The Great Tribulation

What is the Great Tribulation?

  • 66 AD Jewish Revolt to 70 AD Destruction of Jerusalem

  • Yet To Be Fulfilled

  • Both


Results are only viewable after voting.

random person

1 COR. 10:11; HEB. 1:2; HEB. 9:26,28; 1 PET. 1:20
Dec 10, 2013
3,646
262
Riverside California
✟14,087.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Matthew 24:9

Then they will deliver you to tribulation, and will kill you, and you will be hated by all nations because of My name.

John 16:33

These things I have spoken to you, so that in Me you may have peace. In the world you have tribulation, but take courage; I have overcome the world.

Acts 14:22

strengthening the souls of the disciples, encouraging them to continue in the faith, and saying, “Through many tribulations we must enter the kingdom of God.”

Romans 5:3

And not only this, but we also exult in our tribulations, knowing that tribulation brings about perseverance;

Romans 8:35

Who will separate us from the love of Christ? Will tribulation, or distress, or persecution, or famine, or nakedness, or peril, or sword?

Romans 12:12

rejoicing in hope, persevering in tribulation, devoted to prayer,

Ephesians 3:13

Therefore I ask you not to lose heart at my tribulations on your behalf, for they are your glory.

1 Thessalonians 1:6

You also became imitators of us and of the Lord, having received the word in much tribulation with the joy of the Holy Spirit,

Hebrews 10:33

partly by being made a public spectacle through reproaches and tribulations, and partly by becoming sharers with those who were so treated.
 
Upvote 0

random person

1 COR. 10:11; HEB. 1:2; HEB. 9:26,28; 1 PET. 1:20
Dec 10, 2013
3,646
262
Riverside California
✟14,087.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
One question for the Christians that believe the Tribulation is a future event...

Do you believe Christians have experienced tribulations throughout history?

What about today?

Right at this exact moment as I write this?
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,620
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,967.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
One question for the Christians that believe the Tribulation is a future event...

Do you believe Christians have experienced tribulations throughout history?

What about today?

Right at this exact moment as I write this?

Non sequitur



Lamad
 
Upvote 0
J

Johnny Appleseed

Guest
Mat 24:21 For then shall be great tribulation (Acts 1;6; Rev 3:10; Jer 30:7), such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
In six different verses this period is referred to as either 3½ years, 42 months or 1260 days (Dan 9:27; Dan 7:25; Rev 12:14; Rev 11:2; Rev 13:5; Rev 11:3).
The colossal scenes of the Revelation, beginning with Chapter 5 and the opening of the seven-sealed book, through Chapter 10 (Seals through Trumpets), form a prelude to worldwide commotion prior to the Great Tribulation itself described in Rev Chap 11-18. The Great Tribulation is identical with the last three and one-half years of Daniel's seventieth week of years (Dan 9:24-27; Rev 11;2-3). Unger's Bible Dictionary.
To date timeline start if 2017 is the Day of the Trumpet, then it would be in April of 2014.

Psalm 2 gives a good outline of this time period. Nations raging (v.2), derision of Jehovah (v. 4). It eventuates in the establishment of the rejected King in Zion 2:6) and the subjugation of the earth to the King's millennial rule (vv. 7-9), with a present appeal to Gentile world powers to be warned by the certainty of the establishment of Christ's kingdom (vv. 10-12). According to Rev 13-19, there will be the cruel reign of the "beast coming up out of the sea" (The Antichrist) (13:1) who, breaking his covenant with the Jews (2 Thess 2:4), will demand divine worship. This earth ruler, the Beast, is empowered by Satan, and the entire terrific episode of fighting God is made possible by the unprecedented activity of demons (Rev 9:1-11; 16:13-16).
The character of the period is clearly revealed in Scipture. It is a time of "wrath" (Zeph 1:15-18; I Thess 1:10; 5:9; Rev 6:16-17; 11:18; 14:10, 19; 15:1, 7; 19:2); indignation" (Isa 26:20-21; 34:1-3); "trial" (Rev 3:10); "trouble" (Jer 30:7; Zeph 1:14-15; Dan 12:1); "destruction" (Joel 1:15; I Thess 5:3); "darkness" (Joel 2:2; Amos 5:18; Zeph 1:14-18); "desolation" (Dan 9:27; Zeph 1:14-15); "overturning" (Isa 24:1-4, 19-21); "punishment" (Isa 24:20-21).
God will pour out judgment upon believing men and nations (Rev 3:10; Jer 25:32-33; Isa 24:1; II Thess 2:10). These judgments will fall both directly from God and indirectly through men and armies.
The nations proceeding out of the Roman Empire will be federated into a world power again (Dan 2 and &; Rev 17:12, 16-17). The head of the empire is known as the little horn (Dan 7:8), the Abomination of Desolation (Matt 24:15), the man of sin (II Thess 2:3), the Antichrist (I Jn 2:18), and the beast (Rev 13:1-10). This political ruler will make a covenant with Israel (Dan 9:27). The King of the North, also known as Gog (Ezk 38), will oppose him (Dan 11:40) but will be destroyed by the Lord upon invading Palestine (Ezk 39). With that strong power removed, the Antichrist will be able to control world government. A great religious system, centering in the worship of this political figure, will be promoted by the false prophet (Rev 13:11-18) which will become worldwide. At the return of Christ this politico-religious system will be destroyed (Rev 19:20).
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,620
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,967.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Mat 24:21 For then shall be great tribulation (Acts 1;6; Rev 3:10; Jer 30:7), such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.
In six different verses this period is referred to as either 3½ years, 42 months or 1260 days (Dan 9:27; Dan 7:25; Rev 12:14; Rev 11:2; Rev 13:5; Rev 11:3).
The colossal scenes of the Revelation, beginning with Chapter 5 and the opening of the seven-sealed book, through Chapter 10 (Seals through Trumpets), form a prelude to worldwide commotion prior to the Great Tribulation itself described in Rev Chap 11-18. The Great Tribulation is identical with the last three and one-half years of Daniel's seventieth week of years (Dan 9:24-27; Rev 11;2-3). Unger's Bible Dictionary.
To date timeline start if 2017 is the Day of the Trumpet, then it would be in April of 2014.

Psalm 2 gives a good outline of this time period. Nations raging (v.2), derision of Jehovah (v. 4). It eventuates in the establishment of the rejected King in Zion 2:6) and the subjugation of the earth to the King's millennial rule (vv. 7-9), with a present appeal to Gentile world powers to be warned by the certainty of the establishment of Christ's kingdom (vv. 10-12). According to Rev 13-19, there will be the cruel reign of the "beast coming up out of the sea" (The Antichrist) (13:1) who, breaking his covenant with the Jews (2 Thess 2:4), will demand divine worship. This earth ruler, the Beast, is empowered by Satan, and the entire terrific episode of fighting God is made possible by the unprecedented activity of demons (Rev 9:1-11; 16:13-16).
The character of the period is clearly revealed in Scipture. It is a time of "wrath" (Zeph 1:15-18; I Thess 1:10; 5:9; Rev 6:16-17; 11:18; 14:10, 19; 15:1, 7; 19:2); indignation" (Isa 26:20-21; 34:1-3); "trial" (Rev 3:10); "trouble" (Jer 30:7; Zeph 1:14-15; Dan 12:1); "destruction" (Joel 1:15; I Thess 5:3); "darkness" (Joel 2:2; Amos 5:18; Zeph 1:14-18); "desolation" (Dan 9:27; Zeph 1:14-15); "overturning" (Isa 24:1-4, 19-21); "punishment" (Isa 24:20-21).
God will pour out judgment upon believing men and nations (Rev 3:10; Jer 25:32-33; Isa 24:1; II Thess 2:10). These judgments will fall both directly from God and indirectly through men and armies.
The nations proceeding out of the Roman Empire will be federated into a world power again (Dan 2 and &; Rev 17:12, 16-17). The head of the empire is known as the little horn (Dan 7:8), the Abomination of Desolation (Matt 24:15), the man of sin (II Thess 2:3), the Antichrist (I Jn 2:18), and the beast (Rev 13:1-10). This political ruler will make a covenant with Israel (Dan 9:27). The King of the North, also known as Gog (Ezk 38), will oppose him (Dan 11:40) but will be destroyed by the Lord upon invading Palestine (Ezk 39). With that strong power removed, the Antichrist will be able to control world government. A great religious system, centering in the worship of this political figure, will be promoted by the false prophet (Rev 13:11-18) which will become worldwide. At the return of Christ this politico-religious system will be destroyed (Rev 19:20).

I disagree: the last half of the 70th week will be 1260 days, or 42 months, but NOT THE DAYS OF great tribulation. Perhaps they could have been the full 42 months of the Beast's time of authority, but God said He would SHORTEN those days. They are shortened by the vials and associated plagues. We don't know exactly WHEN those vials will be poured out, so we don't know exactly how many days the great tribulation will continue. All we know is they will be somewhat shorter than 42 months.

LAMAD
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,620
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,967.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
We old guys might even understand each other, some day!


I have been thinking about Rome lately....I wonder why? :thumbsup:

I understand the last beast of Daniel chapter 7 is ROME. But it is also a KING.

Well, all the other empires were destroyed or taken out by a new empire, all except Rome. Rome just got weaker and weaker, and finally split into the Western Rome and Eastern Rome, with Constantinople as its capital.

Daniel 7 does say that the ten horns are ten kings from this beast, but they could be from either the Eastern or Western half, or some from each. But the 11th horn that came up took down three of the others. In my mind, this 11th horn can be none other than the Beast of Rev. 11. Also in my mind, all ten of these are from the Eastern leg of Rome.

Any thoughts?

LAMAD







 
Upvote 0

random person

1 COR. 10:11; HEB. 1:2; HEB. 9:26,28; 1 PET. 1:20
Dec 10, 2013
3,646
262
Riverside California
✟14,087.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat


Well you're American, and I guess oblivious to the sufferings of your brothers and sisters under communism, Islamic regimes, etc.

The extreme persecutions, tortures, imprisonments, and martyrdoms Christians face daily around the globe.

Well they have already entered their great tribulation or is it they don't qualify because of our relatively rosy and safe existances in predominately Christian western nations?
 
Upvote 0
B

Bible2

Guest
iamlamad said in post 65:

I disagree: the last half of the 70th week will be 1260 days, or 42 months, but NOT THE DAYS OF great tribulation. Perhaps they could have been the full 42 months of the Beast's time of authority, but God said He would SHORTEN those days. They are shortened by the vials and associated plagues. We don't know exactly WHEN those vials will be poured out, so we don't know exactly how many days the great tribulation will continue. All we know is they will be somewhat shorter than 42 months.

Mark 13:20 can mean that all flesh on the earth would die if the Lord hadn't already shortened, as in "he hath shortened" (Mark 13:20b), the number of days of the future tribulation of Revelation chapters 6 to 18, Matthew 24, and Mark 13. The Lord could have already determined, from the beginning of Creation (cf. Isaiah 46:10), that he will return on the 1,335th day after the abomination of desolation (possibly a standing, android image of the Antichrist) is set up in the holy place (the inner sanctum) of a 3rd Jewish temple (Matthew 24:15, Daniel 12:11-12, Revelation 16:15). And the Lord will return "immediately after the tribulation" (Matthew 24:29-31), immediately after its final event, the worldwide destruction during the 7th vial (Revelation 16:19, Revelation 19:2 to 20:6). So Mark 13:20 can mean that if the Lord hadn't shortened the number of days of the tribulation, then all flesh on the earth would die during the 7th vial's aftermath, which could be a nuclear-winter scenario (which the Lord will miraculously prevent at his return) brought on by the 10 kings of the Antichrist's empire nuking the cities of the earth at the 7th vial (Revelation 17:16-17a, Revelation 16:19).
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
I have been thinking about Rome lately....I wonder why? :thumbsup:

I understand the last beast of Daniel chapter 7 is ROME. But it is also a KING.

Well, all the other empires were destroyed or taken out by a new empire, all except Rome. Rome just got weaker and weaker, and finally split into the Western Rome and Eastern Rome, with Constantinople as its capital.

Daniel 7 does say that the ten horns are ten kings from this beast, but they could be from either the Eastern or Western half, or some from each. But the 11th horn that came up took down three of the others. In my mind, this 11th horn can be none other than the Beast of Rev. 11. Also in my mind, all ten of these are from the Eastern leg of Rome.

Any thoughts?

LAMAD







I agree that the eleventh horn is "the Beast." You might be interested in this comment, written by Jerome on the fifth century.

"We should therefore concur with the traditional interpretation of all the commentators of the Christian Church, that at the end of the world, when the Roman Empire is to be destroyed, there shall be ten kings who will partition the Roman world amongst themselves. Then an insignificant eleventh king will arise, who will overcome three of the ten kings... Then after they have been slain, the seven other kings will bow their necks to the victor." (Jerome’s comments on Daniel 7:8, as found in “Jerome’s Commentary on Daniel,” pg. 77, translated by Gleason L. Archer, Jr., published by Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, 1958.)
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,620
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,967.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Well you're American, and I guess oblivious to the sufferings of your brothers and sisters under communism, Islamic regimes, etc.

The extreme persecutions, tortures, imprisonments, and martyrdoms Christians face daily around the globe.

Well they have already entered their great tribulation or is it they don't qualify because of our relatively rosy and safe existances in predominately Christian western nations?

You had originally written:
One question for the Christians that believe the Tribulation is a future event...

I can only assume by "the tribulation" you mean the days of "great tribulation" Jesus spoke of. And in that case, "those days" (Matt. 24) have simply NOT ARRIVED yet. There has been "tribulation" all through history, because Satan became the god of this world by usurping Adam's lease when he sinned, and Satan HATES all people, but especially God's people. I was right in writing "Non sequitur." There is a HUGE difference in the tribulations of the past and what is coming: Jesus said those days will be WORSE than any other time in history, before or after. And they will begin at the midpoint of Daniel's 70th week.

So are you going to turn the book of Revelation into nonsense as many others on this forum, by saying it is all history? NONE of the Trumpet judgments have arrived yet, and so NONE of the vials have been poured out. These events are in our future - NEAR future. "Those days" of "great tribulation" spoken of by Jesus will NOT ARRIVE until the SECOND HALF of the future 70th week.

LAMAD
 
Upvote 0

iamlamad

Lamad
Jun 8, 2013
9,620
744
78
Home in Tulsa
✟101,967.00
Country
United States
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
I agree that the eleventh horn is "the Beast." You might be interested in this comment, written by Jerome on the fifth century.

"We should therefore concur with the traditional interpretation of all the commentators of the Christian Church, that at the end of the world, when the Roman Empire is to be destroyed, there shall be ten kings who will partition the Roman world amongst themselves. Then an insignificant eleventh king will arise, who will overcome three of the ten kings... Then after they have been slain, the seven other kings will bow their necks to the victor." (Jerome’s comments on Daniel 7:8, as found in “Jerome’s Commentary on Daniel,” pg. 77, translated by Gleason L. Archer, Jr., published by Baker Book House, Grand Rapids, 1958.)

Good. Something we can agree on! :thumbsup:

I see Daniel chapter 2 as a two fold prophecy; first as the linear history from Babylon to the end, and then as a picture of geography at the end, very close to what we see today, but STILL involving the land areas of Babylon, MedoPersia, Greece, and finally Rome. If we compare maps of these ancient empires, we see Babylon did not reach north to either the Black Sea or Caspian Sea, but did reach down, in a narrow band, to the Persian Gulf, and down to the Red Sea and a narrow band south along the Nile, so did not include Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, or much of Egypt.

When the Persians took over, their map extends north to surround the southern half of the Black Sea, the Caspian Sea and northeast to the Aral Sea and even as far east as to include Pakistan, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and it seems even Tajikistan. NO OTHER of these empires went this far east. They also included Georgia and Azerbaijan between the two seas, and Bulgaria and Greece.

The Greecian Empire lost the 'Stan countries to the northeast, but added some of north Africa. The Roman Empire added much of Europe, but did not go much farther east then Israel, so lost Iraq, Iran, and all the 'Stan nations to the East.

I am CONVINCED that Iraq and Iran and the other 'Stan nations, all Muslim nations, will have a part in the end times. Therefore, the end times map cannot be Rome alone, by itself, because it leaves out Babylon or Iraq of today. This is why I believe, when John said "The seven heads are seven mountains" and "there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come," it is not speaking of Rome, but the seven ancient empires that at one time controlled Israel as a nation. Egypt would be left out of this, but Assyria should be included. The five fallen then, would be Assyria, Babylon, Median, Persian, and Greece, with Rome current with John, and Hitler and Germany as the one to come, but only for a short time. These are the seven. The eighth, as the Beast, comes later. Some people add Egypt as the first, and put Median and Persia together, But was there ever a time that Egypt controlled Israel once they were a nation?

Just my thoughts,

LAMAD
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

interpreter

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2004
6,309
157
77
Texas
✟7,377.00
Faith
Anglican
You had originally written:
One question for the Christians that believe the Tribulation is a future event...

I can only assume by "the tribulation" you mean the days of "great tribulation" Jesus spoke of. And in that case, "those days" (Matt. 24) have simply NOT ARRIVED yet. There has been "tribulation" all through history, because Satan became the god of this world by usurping Adam's lease when he sinned, and Satan HATES all people, but especially God's people. I was right in writing "Non sequitur." There is a HUGE difference in the tribulations of the past and what is coming: Jesus said those days will be WORSE than any other time in history, before or after. And they will begin at the midpoint of Daniel's 70th week.

So are you going to turn the book of Revelation into nonsense as many others on this forum, by saying it is all history? NONE of the Trumpet judgments have arrived yet, and so NONE of the vials have been poured out. These events are in our future - NEAR future. "Those days" of "great tribulation" spoken of by Jesus will NOT ARRIVE until the SECOND HALF of the future 70th week.

LAMAD
The fact that the 7 last plagues are now being poured out is proof that the great tribulation is behind us. 2013 was the 4th hottest year on record (see Rev. 16:8-9).
 
Upvote 0

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Good. Something we can agree on! :thumbsup:

I see Daniel chapter 2 as a two fold prophecy; first as the linear history from Babylon to the end, and then as a picture of geography at the end, very close to what we see today, but STILL involving the land areas of Babylon, MedoPersia, Greece, and finally Rome. If we compare maps of these ancient empires, we see Babylon did not reach north to either the Black Sea or Caspian Sea, but did reach down, in a narrow band, to the Persian Gulf, and down to the Red Sea and a narrow band south along the Nile, so did not include Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, or much of Egypt.

When the Persians took over, their map extends north to surround the southern half of the Black Sea, the Caspian Sea and northeast to the Aral Sea and even as far east as to include Pakistan, Afghanistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and it seems even Tajikistan. NO OTHER of these empires went this far east. They also included Georgia and Azerbaijan between the two seas, and Bulgaria and Greece.

The Greecian Empire lost the 'Stan countries to the northeast, but added some of north Africa. The Roman Empire added much of Europe, but did not go much farther east then Israel, so lost Iraq, Iran, and all the 'Stan nations to the East.

I am CONVINCED that Iraq and Iran and the other 'Stan nations, all Muslim nations, will have a part in the end times. Therefore, the end times map cannot be Rome alone, by itself, because it leaves out Babylon or Iraq of today. This is why I believe, when John said "The seven heads are seven mountains" and "there are seven kings: five are fallen, and one is, and the other is not yet come," it is not speaking of Rome, but the seven ancient empires that at one time controlled Israel as a nation. Egypt would be left out of this, but Assyria should be included. The five fallen then, would be Assyria, Babylon, Median, Persian, and Greece, with Rome current with John, and Hitler and Germany as the one to come, but only for a short time. These are the seven. The eighth, as the Beast, comes later. Some people add Egypt as the first, and put Median and Persia together, But was there ever a time that Egypt controlled Israel once they were a nation?

Just my thoughts,

LAMAD

I, too, am absolutely certain that the eastern nations of this area will play a great part in the end times. But not as part of the kingdom of "the beast," but as part of the kingdom of "the Assyrian," "the king of the north."

In Daniel 11:40 "the king of the south" and "the king of the north" attack "the king" at the same time. This parallels Isaiah 7, where we read:

"'The LORD will bring the king of Assyria upon you and your people and your father's house--days that have not come since the day that Ephraim departed from Judah.' And it shall come to pass in that day That the LORD will whistle for the fly That is in the farthest part of the rivers of Egypt, And for the bee that is in the land of Assyria. They will come, and all of them will rest In the desolate valleys and in the clefts of the rocks, And on all thorns and in all pastures. In the same day the Lord will shave with a hired razor, With those from beyond the River, with the king of Assyria, The head and the hair of the legs, And will also remove the beard." (Isaiah 7:17-20)

Here we see two things, first a coming attack by "the Assyrian," and second, the armies of Egypt and Assyria typified as swarms of insects, coming upon the king of Judah at the same time.


In ancient times, both Egypt and Assyria invaded Judea, but never at the same time. This is one of the reasons I conclude that "the king of the north" and "the Assyrian" represent the same end time individual. Another reason can be seen in this map, which compares the the area ruled by the ancient Selucid Empire (the king of the north) with area ruled by the more ancient Assyrian Empire. As you examome it,otice that, aside from a few sparsely inhabited areas around the edges, these two ancient empires covered the same area.

126134d1328709765-assyriamaprot.jpghttp:
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,534
4,827
57
Oregon
✟799,454.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
If that were true, then it would not be true (which it is) that almost every historian who is not a Preterist agrees that the Revelation was written during the reign of Domitian, with most selecting A.D. 94 as the most likely date.

Almost ALL??

Really??

Lets compare evidence shall we?

Here is a partial list of scholars who adhere to the early date:


  • Jay E. Adams, The Time Is at Hand (Philipsburg: 1966).
  • D.E. Aune, Revelation 1—5 (WBC, 52A; Nashville: 1997) ; Revelation 6—16 (WBC, 52B; Nashville: 1998a) ; Revelation 17—22 (WBC, 52C; Nashville: 1998b).
  • Greg L. Bahnsen, Victory in Jesus: The Bright Hope of Postmillennialism (1999).
  • Joseph R. Balyeat, Babylon - The Great City of Revelation (1991).
  • Arthur Stapylton Barnes, Christianity at Rome in the Apostolic Age (Westport: 1938), pp. 159ff.
  • R. Bauckham, The Climax of Prophecy: Studies on the Book of Revelation (Edinburgh: 1993).
  • W. Bauer, W.F. Arndt and F.W. Gingrich, A Greek—English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature (1979).
  • Ulrich R. Beeson, The Revelation (1956 PDF).
  • Albert A. Bell, Jr., "The Date of John’s Apocalypse. The Evidence of Some Roman Historians Reconsidered," New Testament Studies 25 (1979): 93-102
  • Charles Bigg, The Origins of Christianity, ed. by T. B. Strong (Oxford: 1909), pp. 30,48.
  • F.F. Bruce, New Testament History (Garden City: 1969), p.411.
  • Rudolf Bultmann (1976).
  • R. Carré, `Othon et Vitellius, deux nouveaux Néron?', in J.-M. Croisille, R. Martin and Y. Perrin (eds.), Neronia V. Néron: histoire et légende (Collection Latomus, 247; Brussels: 1999): 152-81.
  • David Chilton, Paradise Restored (Tyler, TX: 1985); and The Days of Vengeance (Ft. Worth, TX: 1987).
  • William Newton Clarke, An Outline of Christian Theology (New York: 1903).
  • Adela Yarbro Collins, The Combat Myth in the Book of Revelation (Harvard Theological Review; Harvard Dissertations in Religion, 9; (Missoula: 1976) ; Crisis and Catharsis: The Power of the Apocalypse (Philadelphia: 1984).
  • W. Gary Crampton, Biblical Hermeneutics (1986), p. 42.
  • Berry Stewart Crebs, The Seventh Angel (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1938).
  • Gary DeMar, End Times Fiction ; Last Days Madness: Obsession of the Modern Church
  • George Edmundson, The Church in Rome in the First Century (London: 1913 PDF).
  • George P. Fisher, The Beginnings of Christianity, with a View to the State of the Roman World at the Birth of Christ (New York: 1916), pp. 534ff.
  • J. Massyngberde Ford, Revelation. Anchor Bible (Garden City, NY: 1975).
  • S.J. Friesen, Twice Neokoros: Ephesus, Asia and the Cult of the Flavian Imperial Family (Religions in the Graeco-Roman World, 116; Leiden: 1993) ; Imperial Cults and the Apocalypse of John: Reading Revelation in the Ruins (New York: 2001) ; `Satan's Throne, Imperial Cults and the Social Settings of Revelation', JSNT 27 (2005): 351-73.
  • A.J.P. Garrow, Revelation (New Testament Readings; London: 1997).
  • Kenneth L. Gentry, Before Jerusalem Fell, An Exegetical and Historical Argument for a Pre-A.D. 70 Composition, (1989)
  • Robert McQueen Grant, A Historical Introduction to the New Testament (New York: Harper & Row, 1963), p. 237.
  • Samuel G. Green, A Handbook of Church History from the Apostolic Era to the Dawn of the Reformation (London: 1904), p. 64.
  • I. Head, `Mark as a Roman Document from the Year 69: Testing Martin Hengel's Thesis', JRH 28 (2004): 240-59.
  • Bernard W. Henderson, The Life and Principate of the Emperor Nero (London: Methuen, 1903).
  • M. Hengel, Studies in the Gospel of Mark ( Philadelphia: 1985).
  • David Hill, New Testament Prophecy (Atlanta: John Knox, 1979), pp. 218-219.
  • B. Kowalski, Die Rezeption des Propheten Ezechiel in der O fenbarung des Johannes (Stuttgarter Biblische Beiträge, 52; Stuttgart: Verlag Katholisches Bibelwerk, 2004).
  • P. Lampe, From Paul to Valentinus: Christians at Rome in the First Two Centuries (transl. and ed. M. Steinhauser and M.D. Johnson; London: 2003).
  • Francis Nigel Lee, Revelation and Jerusalem (Brisbane: 1985)
  • Peter J. Leithart, The Promise of His Appearing (2004 PDF)
  • J.W. Marshall, Parables of War: Reading John's Jewish Apocalypse (Studies in Christianity and Judaism, 10; Waterloo, Ont.: 2001) ; `Who's on the Throne? Revelation in the Long Year', in R.S. Boustan and A.Y. Reed (eds.), Heavenly Realms and Earthly Realities in Late Antique Religions (Cambridge: 2004): 123-41.
  • A. D. Momigliano, Cambridge Ancient History (1934).
  • Charles Herbert Morgan, et. al., Studies in the Apostolic Church (New York: 1902), pp. 210ff.
  • C. F. D. Moule, The Birth of the New Testament, 3rd ed. (New York: 1982), p. 174.56
  • Robert L. Pierce, The Rapture Cult (Signal Mtn., TN: 1986)
  • T. Randell, "Revelation" in H. D. M. Spence &Joseph S. Exell, eds., The Pulpit Cornmentary, vol. 22 (Grand Rapids: 1950).
  • James J. L. Ratton, The Apocalypse of St. John (London: 1912).
  • J. W. Roberts, The Revelation to John (Austin, TX: Sweet, 1974).
  • John A. T. Robinson, Redating the New Testament (Philadelphia: 1976).
  • G. Rojas-Flores, `The Book of Revelation and the First Years of Nero's Reign ', Bib 85 (2004): 375-92.
  • C. Rowland, The Open Heaven: A Study of Apocalyptic in Judaism and Early Christianity (New York: 1982).
  • W. Sanday (1908). Introduction to the New Testament.
  • J. J. Scott, The Apocalypse, or Revelation of S. John the Divine (London: 1909).
  • Edward Gordon Selwyn, The Christian Prophets and the Apocalypse (Cambridge: 1900); and The Authorship of the Apocalypse (1900).
  • T.B. Slater, `Dating the Apocalypse to John', Bib 84 (2003): 252-58.
  • D. Moody Smith, "A Review of John A. T. Robinson’s Redating the New Testament," Duke Diviniep School Review 42 (1977): 193-205.
  • A.G. Soeting, Auditieve aspecten van het boek Openbaring van Johannes (PhD thesis, University of Amsterdam; 2001).
  • Charles Cutler Torrey, Documents of the Primitive Church, (ch. 5); and The Apocalypse of John (New Haven: Yale, 1958).
  • Cornelis Vanderwaal, Hal Lindsey and Biblical Prophecy (Ontario: 1978); and Search the Scriptures, vol. 10 (1979).
  • J.W. Van Henten, `Nero Redivivus Demolished: The Coherence of the Nero Traditions in the Sibylline Oracles', JSP 21 (2000): 3-17.
  • G.H. Van Kooten, 'The Year of the Four Emperors and the Revelation of John' (PDF): The `pro-Neronian' Emperors Otho and Vitellius, and the Images and Colossus of Nero in Rome' (Journal for the Study of the New Testament, Vol. 30, No. 2, 205-248 (2007) ; 2005 `"Wrath Will Drip in the Plains of Macedonia": Expectations of Nero's Return in the Egyptian Sibylline Oracles (Book 5), 2 Thessalonians, and Ancient Historical Writings', in A. Hilhorst and G.H. van Kooten (eds.), The Wisdom of Egypt: Jewish, Early Christian, and Gnostic Essays in Honour of Gerard P. Luttikhuizen (Ancient Judaism and Early Christianity, 59; Leiden: E.J. Brill): 177-215.
  • Arthur Weigall, Nero: Emperor of Rome (London: Thornton Butter-worth, 1930).
  • Bernhard Weiss, A Commentary on the New Testament, trans. G. H. Schodde (NY: 1906), vol. 4.
  • A.N. Wilson, Paul: The Mind of the Apostle (1977), p. 11
  • J. Christian Wilson, `The Problem of the Domitianic Date of Revelation ', NTS 39 (1993): 587-605.
Continued.......
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,534
4,827
57
Oregon
✟799,454.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

  • Camp, Franklin.
  • Newcombe Cappe
  • W. Boyd Carpenter, The Revelation of St. John, in vol. 8 of Charles Ellicott, cd., Ellicott's Commentary on the Whole Bible (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, rep. n.d.).
  • S. Cheetham, A History of the Christian Church (London: 1894) , pp. 24ff.
  • Adam Clarke, Clarke’s Commentay on the Whole Bible.
  • Henry Cowles, The Revelation of St. John (New York: 1871).
  • Karl August Credner, Einleitung in da Neuen Testaments (1836).
  • Alpheus Crosby
  • R.W. Dale (1878)
  • Samuel Davidson, The Doctrine af the Last Things (1882); "The Book of Revelation" in John Kitto, Cyclopedia of Biblical Literature (New York: 1855); An Introduction to th Study of the New Testament ( 1851 ); Sacred Hermeneutics (Edinburgh: 1843).
  • Gary DeMar, "Last Days Madness"
  • Edmund De Pressense, The Early Years of Christianity, trans. Annie Harwood (New York: 1879), p. 441.
  • P. S. Desprez, The Apocalypse Fulfilled, 2nd ed. (London: 1855).
  • W. M. L. De Wette
  • Johann Gottfried Eichhorn, Kure Erklamng hr Offmbarung (Leipzig: 1848).
  • Dollinger, Dr.
  • Friedrich Dusterdieck, Critical and Exegetical Handbook to the Revelation of John, 3rd ed., trans. Henry E. Jacobs (New York: 1886)
  • K. A. Eckhardt, Der Id da Johannes (Berlin: 1961 ).
  • Alfred Edersheim, The Temple: Its Ministry and Services, pp. 141ff.
  • Johann Gottfried Eichhorn, Commentaries in Apocalypse (Gottingen: 1791).
  • Erbes, Die Oflenbawzg 0s Johannis (1891).
  • G. H. A. Ewald, Commentaries in Apocalypse (Gottingen: 1828).
  • Frederic W. Farrar, The Early Days of Christianity (New York: 1884).
  • Grenville O. Field, Opened Seals – Open Gates (1895).
  • Hermann Gebhardt, The Doctrine of the Apocalypse, trans. John Jefferson (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1878).
  • Gentry, Kenneth L., Jr.
  • J.C.L. Giesler (1820)
  • James Glasgow, The Apocalypse: Translated and Expounded (Edinburgh: 1872).
  • James Comper Gray, in Gray and Adams’ Bible Commentary, vol. V
  • Hugo Grotius, Annotations in Apocalypse (Paris: 1644).
  • Heinrich Ernst Ferdinand Guenke, Introduction to the New Testament (1843); and Manual of Church History, trans. W. G. T. Shedd (Boston: 1874), p. 68.
  • Henry Melville Gwatkin, Early Church History to A.D. 313, vol. 1, p. 81.
  • Hamilton, James.
  • Henry Hammond, Paraphrase and Annotation upon the N. T (London: 1653).
  • Ernest Hampden Cook
  • Harbuig (1780).
  • Hardouin (1741)
  • Johann Christoph Harenberg, Erkiarung ( 1759).
  • Friedrich Gotthold Hartwig, Apologie Der Apocalypse Wider Falschen Tadel Und Falscha (Frieberg: 1783).
  • Karl August von Hase, A History of the Christian Church, 7th cd., trans. Charles E. Blumenthal and Conway P. Wing (New York: 1878), p. 33. 54
  • Adolph Hausrath.
  • Hawk, Ray.
  • B. W. Henderson, Life and Principate of Nero, 439 f.
  • Hentenius. [secondary source]
  • Johann Gottfrieded von Herder, Das Buch von der Zukunft des Herrn, des Neuen Testaments Siegal (Rigs: 1779).
  • J. S. Herrenschneider, Tentamen Apocalypseos illustrandae (Strassburg: 1786).
  • Adolphus Hilgenfeld, Einleitung in das Neun Testaments (1875).
  • Hitzig.
  • Heinrich Julius Holtzmann, Die Offenbarrung des Johannis, in Bunsen’s Bibekoerk (Freiburg: 1891).
  • F. J. A. Hort, The Apocalypse of St. John: 1-111, (London: Macmillan, 1908); and Judaistic Christianity (London: Macmillan, 1894).
  • John Leonhard Hug, Introduction to the New Testament, trans. David Fosdick, Jr. (Andover: Gould and Newman, 1836).
  • William Hurte, A Catechetical Commentay on the New Testament (St. Louis: John Burns, 1889), pp. 502ff.55
Continued.......
 
Upvote 0

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,534
4,827
57
Oregon
✟799,454.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others

  • Camp, Franklin.
  • Newcombe Cappe
  • W. Boyd Carpenter, The Revelation of St. John, in vol. 8 of Charles Ellicott, cd., Ellicott's Commentary on the Whole Bible (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, rep. n.d.).
  • S. Cheetham, A History of the Christian Church (London: 1894) , pp. 24ff.
  • Adam Clarke, Clarke’s Commentay on the Whole Bible.
  • Henry Cowles, The Revelation of St. John (New York: 1871).
  • Karl August Credner, Einleitung in da Neuen Testaments (1836).
  • Alpheus Crosby
  • R.W. Dale (1878)
  • Samuel Davidson, The Doctrine af the Last Things (1882); "The Book of Revelation" in John Kitto, Cyclopedia of Biblical Literature (New York: 1855); An Introduction to th Study of the New Testament ( 1851 ); Sacred Hermeneutics (Edinburgh: 1843).
  • Gary DeMar, "Last Days Madness"
  • Edmund De Pressense, The Early Years of Christianity, trans. Annie Harwood (New York: 1879), p. 441.
  • P. S. Desprez, The Apocalypse Fulfilled, 2nd ed. (London: 1855).
  • W. M. L. De Wette
  • Johann Gottfried Eichhorn, Kure Erklamng hr Offmbarung (Leipzig: 1848).
  • Dollinger, Dr.
  • Friedrich Dusterdieck, Critical and Exegetical Handbook to the Revelation of John, 3rd ed., trans. Henry E. Jacobs (New York: 1886)
  • K. A. Eckhardt, Der Id da Johannes (Berlin: 1961 ).
  • Alfred Edersheim, The Temple: Its Ministry and Services, pp. 141ff.
  • Johann Gottfried Eichhorn, Commentaries in Apocalypse (Gottingen: 1791).
  • Erbes, Die Oflenbawzg 0s Johannis (1891).
  • G. H. A. Ewald, Commentaries in Apocalypse (Gottingen: 1828).
  • Frederic W. Farrar, The Early Days of Christianity (New York: 1884).
  • Grenville O. Field, Opened Seals – Open Gates (1895).
  • Hermann Gebhardt, The Doctrine of the Apocalypse, trans. John Jefferson (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1878).
  • Gentry, Kenneth L., Jr.
  • J.C.L. Giesler (1820)
  • James Glasgow, The Apocalypse: Translated and Expounded (Edinburgh: 1872).
  • James Comper Gray, in Gray and Adams’ Bible Commentary, vol. V
  • Hugo Grotius, Annotations in Apocalypse (Paris: 1644).
  • Heinrich Ernst Ferdinand Guenke, Introduction to the New Testament (1843); and Manual of Church History, trans. W. G. T. Shedd (Boston: 1874), p. 68.
  • Henry Melville Gwatkin, Early Church History to A.D. 313, vol. 1, p. 81.
  • Hamilton, James.
  • Henry Hammond, Paraphrase and Annotation upon the N. T (London: 1653).
  • Ernest Hampden Cook
  • Harbuig (1780).
  • Hardouin (1741)
  • Johann Christoph Harenberg, Erkiarung ( 1759).
  • Friedrich Gotthold Hartwig, Apologie Der Apocalypse Wider Falschen Tadel Und Falscha (Frieberg: 1783).
  • Karl August von Hase, A History of the Christian Church, 7th cd., trans. Charles E. Blumenthal and Conway P. Wing (New York: 1878), p. 33. 54
  • Adolph Hausrath.
  • Hawk, Ray.
  • B. W. Henderson, Life and Principate of Nero, 439 f.
  • Hentenius. [secondary source]
  • Johann Gottfrieded von Herder, Das Buch von der Zukunft des Herrn, des Neuen Testaments Siegal (Rigs: 1779).
  • J. S. Herrenschneider, Tentamen Apocalypseos illustrandae (Strassburg: 1786).
  • Adolphus Hilgenfeld, Einleitung in das Neun Testaments (1875).
  • Hitzig.
  • Heinrich Julius Holtzmann, Die Offenbarrung des Johannis, in Bunsen’s Bibekoerk (Freiburg: 1891).
  • F. J. A. Hort, The Apocalypse of St. John: 1-111, (London: Macmillan, 1908); and Judaistic Christianity (London: Macmillan, 1894).
  • John Leonhard Hug, Introduction to the New Testament, trans. David Fosdick, Jr. (Andover: Gould and Newman, 1836).
  • William Hurte, A Catechetical Commentay on the New Testament (St. Louis: John Burns, 1889), pp. 502ff.55
Continued.......
 
Upvote 0

parousia70

Livin' in yesterday's tomorrow
Site Supporter
Feb 24, 2002
15,534
4,827
57
Oregon
✟799,454.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Continuing.........


  • A. Immer, Hermeneutics of the New Testament, trans. A. H. Newman (Andover: Draper, 1890).
  • Theodor Keim, Rom und das Christenthum.
  • Theodor Koppe, History of Jesus of Nazareth, 2nd cd., trans. Arthur Ransom (London: William and Norgate, 1883).
  • Max Krenkel, Der Apostel Johannes (Leipzig: 1871).
  • Johann Heinrich Kurtz, Church History, 9th cd., trans. John McPherson (3 vols. in 1) (New York: Funk and Wagnalls, 1888), pp. 41ff.
  • Victor Lechler, The Apostolic and Post-Apostolic Times: Their Diversity and Union Life and Doctrine, 3rd cd., vol. 2, trans. A. J. K. Davidson, (Edinburgh: 1886), pp. 166ff.
  • John Lightfoot (1658)
  • Joseph B. Lightfoot, Biblical Essays (London: 1893).
  • Gottfried Christian Friedrich Lücke, Versuch einer vollstandigen Einleitung in die Offenbarung Johannis, (Bonn: 1852).
  • Christoph Ernst Luthardt, Die Offenbarung Johannis (Leipzig: 1861).
  • James M. Macdonald, The Life and Writings of St. John (London: 1877).
  • Frederick Denisen Maurice, Lectures on the Apocalypse, 2nd ed. (London: 1885).
  • John David Michaelis, Introduction to the New Testament, vol. 4; and Sacred Books the New Testament.
  • Charles Pettit M’Ilvaine, The Evidences of Christianity (Philadelphia: 1861).
  • Theodor Mommsen, Roman History, vol. 5.
  • John Augustus Wilhelm Neander, The History of the Planting and Training of the Christian Church by the Apostles, trans. J. E. Ryland (Philadelphia: James M. Campbell, 1844), pp. 223ff.
  • Sir Isaac Newton, Observation Upon the Prophecies of Daniel, and the Apocalypse of St. John (London: 1732).
  • Bishop Thomas Newton, Dissertation on the Prophecies (London: 1832).
  • A. Niermeyer, Over de echteid der Johanneisch Schriften (Haag: 1852).
  • Professor Nehemiah A. Nisbett
  • Alfred Plummer (1891).
  • Dean Plumptere (1877)
  • Edward Hayes Plumtree, A Popular Exposition of the Epistles to the Seven Churches of Asia, 2nd ed. (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1879).
  • Ernest Renan, L’Antechrist (Paris: 1871).
  • Eduard Wilhelm Eugen Reuss, History of the Sacred Scriptures of the New Testament (Edinburgh: T. &T. Clark, 1884).
  • Jean Reville, Reu. d. d. Mondes (Oct., 1863 and Dec., 1873).
  • Edward Robinson, Bibliotheca Sacra, vol. 3 (1843), pp. 532ff.
  • J. Stuart Russell, The Parousia (1878).
  • Salmon, G. Introduction to the New Testament.
  • Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, 3rd cd., vol. 1: Apostolic Christianity (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, [1910] 1950), p. 834.
  • Johann Friedrich Schleusner.
  • J. H. Scholten, de Apostel Johannis in Klein Azie (Leiden: 1871).
  • Albert Schwegler, Da Nachapostol Zeitalter (1846).
  • Henry C. Sheldon, The Early Church, vol. 1 of History of the Christian Church (New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1894), pp. 112ff.
  • William Henry Simcox, The Revelation of St. John Divine. The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges (Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1893).
  • Arthur Penrhyn Stanley, Sermons and Essays on the Apostolic Age (3rd ed: Oxford and London: 1874), pp. 234ff.
  • J.A. Stephenson (1838)
  • Rudolf Ewald Stier (1869).
  • Augustus H. Strong, Systematic Theology (Old Tappan: 1907, p. 1010).
  • Moses Stuart, Commentary on the Apocalypse, 2 vols. (Andover: 1845).
  • Swegler.
  • Milton S. Terry, Biblical Hermeneutics, p. 467.
  • Thiersch, Die Kirche im apostolischm Zeitalter.
  • Friedrich August Gottreu Tholuck, Commentary on the Gospel of John (1827).
  • Tillich, Introduction to the New Testament.
  • Gustav Volkmar, Conmentur zur 0fienbarung (Zurich: 1862).
  • Foy E. Wallace, Jr., The Book of Revelation (Nashville: by the author, 1966) .
  • Israel P Warren (1878)
  • Bernhard Weiss, Die Johannes-Apokalypse. Textkritische Untersuchungen und Textherstellung (Leipsig, 1891).
  • Brooke Foss Westcott, The Gospel According to St. John (Grand Rapids: 1882).
  • J. J. Wetstein, New Testament Graecum, vol. 2 (Amsterdam: 1752).
  • Karl Wieseler, Zur Auslegung und Kritik der Apok. Literatur (Gottingen: 1839).
  • Charles Wordsworth, The New Testament, vol. 2 (London: 1864).
  • Robert Young, Commentary on the Book of Revelation (1885)
  • C. F. J. Zullig, Die Ofienbamng Johannis erklarten (Stuttgart: 1852).


I just listed around 150 published scholars from the past few hundred years, MOST of whom are NOT preterists, who adhere to the pre 70 AD date for the Revelation.

Now it's your turn.
Show us YOUR list of the Late Daters.... you should be able to present THOUSANDS of them if what you claimed above is true....
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Biblewriter

Senior Member
Site Supporter
May 15, 2005
11,935
1,498
Ocala, Florida
Visit site
✟531,725.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
CA-Conservatives
Continuing.........


  • A. Immer, Hermeneutics of the New Testament, trans. A. H. Newman (Andover: Draper, 1890).
  • Theodor Keim, Rom und das Christenthum.
  • Theodor Koppe, History of Jesus of Nazareth, 2nd cd., trans. Arthur Ransom (London: William and Norgate, 1883).
  • Max Krenkel, Der Apostel Johannes (Leipzig: 1871).
  • Johann Heinrich Kurtz, Church History, 9th cd., trans. John McPherson (3 vols. in 1) (New York: Funk and Wagnalls, 1888), pp. 41ff.
  • Victor Lechler, The Apostolic and Post-Apostolic Times: Their Diversity and Union Life and Doctrine, 3rd cd., vol. 2, trans. A. J. K. Davidson, (Edinburgh: 1886), pp. 166ff.
  • John Lightfoot (1658)
  • Joseph B. Lightfoot, Biblical Essays (London: 1893).
  • Gottfried Christian Friedrich Lücke, Versuch einer vollstandigen Einleitung in die Offenbarung Johannis, (Bonn: 1852).
  • Christoph Ernst Luthardt, Die Offenbarung Johannis (Leipzig: 1861).
  • James M. Macdonald, The Life and Writings of St. John (London: 1877).
  • Frederick Denisen Maurice, Lectures on the Apocalypse, 2nd ed. (London: 1885).
  • John David Michaelis, Introduction to the New Testament, vol. 4; and Sacred Books the New Testament.
  • Charles Pettit M’Ilvaine, The Evidences of Christianity (Philadelphia: 1861).
  • Theodor Mommsen, Roman History, vol. 5.
  • John Augustus Wilhelm Neander, The History of the Planting and Training of the Christian Church by the Apostles, trans. J. E. Ryland (Philadelphia: James M. Campbell, 1844), pp. 223ff.
  • Sir Isaac Newton, Observation Upon the Prophecies of Daniel, and the Apocalypse of St. John (London: 1732).
  • Bishop Thomas Newton, Dissertation on the Prophecies (London: 1832).
  • A. Niermeyer, Over de echteid der Johanneisch Schriften (Haag: 1852).
  • Professor Nehemiah A. Nisbett
  • Alfred Plummer (1891).
  • Dean Plumptere (1877)
  • Edward Hayes Plumtree, A Popular Exposition of the Epistles to the Seven Churches of Asia, 2nd ed. (London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1879).
  • Ernest Renan, L’Antechrist (Paris: 1871).
  • Eduard Wilhelm Eugen Reuss, History of the Sacred Scriptures of the New Testament (Edinburgh: T. &T. Clark, 1884).
  • Jean Reville, Reu. d. d. Mondes (Oct., 1863 and Dec., 1873).
  • Edward Robinson, Bibliotheca Sacra, vol. 3 (1843), pp. 532ff.
  • J. Stuart Russell, The Parousia (1878).
  • Salmon, G. Introduction to the New Testament.
  • Philip Schaff, History of the Christian Church, 3rd cd., vol. 1: Apostolic Christianity (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, [1910] 1950), p. 834.
  • Johann Friedrich Schleusner.
  • J. H. Scholten, de Apostel Johannis in Klein Azie (Leiden: 1871).
  • Albert Schwegler, Da Nachapostol Zeitalter (1846).
  • Henry C. Sheldon, The Early Church, vol. 1 of History of the Christian Church (New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1894), pp. 112ff.
  • William Henry Simcox, The Revelation of St. John Divine. The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges (Cambridge: Cambridge University, 1893).
  • Arthur Penrhyn Stanley, Sermons and Essays on the Apostolic Age (3rd ed: Oxford and London: 1874), pp. 234ff.
  • J.A. Stephenson (1838)
  • Rudolf Ewald Stier (1869).
  • Augustus H. Strong, Systematic Theology (Old Tappan: 1907, p. 1010).
  • Moses Stuart, Commentary on the Apocalypse, 2 vols. (Andover: 1845).
  • Swegler.
  • Milton S. Terry, Biblical Hermeneutics, p. 467.
  • Thiersch, Die Kirche im apostolischm Zeitalter.
  • Friedrich August Gottreu Tholuck, Commentary on the Gospel of John (1827).
  • Tillich, Introduction to the New Testament.
  • Gustav Volkmar, Conmentur zur 0fienbarung (Zurich: 1862).
  • Foy E. Wallace, Jr., The Book of Revelation (Nashville: by the author, 1966) .
  • Israel P Warren (1878)
  • Bernhard Weiss, Die Johannes-Apokalypse. Textkritische Untersuchungen und Textherstellung (Leipsig, 1891).
  • Brooke Foss Westcott, The Gospel According to St. John (Grand Rapids: 1882).
  • J. J. Wetstein, New Testament Graecum, vol. 2 (Amsterdam: 1752).
  • Karl Wieseler, Zur Auslegung und Kritik der Apok. Literatur (Gottingen: 1839).
  • Charles Wordsworth, The New Testament, vol. 2 (London: 1864).
  • Robert Young, Commentary on the Book of Revelation (1885)
  • C. F. J. Zullig, Die Ofienbamng Johannis erklarten (Stuttgart: 1852).


I just listed around 150 published scholars from the past few hundred years, MOST of whom are NOT preterists, who adhere to the pre 70 AD date for the Revelation.

Now it's your turn.
Show us YOUR list of the Late Daters.... you should be able to present THOUSANDS of them if what you claimed above is true....

I wouldn't even bother, until you showed that you got this list from something other than a preterist website. I have had experience with such lists before, and when I began to check in detail, found that the majority of those on the list did not even teach the alleged doctrine.

But to prove such a thing in this case would require me to waste much time over nothing.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0