That 47% of Americans are on government assistance isn't the truth. That people are irresponsible simply because they don't get paid a lot for their labor isn't the truth either. You can't make stuff up just to illustrate your point. Even if you agree with the basic idea of people being leachs and living off the government and such I don't see how anyone could agree with the specific examples he gave which not even factual.
Actually, according to Romney, 1 out of 2 people are a leach on society and don't matter.
See, this is where an appreciation of American History comes in handy. It was quite a long hard slog for most people during the Great Depression.
To expect Obama to clear up, in only 3-4 years a mess nearly 30 years in the making is to assume the President has some awesome powers.
We want change, we can't completely rely on the government to do it for us! That's kind of how a free market works.
The Republicans, however, don't have to "manufacture" anything... Mitt is manufacturing Mitt 2012 for them from whole cloth!
Have you guys ever in all the years you've been trying to pedal this garbage found an actual example of an American President who said "Gee, I want to see more Americans doing worse so I can do better!"Obama has not used those exact words, but that is hardly relevant. His policies and the result of those policies speak for themselves.
Unlike some politicians who clearly stated that their goal was to ensure Obama was a one term president, despite the fact that their goal should have been to ensure Americans were doing better.By insuring Obama is a one term president they are ensuring Americans are doing better.
I'm a liberal and I'm PRO-CHOICE, but that doesn't mean I love abortion!!!You may actually believe this, but make no mistake. When a leftist speaks of pro-choice, they are talking about abortion.
What it means is that if I were in a position to have to choose I would not want someone else dictating to me what I would be required to do with my own body under penalty of law.But....its ok if the state tells you what size drinks you can buy to put into your own body under penalty of law. Or what to smoke. But these are personal choices which only affect you. Where abortion is concerned, another life is at stake.
If I were a woman who found herself in a tricky situation you can be guaranteed I would be in abject misery over that choice and no doubt 99.99999% of women who do ARE quite unhappy with the choice.But they can be happy with the convenience.
BUT THE CHOICE NEEDS TO BE AVAILABLE.I am pro-choice. I just believe the choice needs to be made before pregnancy and not after.
Because not everyone is as "good" as you or follows your morality or has your infinite supply of time and money to support a pregnancy and/or unwanted child.And remember at all times that PRO-CHOICE =/= PRO-ABORTION.That is the mantra, but you can't seperate one from the other.
EDIT: Not sure why the quote function broke down. I tried to repair it but couldn't. I trust everyone's ability to still follow the narrative.
Romney has not hurt himself - in fact it has given energy to people to think this needs to be addressed. The average person has common sense to know he is not talking about people that need assistance or has earned it, but if people would just be honest they would admit there are many people on welfare and food stamps that could work if they wanted to - but when unemployment pays as much as a job - why not take a long vacation. Half the citizens not paying taxes and the other half not bringing in enough taxes to sustain us - we will go over the edge - printing money to the tune of 40 billion per month has devalued the dollar until we are on a path to crashing.
The argument is that Romney lied. He just makes things up to illustrate the point he was trying to make. Just because a person doesn't make enough money to be liable for income taxation doesn't imply that they are irresponsible. Do you think everyone who isn't liable for income taxation is irresponsible?so let's say the number 30% instead of 47%...that's the argument?
The argument is that Romney lied. He just makes things up to illustrate the point he was trying to make. Just because a person doesn't make enough money to be liable for income taxation doesn't imply that they are irresponsible. Do you think everyone who isn't liable for income taxation is irresponsible?
I see the term "corporate welfare" used fairly often but do not uderstand what you are specifically indicating. Can you take a post and clarify what is/is not included in your use fo this term? thanks.Part of my particular beef with Romney's statements is his inconsistent principle - he says nothing about the vast amount of government welfare to corporations - per the CATO institute, 50% more than the outlay to individuals. And whilst decrying what he calls a victim mentality among some, ignores the victim mentality of those who want - for example - lower capital gains taxes, or lobby for greater advantage for their business or sector, etc. Meanwhile, he states he takes every loophole he is entitled to - and in my book, entitlement is entitlement whether welfare, or tax break, or govt. welfare to big oil, ag, finance, and other sectors.
I see the term "corporate welfare" used fairly often but do not uderstand what you are specifically indicating. Can you take a post and clarify what is/is not included in your use fo this term? thanks.
Thanks for posting this for me. I appreciate your time.Sure - I posted it in one thread, but not sure which one
Here's a definition:
Definition: corporate welfare
n. Financial aid, such as a subsidy, provided by a government to corporations or other businesses.
There are many differences between the causes of the Great Depression and the economic situation today
You may actually believe this, but make no mistake. When a leftist speaks of pro-choice, they are talking about abortion.
But....its ok if the state tells you what size drinks you can buy to put into your own body under penalty of law.
Or what to smoke.
But these are personal choices which only affect you. Where abortion is concerned, another life is at stake.
My youngest son was unexpected. You are correct, I should have killed him. Who cares about responsibility.
That is the mantra, but you can't seperate one from the other.
EDIT: Not sure why the quote function broke down. I tried to repair it but couldn't. I trust everyone's ability to still follow the narrative.
My youngest son was unexpected. You are correct, I should have killed him.
This post was EXTREMELY OFFENSIVE! SIstrin accuses met of suggesting she should have killed her son! This is very, very, very scary. It is in no way what I said. Please take appropriate disciplinary action. Thanks.
My youngest son was unexpected.
(emphasis added)I am pro-choice. I just believe the choice needs to be made before pregnancy and not after.
no more than Obama and every other politician in Washington...
just to add I aint voting for either of them...I am a Christian and I only vote Christian.
I think Romney finally spoke the truth...
Way to exercise your rights. By not.
Hey, I'm not an 'Evangelical' ...Well considering that in order to be President of the US you pretty much have to proclaim your belief in God, preferably the Judeo-Christian God, Yahweh, and in most cases his only begotten son, the lord and savior Jesus Christ, jcp hasn't really eliminated any given candidate.
Unless one wishes to get into the semantics that some evangelicals like to about the "christianity" of Mormonism. But in general it really isn't limiting. In fact jcp could vote for everyone running form president under this rubric.
Hey, I'm not an 'Evangelical' ...
(Felt I should reply as I was the poster that challenged the Mormon understanding of Christ vs. the understanding of traditional Christianity - in my case Eastern Orthodox.)