at times a very good one indeed. For when we comprehend what language is, we must conclude that no glossa, no matter how well constructed, is a specimen of human language, because it is neither internally organized nor systematically related to the world man perceives."
"...a meaningless but phonologically structured human utterance believed by the speaker to be a real language but bearing no systematic resemblance to any natural language, living or dead."
“And it has already been established that no special power needs to take over a person's vocal organs; all of us are equipped with everything we need to produce glossolalia”
"Glossolalia is not a supernatural phenomenon....It is similar to many other kinds of speech humans produce in more or less normal circumstances, in more or less normal psychological states. In fact, anybody can produce glossolalia if he is uninhibited and if he discovers what the "trick" is"
"The speaker controls the rhythm, volume, speed and inflection of his speech so that the sounds emerge as pseudo- language -- in the form of words and sentences. Glossolalia is language-like because the speaker unconsciously wants it to be language-like. Yet in spite of superficial similarities, glossolalia fundamentally is not language.”
"All specimens of glossolalia that have ever been studied have produced no features that would even suggest that they reflect some kind of communicative system.”
"When the full apparatus of linguistic science comes to bear on glossolalia, this turns out to be only a facade of language; although at times a very good one indeed. For when we comprehend what language is, we must conclude that no glossa, no matter how well constructed, is a specimen of human language, because it is neither internally organized nor systematically related to the world man perceives."
"...a meaningless but phonologically structured human utterance believed by the speaker to be a real language but bearing no systematic resemblance to any natural language, living or dead."
“And it has already been established that no special power needs to take over a person's vocal organs; all of us are equipped with everything we need to produce glossolalia”
"Glossolalia is not a supernatural phenomenon....It is similar to many other kinds of speech humans produce in more or less normal circumstances, in more or less normal psychological states. In fact, anybody can produce glossolalia if he is uninhibited and if he discovers what the "trick" is"
Upvote
0