Romney just cost himself the election

jpcedotal

Old School from the Backwoods - Christian Style
May 26, 2009
4,243
239
In between Deliverance and Brother, Where Art Thou
✟13,293.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Upvote 0

jpcedotal

Old School from the Backwoods - Christian Style
May 26, 2009
4,243
239
In between Deliverance and Brother, Where Art Thou
✟13,293.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
That 47% of Americans are on government assistance isn't the truth. That people are irresponsible simply because they don't get paid a lot for their labor isn't the truth either. You can't make stuff up just to illustrate your point. Even if you agree with the basic idea of people being leachs and living off the government and such I don't see how anyone could agree with the specific examples he gave which not even factual.

so let's say the number 30% instead of 47%...that's the argument?
 
Upvote 0

mathetes123

Newbie
Dec 26, 2011
2,469
53
✟10,634.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Actually, according to Romney, 1 out of 2 people are a leach on society and don't matter.

No. You are putting words in his mouth. He is talking about campaign strategy. Why would he devote limited resources and campaign funds to appeal to the 47% who are dependent on government and are more likely to vote for the redistributionist? It only makes sense.
 
Upvote 0

Sistrin

We are such stuff as dreams are made on...
Site Supporter
Jun 9, 2012
6,488
3,399
Location Location Location
✟197,980.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
See, this is where an appreciation of American History comes in handy. It was quite a long hard slog for most people during the Great Depression.

There are many differences between the causes of the Great Depression and the economic situation today, and how each was reacted to. In the 1930's the Fed allowed the banking system and the money supply to collapse. However you are correct in one similarity. There are those who argue the New Deal actually hampered the recovery, just as Obama's policies have hampered the current recovery. At the very least, in Obama's case they are correct.

To expect Obama to clear up, in only 3-4 years a mess nearly 30 years in the making is to assume the President has some awesome powers.

No, it is to assume he understands what he himself says, and that he ever actually means what he says.

FLASHBACK: Obama: My Presidency Will Be 'A One-Term Proposition' If Economy Doesn't Turn In 3 Years - YouTube

He is the one who said he could do it in his first term.

We want change, we can't completely rely on the government to do it for us! That's kind of how a free market works.

So you agree with what Mitt Romney said. Nice to know.

The Republicans, however, don't have to "manufacture" anything... Mitt is manufacturing Mitt 2012 for them from whole cloth!

Thanks for the DNC talking point.

Have you guys ever in all the years you've been trying to pedal this garbage found an actual example of an American President who said "Gee, I want to see more Americans doing worse so I can do better!"
Obama has not used those exact words, but that is hardly relevant. His policies and the result of those policies speak for themselves.

Unlike some politicians who clearly stated that their goal was to ensure Obama was a one term president, despite the fact that their goal should have been to ensure Americans were doing better.
By insuring Obama is a one term president they are ensuring Americans are doing better.

I'm a liberal and I'm PRO-CHOICE, but that doesn't mean I love abortion!!!
You may actually believe this, but make no mistake. When a leftist speaks of pro-choice, they are talking about abortion.

What it means is that if I were in a position to have to choose I would not want someone else dictating to me what I would be required to do with my own body under penalty of law.
But....its ok if the state tells you what size drinks you can buy to put into your own body under penalty of law. Or what to smoke. But these are personal choices which only affect you. Where abortion is concerned, another life is at stake.

If I were a woman who found herself in a tricky situation you can be guaranteed I would be in abject misery over that choice and no doubt 99.99999% of women who do ARE quite unhappy with the choice.
But they can be happy with the convenience.

BUT THE CHOICE NEEDS TO BE AVAILABLE.
I am pro-choice. I just believe the choice needs to be made before pregnancy and not after.

Because not everyone is as "good" as you or follows your morality or has your infinite supply of time and money to support a pregnancy and/or unwanted child.
And remember at all times that PRO-CHOICE =/= PRO-ABORTION.
That is the mantra, but you can't seperate one from the other.

EDIT: Not sure why the quote function broke down. I tried to repair it but couldn't. I trust everyone's ability to still follow the narrative.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest
Romney has not hurt himself - in fact it has given energy to people to think this needs to be addressed. The average person has common sense to know he is not talking about people that need assistance or has earned it, but if people would just be honest they would admit there are many people on welfare and food stamps that could work if they wanted to - but when unemployment pays as much as a job - why not take a long vacation. Half the citizens not paying taxes and the other half not bringing in enough taxes to sustain us - we will go over the edge - printing money to the tune of 40 billion per month has devalued the dollar until we are on a path to crashing.

Part of my particular beef with Romney's statements is his inconsistent principle - he says nothing about the vast amount of government welfare to corporations - per the CATO institute, 50% more than the outlay to individuals. And whilst decrying what he calls a victim mentality among some, ignores the victim mentality of those who want - for example - lower capital gains taxes, or lobby for greater advantage for their business or sector, etc. Meanwhile, he states he takes every loophole he is entitled to - and in my book, entitlement is entitlement whether welfare, or tax break, or govt. welfare to big oil, ag, finance, and other sectors.
 
Upvote 0

Illuminaughty

Drift and Doubt
May 18, 2012
4,617
133
✟20,609.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Green
so let's say the number 30% instead of 47%...that's the argument?
The argument is that Romney lied. He just makes things up to illustrate the point he was trying to make. Just because a person doesn't make enough money to be liable for income taxation doesn't imply that they are irresponsible. Do you think everyone who isn't liable for income taxation is irresponsible?
 
Upvote 0

jpcedotal

Old School from the Backwoods - Christian Style
May 26, 2009
4,243
239
In between Deliverance and Brother, Where Art Thou
✟13,293.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
The argument is that Romney lied. He just makes things up to illustrate the point he was trying to make. Just because a person doesn't make enough money to be liable for income taxation doesn't imply that they are irresponsible. Do you think everyone who isn't liable for income taxation is irresponsible?

No, but I also don't want to just do nothing to those who are...
 
Upvote 0

RedPaddy

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2012
2,526
79
✟3,110.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Part of my particular beef with Romney's statements is his inconsistent principle - he says nothing about the vast amount of government welfare to corporations - per the CATO institute, 50% more than the outlay to individuals. And whilst decrying what he calls a victim mentality among some, ignores the victim mentality of those who want - for example - lower capital gains taxes, or lobby for greater advantage for their business or sector, etc. Meanwhile, he states he takes every loophole he is entitled to - and in my book, entitlement is entitlement whether welfare, or tax break, or govt. welfare to big oil, ag, finance, and other sectors.
I see the term "corporate welfare" used fairly often but do not uderstand what you are specifically indicating. Can you take a post and clarify what is/is not included in your use fo this term? thanks.
 
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest
I see the term "corporate welfare" used fairly often but do not uderstand what you are specifically indicating. Can you take a post and clarify what is/is not included in your use fo this term? thanks.

Sure - I posted it in one thread, but not sure which one ^_^

Here's a definition:
Definition: corporate welfare
n. Financial aid, such as a subsidy, provided by a government to corporations or other businesses.

The Cato Institute estimated that, in 2002, $93 billion were devoted to corporate welfare. This is about 5 percent of the federal budget.To clarify what is and isn’t corporate welfare, a “no-bid” Iraq contract for the prestigious Halliburton, would not be considered corporate welfare because the government technically directly receives some good or service in exchange for this expenditure. Based on the Pentagon’s Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) findings of $1.4 billion of overcharging and fraud, I suppose the primary service they provide could be considered to be repeatedly violating the American taxpayer.On the other hand, the $15 billion in subsidies contained in the Energy Policy Act of 2005, to the oil, gas, and coal industries, would be considered corporate welfare because no goods or services are directly returned to the government in exchange for these expenditures.
Think by Numbers » Government Spends More on Corporate Welfare Subsidies than Social Welfare Programs

The CATO Institute has been covering this for years - more detailed discussions can be found by google searching "CATO Institute corporate welfare".
 
Upvote 0

RedPaddy

Well-Known Member
Jun 1, 2012
2,526
79
✟3,110.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Sure - I posted it in one thread, but not sure which one ^_^

Here's a definition:
Definition: corporate welfare
n. Financial aid, such as a subsidy, provided by a government to corporations or other businesses.
Thanks for posting this for me. I appreciate your time.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
T

TeddyReceptus

Guest
There are many differences between the causes of the Great Depression and the economic situation today

Reasonably incorrect. Rampant speculation, little control over financial instruments etc. Many of the things addressed by the various legislations including Glass-Steagal which had to be repealed in order to help precipitate the current crisis.

But by all means, the president is different. So there is that difference.

You may actually believe this, but make no mistake. When a leftist speaks of pro-choice, they are talking about abortion.

So you are telling me what I think? Very nice! Yes it does relate to abortion, but it doesn't mean we "love abortion".

But....its ok if the state tells you what size drinks you can buy to put into your own body under penalty of law.

Actually you'll note I didn't say that. I find the soda law quite stupid.

Or what to smoke.

This could easily become a slippery slope argument. I tend to avoid those because they always require adjudicated on at least agreed upon, or at best, reasonable grounds.

But these are personal choices which only affect you. Where abortion is concerned, another life is at stake.

So you don't think second hand smoke or even smoking/drinking by the expectant mother might also put another life at stake?

My youngest son was unexpected. You are correct, I should have killed him. Who cares about responsibility.

I'm afraid I'm going to have to report this. It is a grotesque mischaracterization of my point. You are kinda sick for saying that.

But I understand. You have to win the point. Congrats.

I never said a damn thing even remotely like that you sick person.

That is the mantra, but you can't seperate one from the other.

Ummm, yeah, you can. But if you really don't have simple logic skills I can see how it woudl be difficult for you.

EDIT: Not sure why the quote function broke down. I tried to repair it but couldn't. I trust everyone's ability to still follow the narrative.

Oh geez, it's just a matter of adding a "/" before the second quote to close out the command.

Simple stuff seems to evade you. And you can apologize anytime for suggesting I said you should have killed your child. You are truly, truly sick.

I fear for people like you. Your diseased imagination and evil thoughts are really scary!
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: JCSr
Upvote 0
T

TeddyReceptus

Guest
My youngest son was unexpected. You are correct, I should have killed him.

Sistrin, I've gone ahead and reported this with the following statement to the mods. I suggest you dial it back a bit. Maybe re-think your attitude. It is kind of scary and sick.

This post was EXTREMELY OFFENSIVE! SIstrin accuses met of suggesting she should have killed her son! This is very, very, very scary. It is in no way what I said. Please take appropriate disciplinary action. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
T

TeddyReceptus

Guest
My youngest son was unexpected.

Follow up question: Sistrin, how could your child be "unexpected"? Were you unaware of how babies were made at the time of conception or were you irresponsible?

I mean there's no way it could have been a mistake because that would violate your ideal:

I am pro-choice. I just believe the choice needs to be made before pregnancy and not after.
(emphasis added)

Seems you didn't make a choice if it was "unexpected". But I understand. You are a pious "good" person so all your actions are ipso facto "correct". You can sit on the throne at the right hand of God to judge the quick and the dead I suppose.

The point being, lest you miss it (most likely): not everyone makes the same decisions you did. Not everyone believes the same way you do. Not everyone has your righteousness and virtue. And some people might have a tougher time of it than you.

You seemed to be allowed to "not make a choice" but everyone else has to and if they don't, you will tell them what they can or can't do with their own bodies.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
T

TeddyReceptus

Guest
Way to exercise your rights. By not.

Well considering that in order to be President of the US you pretty much have to proclaim your belief in God, preferably the Judeo-Christian God, Yahweh, and in most cases his only begotten son, the lord and savior Jesus Christ, jcp hasn't really eliminated any given candidate.

Unless one wishes to get into the semantics that some evangelicals like to about the "christianity" of Mormonism. But in general it really isn't limiting. In fact jcp could vote for everyone running form president under this rubric.
 
Upvote 0
T

Thekla

Guest
Well considering that in order to be President of the US you pretty much have to proclaim your belief in God, preferably the Judeo-Christian God, Yahweh, and in most cases his only begotten son, the lord and savior Jesus Christ, jcp hasn't really eliminated any given candidate.

Unless one wishes to get into the semantics that some evangelicals like to about the "christianity" of Mormonism. But in general it really isn't limiting. In fact jcp could vote for everyone running form president under this rubric.
^_^ Hey, I'm not an 'Evangelical' ...

(Felt I should reply as I was the poster that challenged the Mormon understanding of Christ vs. the understanding of traditional Christianity - in my case Eastern Orthodox.)
 
Upvote 0
T

TeddyReceptus

Guest
^_^ Hey, I'm not an 'Evangelical' ...

(Felt I should reply as I was the poster that challenged the Mormon understanding of Christ vs. the understanding of traditional Christianity - in my case Eastern Orthodox.)

Oh you wouldn't be the first to raise any possible distinctions! I didn't mean to aim that at you.

My wife is a "recovering Catholic" and whe she hears people talk about religion and quoting the bible she likes to remind them that HER CHURCH gave them that bible so Catholics can say what they want.

As for Eastern Orthodox, well you guys left the One True Faith a loooong time ago! :)
 
Upvote 0

eldermike

Pray
Site Supporter
Mar 24, 2002
12,088
624
74
NC
Visit site
✟20,209.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
The context of his words are lost in this thread. He was not talking about the people, he was talking about the system. He's talking about having a different message in a climate such as he describes. He was telling his supporters that this will not be easy no matter what the President has done or might do later. He's right about the that. When He said his words were not carefully chosen but his message and the conversation about the state of politics is to go forward is a hint to the truth of what I am saying here.

He has a hard sell and that's what this is about. But in a world driven by emotion it's easy to see why so many imagine He's just hates poor people.

Either I am right or He hates the poor......
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums