Soyeong
Well-Known Member
- Mar 10, 2015
- 12,433
- 4,605
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Single
Correct that is why God’s Law (10 commandments) are the standard in the Old and New Covenants (Stone and Heart) and the judgement to come. The requirement for holiness has not changed. The 10 commandments are the standard of Holiness and a requirement in both the Old and New Covenants and the standard of the judgement to come (James 2:8-12).
The ceremonial laws are essentially God's instructions for how to have a holy conduct, such as Leviticus 11:44-45, so they are the standard of holiness. Is it really your position that God's commands to observe his holy days had nothing to do with holiness?
Good! Do not disagree and the same is also argued in Posts 1-4 of this OP. So what is your point as this is what is highlighted in posts 1-4 of the OP?
My point is that you are misunderstanding that verse as saying that cross was used as a means of disposing of outdated ceremonial laws. You error is that when you see the word "law" you think about just the Ten Commandments when the people would have understood it as referring to all of God's laws.
Who is saying God’s Law (10 commandments) ended at the cross? Not me. It was the ceremonial laws of Moses pointing to the plan of salvation in Jesus and our sins that were nailed to the cross (Col 2:14-17). For in depth discussion see the thread COL 2:14-17 THE REAL TRUTH! PARTS 1-4 (linked)
I am not sure what you are saying or the point you are making so far as I generally agree with what you have posted here unless you are implying you need to keep the ceremonial laws of Moses (e.g. animal sacrifices etc)?
God's Law is inclusive of everything that He commanded through Moses, so when you speak against obeying the ceremonial laws, you are speaking against obeying God's Law. Even when the Law was given to Moses, there was not a single law that everyone was required to obey, and not even Jesus was able to obey the laws in regard to giving birth or to a woman's period. So some of the laws were only for the King, the High Priest, priests, judges, men, women, children, widows, people living in the land, strangers living among them, and for everyone. Many of the laws also have further conditions under which they apply, such as traffic laws that only apply during certain hours or the command to keep the Sabbath that only applies when it is the 7th day. So if there is nothing wrong with not keeping the Sabbath when it is a Tuesday, then there is nothing wrong not keeping laws in regard to temple practice when there is not a temple in which to practice them. The condition for the Israelites who were in exile in Babylon to return was for them to obey God's Law, which required having access to a temple that they didn't have while in exile, so God counted them doing what they could do as full obedience. So there is a difference between doing away with a law and saying that the conditions under which it applies are not met.
In Acts 18:18, Paul took a Nazarite vow which involved making offerings (Numbers 6) and in Acts 21:20-24, Paul was on his way to pay the expenses for others who had taken a similar vow in order to disprove false rumors that he was teaching against the Law and to show that he still continued to live in obedience to it. This is quite clearly referring to more than just the Ten Commandments. So offerings did not stop with the death and resurrection of Messiah, but only stopped with the destruction of the temple. However, the Bible prophecies a time when the third and fourth temple will be built and when offerings will resume (Ezekiel 44-46).
Upvote
0